Suppr超能文献

右美托咪定与吗啡作为布比卡因椎旁阻滞辅助用药在改良根治性乳房切除术后镇痛中的疗效比较

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine vs Morphine as an Adjunct in a Paravertebral Block with Bupivacaine in Postoperative Analgesia Following Modified Radical Mastectomy.

作者信息

Ahmed Malik Jamil, Ur Rehman Abaid, Arshad Rana Muhammad, Amjad Muhammad Wasim Ali, Khan Zeeshan, Furqan Aamir

机构信息

Anaesthesia, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Multan, PAK.

Anaesthesia, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 May 22;12(5):e8231. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8231.

Abstract

Objective To observe the efficacy of dexmedetomidine vs morphine as an adjunct in a paravertebral block (PVB) with bupivacaine in postoperative analgesia following modified radical mastectomy. Study design This was a randomized controlled trial performed from June 2018 to August 2019 in the Department of Anesthesia, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Ch. Pervaiz Ellahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan, Gurki Hospital, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, and Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore. Methodology Seventy-eight patients were equally divided into group M, which received morphine (3 mg) and group D, which received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg), along with 20 cc 0.25% bupivacaine, for PVB. The primary outcome included morphine requirements in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included the quality and duration of analgesia, intraoperative doses of fentanyl and propofol, postoperative doses of diclofenac required, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and the Ramsey sedation score. Data were entered into SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and analyzed by applying the independent t-test, Mann Whitney U-test, and the chi-square test or Fischer's exact test, as appropriate. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The mean time for the first analgesic administration was much shorter in group D as compared to group M (p<0.001). The average doses of ephedrine and morphine used were higher in group D (p-value 0.033 and 0.013, respectively). In the PACU, 33.3% of group D patients as compared to 12.8% of group M patients needed morphine (p=0.032). Postoperatively, diclofenac consumption was higher in group D (p<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower and sedation was higher in group M (p<0.05). Conclusion As an adjunct to bupivacaine in PVB for MRM, morphine is superior to dexmedetomidine.

摘要

目的 观察右美托咪定与吗啡作为布比卡因椎旁阻滞(PVB)辅助用药在改良根治性乳房切除术后镇痛中的效果。研究设计 这是一项随机对照试验,于2018年6月至2019年8月在巴赫塔瓦尔·阿明医学与牙科学院麻醉科、钱·佩尔韦兹·埃拉希心脏病学研究所、木尔坦古尔基医院、医学科学服务研究所和拉合尔谢赫·扎耶德医院进行。方法 78例患者被平均分为M组,接受吗啡(3mg),D组接受右美托咪定(1μg/kg),同时联合20cc 0.25%布比卡因进行PVB。主要结局包括麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的吗啡需求量。次要结局包括镇痛质量和持续时间、术中芬太尼和丙泊酚剂量、术后所需双氯芬酸剂量、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)以及拉姆齐镇静评分。数据录入SPSS 23版(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克),并根据情况应用独立t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验以及卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验进行分析。P≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果 与M组相比,D组首次给予镇痛药物的平均时间要短得多(p<0.001)。D组使用的麻黄碱和吗啡平均剂量更高(p值分别为0.033和0.013)。在PACU中,D组33.3%的患者需要吗啡,而M组为12.8%(p=0.032)。术后,D组双氯芬酸消耗量更高(p<0.001)。M组术后疼痛更低,镇静程度更高(p<0.05)。结论 在改良根治性乳房切除术中PVB使用布比卡因时,作为辅助用药,吗啡优于右美托咪定。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验