Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
BrainsCAN, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Jul 1;124(1):284-294. doi: 10.1152/jn.00232.2020. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
People commonly hold and manipulate a variety of objects in everyday life, and these objects have different physical properties. To successfully control this wide range of objects, people must associate new patterns of tactile stimuli with appropriate motor outputs. We performed a series of experiments investigating the extent to which people can voluntarily modify tactile-motor associations in the context of a rapid tactile-motor response guiding the hand to a moving target (previously described in Pruszynski JA, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. 26: 788-792, 2016) by using an anti-reach paradigm in which participants were instructed to move their hands in the opposite direction of a target jump. We compared performance to that observed when people make visually guided reaches to a moving target (cf. Day BL, Lyon IN. 130: 159-168, 2000; Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y. 3: 729-736, 2000). When participants had visual feedback, motor responses during the anti-reach task showed early automatic responses toward the moving target before later modification to move in the instructed direction. When the same participants had only tactile feedback, however, they were able to suppress this early phase of the motor response, which occurs <100 ms after the target jump. Our results indicate that while the tactile motor and visual motor systems both support rapid responses that appear similar under some conditions, the circuits underlying responses show sharp distinctions in terms of their malleability. When people reach toward a visual target that moves suddenly, they automatically correct their reach to follow the object; even when explicitly instructed not to follow a moving visual target, people exhibit an initial incorrect movement before moving in the correct direction. We show that when people use tactile feedback, they do not show an initial incorrect response, even though early muscle activity still occurs.
人们在日常生活中经常握持和操纵各种物体,这些物体具有不同的物理特性。为了成功控制这广泛的物体,人们必须将新的触觉刺激模式与适当的运动输出相关联。我们进行了一系列实验,研究了人们在快速触觉-运动反应的背景下自愿修改触觉-运动关联的程度,该反应指导手向移动目标移动(之前在 Pruszynski JA、Johansson RS、Flanagan JR 的研究中描述过,26: 788-792, 2016),使用反伸手范式,参与者被指示将手向目标跳跃的相反方向移动。我们将性能与在视觉引导下向移动目标伸手的情况进行了比较(参见 Day BL、Lyon IN 的研究,130: 159-168, 2000;Pisella L、Grea H、Tilikete C、Vighetto A、Desmurget M、Rode G、Boisson D、Rossetti Y 的研究,3: 729-736, 2000)。当参与者有视觉反馈时,反伸手任务中的运动反应在向移动目标自动做出早期反应之前,先向指示的方向移动。然而,当相同的参与者只有触觉反馈时,他们能够抑制运动反应的早期阶段,该阶段发生在目标跳跃后<100 毫秒。我们的结果表明,虽然触觉运动和视觉运动系统都支持在某些条件下看起来相似的快速反应,但支持反应的电路在可变性方面存在明显的区别。当人们向突然移动的视觉目标伸出手时,他们会自动修正伸手以跟随物体;即使被明确指示不要跟随移动的视觉目标,人们在向正确方向移动之前也会先做出错误的动作。我们表明,当人们使用触觉反馈时,他们不会表现出初始错误的反应,即使早期肌肉活动仍然发生。