Suppr超能文献

曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物联合卡培他滨对比曲妥珠单抗-美坦新偶联物单药治疗既往治疗过的 ERBB2(HER2)阳性转移性乳腺癌患者的疗效和安全性:一项Ⅰ期和随机Ⅱ期试验。

Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Emtansine Plus Capecitabine vs Trastuzumab Emtansine Alone in Patients With Previously Treated ERBB2 (HER2)-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 and Randomized Phase 2 Trial.

机构信息

Quirónsalud Group, IOB Institute of Oncology, Madrid, Spain.

Quirónsalud Group, IOB Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2020 Aug 1;6(8):1203-1209. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1796.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

ERBB2 (HER2)-targeted therapy provides benefits in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and gastric cancer, but additional treatments are needed to maximize efficacy and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

To determine maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC and locally advanced/metastatic gastric cancer (LA/mGC) (phase 1) and the efficacy and safety of this combination vs T-DM1 alone in patients with mBC (phase 2).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The MTD in phase 1 was assessed using a 3 + 3 design with capecitabine dose modification. Phase 2 was an open-label, randomized, international multicenter study of patients with mBC treated with T-DM1 plus capecitabine or T-DM1 alone. Eligible patients had previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC or LA/mGC with no prior chemotherapy treatment for advanced disease.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients in the phase 1 mBC cohort received capecitabine (750 mg/m2, 700 mg/m2, or 650 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-14 of a 3-week cycle) plus T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients with LA/mGC received capecitabine at the mBC phase 1 MTD, de-escalating as needed, plus T-DM1 2.4 mg/kg weekly. In phase 2, patients with mBC were randomized (1:1) to receive capecitabine (at the phase 1 MTD) plus T-DM1 or T-DM1 alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The phase 1 primary objective was to identify the MTD of capecitabine plus T-DM1. The phase 2 primary outcome was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

In phase 1, the median (range) age was 54.0 (37-71) and 57.5 (53-70) years for patients with mBC and patients with LA/mGC, respectively. The capecitabine MTD was identified as 700 mg/m2 in 11 patients with mBC and 6 patients with LA/mGC evaluable for dose-limiting toxic effects. In phase 2, between October 2014 and April 2016, patients with mBC (median [range] age, 52.0 [28-80] years) were randomized to receive combination therapy (n = 81) or T-DM1 (n = 80). The ORR was 44% (36 of 81 patients) and 36% (29 of 80 patients) in the combination and T-DM1 groups, respectively (difference, 8.2%; 90% CI, -4.5 to 20.9; P = .34; clinical cutoff, May 31, 2017). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 78 of 82 patients (95%) in the combination group, with 36 (44%) experiencing grade 3-4 AEs, and 69 of 78 patients (88%) in the T-DM1 group, with 32 (41%) experiencing grade 3-4 AEs. No grade 5 AEs were reported.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Adding capecitabine to T-DM1 did not statistically increase ORR associated with T-DM1 in patients with previously treated ERBB2-positive mBC. The combination group reported more AEs, but with no unexpected toxic effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01702558.

摘要

重要性

ERBB2(HER2)-靶向治疗在转移性乳腺癌(mBC)和胃癌中提供了益处,但需要额外的治疗来最大限度地提高疗效和生活质量。

目的

确定先前接受过 ERBB2 阳性 mBC 和局部晚期/转移性胃癌(LA/mGC)治疗的患者中曲妥珠单抗emtansine(T-DM1)加卡培他滨的最大耐受剂量(MTD)( 1 期)和该联合方案在 mBC 患者中的疗效和安全性( 2 期)与 T-DM1 单药相比。

设计、设置和参与者:在 1 期采用 3+3 设计评估 MTD ,并调整卡培他滨剂量。 2 期是一项开放标签、随机、国际多中心研究,入组的 mBC 患者接受 T-DM1 加卡培他滨或 T-DM1 单药治疗。合格患者先前接受过 ERBB2 阳性 mBC 或 LA/mGC 治疗,无晚期疾病的先前化疗。

干预措施

1 期 mBC 队列的患者接受卡培他滨(750 mg/m 2 、700 mg/m 2 或 650 mg/m 2 ,每日 2 次,每 3 周周期的第 1-14 天)加 T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg,每 3 周 1 次。 LA/mGC 患者接受 mBC 阶段 1 MTD 的卡培他滨,必要时逐渐减少剂量,加 T-DM1 2.4 mg/kg 每周 1 次。在 2 期,mBC 患者随机(1:1)接受卡培他滨(MTD )加 T-DM1 或 T-DM1 单药治疗。

主要结局和测量

1 期的主要目标是确定卡培他滨加 T-DM1 的 MTD。 2 期的主要结局是研究者评估的总缓解率(ORR)。

结果

在 1 期, mBC 和 LA/mGC 可评价患者的中位(范围)年龄分别为 54.0(37-71)和 57.5(53-70)岁。确定卡培他滨的 MTD 为 11 例 mBC 和 6 例 LA/mGC 患者可评价剂量限制毒性效应的 700 mg/m 2 。在 2 期,2014 年 10 月至 2016 年 4 月,mBC 患者(中位[范围]年龄,52.0[28-80]岁)被随机分为接受联合治疗( n = 81 )或 T-DM1( n = 80 )。联合组的 ORR 为 44%(36/81 例患者),T-DM1 组为 36%(29/80 例患者)(差异为 8.2%;90%CI 为-4.5 至 20.9; P =.34;临床截止日期为 2017 年 5 月 31 日)。联合组 78 例患者(95%)和 T-DM1 组 69 例患者(88%)报告了不良事件(AE),其中 36 例(44%)患者发生 3-4 级 AE,32 例(41%)患者发生 3-4 级 AE。未报告 5 级 AE。

结论和相关性

在先前接受过 ERBB2 阳性 mBC 治疗的患者中,与 T-DM1 相比,加用卡培他滨并未使 T-DM1 相关的 ORR 统计学上增加。联合组报告的 AE 更多,但没有意外的毒性作用。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01702558。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b58f/7317656/97997319601c/jamaoncol-6-1203-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验