• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

17%EDTA 和 QMiX 超声激活对玷污层去除和密封剂渗透的影响:离体研究。

The effect of 17% EDTA and QMiX ultrasonic activation on smear layer removal and sealer penetration: ex vivo study.

机构信息

Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlândia (UFU), Uberlândia, MG, Brazil.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa (UEPG), Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67303-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-67303-z
PMID:32587397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7316761/
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effect of conventional irrigation (CI) and passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with 17% EDTA and QMiX on the maximum depth and percentage of sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and to describe the cleaning of root canal walls by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Eighty single-rooted human mandibular premolars were instrumented and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 20): EDTA + CI, QMiX + CI, EDTA + PUI, and QMiX + PUI. Ten samples from each group were examined by SEM (2,000×) and the remaining 40 roots were filled with a single gutta-percha cone and AH Plus sealer mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B for analysis by CLSM (10×). Images were assessed at distances of 2 mm (apical), 5 mm (middle), and 8 mm (coronal) from the apex with the Leica Application Suite V4.10 software. The EDTA + PUI and QMiX + PUI protocols presented higher rates of debris/smear layer removal in the apical and middle thirds. The PUI was superior to CI in the maximum depth of sealer penetration at the middle third. The QMiX + PUI group had a higher percentage of sealer penetration at the apical third. The PUI and QMiX protocol improved debris/smear layer removal and tubular dentin sealer penetration.

摘要

本研究旨在通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜 (CLSM) 比较传统冲洗 (CI) 和被动超声冲洗 (PUI) 联合 17% EDTA 和 QMiX 与 PUI 联合 EDTA 和 QMiX 对牙本质小管内封闭剂渗透最大深度和百分比的影响,并通过扫描电子显微镜 (SEM) 描述根管壁的清洁情况。80 颗单根下颌前磨牙被仪器化并随机分为四组(n = 20):EDTA + CI、QMiX+CI、EDTA + PUI 和 QMiX+PUI。每组的 10 个样本用 SEM(2,000×)进行检查,其余 40 个根用单个牙胶尖和 AH Plus 密封剂填充,并与 0.1%罗丹明 B 混合,用于 CLSM(10×)分析。图像在距离根尖 2 mm(根尖)、5 mm(中间)和 8 mm(冠部)处用 Leica Application Suite V4.10 软件进行评估。EDTA + PUI 和 QMiX+PUI 方案在根尖和中间三分之一处具有更高的去除碎屑/玷污层的比例。在中间三分之一处,PUI 比 CI 具有更高的密封剂渗透最大深度。QMiX+PUI 组在根尖三分之一处具有更高的密封剂渗透比例。PUI 和 QMiX 方案提高了碎屑/玷污层的去除和管状牙本质密封剂的渗透。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/1c294d08a569/41598_2020_67303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/22b70cc51505/41598_2020_67303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/68122a14f805/41598_2020_67303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/1c294d08a569/41598_2020_67303_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/22b70cc51505/41598_2020_67303_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/68122a14f805/41598_2020_67303_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1547/7316761/1c294d08a569/41598_2020_67303_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of 17% EDTA and QMiX ultrasonic activation on smear layer removal and sealer penetration: ex vivo study.17%EDTA 和 QMiX 超声激活对玷污层去除和密封剂渗透的影响:离体研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 25;10(1):10311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67303-z.
2
The effect of final irrigation on the penetrability of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopy study.最终冲洗对环氧树脂类封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jan;20(1):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1474-8. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
3
Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro.比较 Easydo 激活器、超声和针头冲洗技术对体外封闭剂渗透和玷污层去除的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y.
4
Effect of QMix 2in1 on sealer penetration into the dentinal tubules.QMix 2in1对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响。
J Endod. 2015 Feb;41(2):257-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
5
Effect of chitosan nanoparticle, QMix, and EDTA on TotalFill BC sealers' dentinal tubule penetration: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.壳聚糖纳米粒子、QMix 和 EDTA 对 TotalFill BC 根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透性的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Odontology. 2019 Jan;107(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s10266-018-0359-0. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study.不同最终冲洗程序后AH Plus、iRoot SP、MTA fillapex和guttaflow生物封闭根管封闭剂对牙本质小管的渗透:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Influence of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the efficiency of various irrigation solutions in removing smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study.被动超声冲洗对不同冲洗液去除玷污层效率的影响:一项扫描电子显微镜研究
Microsc Res Tech. 2017 May;80(5):537-542. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22829. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
8
Effect of EndoActivator and Er,Cr:YSGG laser activation of Qmix, as final endodontic irrigant, on sealer penetration: A Confocal microscopic study.EndoActivator及铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光激活Qmix作为最终根管冲洗剂对封闭剂渗透的影响:一项共聚焦显微镜研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Feb 1;9(2):e218-e222. doi: 10.4317/jced.53270. eCollection 2017 Feb.
9
Assessment of different irrigation techniques on the penetration depth of different sealers into dentinal tubules by confocal laser scanning microscope: An comparative study.通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜评估不同冲洗技术对不同封闭剂渗入牙本质小管深度的影响:一项比较研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):388-392. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_335_23. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
10
The Effects of Different Agitation Techniques of Canal Irrigant on Tubular Penetration of a Bioceramic Sealer.根管冲洗液不同搅拌技术对生物陶瓷封闭剂根管渗透的影响
Iran Endod J. 2019 Fall;14(4):289-295. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i4.25548.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro evaluation of dye penetration and dentin microhardness after laser irradiation using photon-induced photoacoustic streaming and shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming tips compared to ultrasonic activation.与超声激活相比,使用光子诱导光声流和冲击波增强发射光声流尖端对激光照射后的染料渗透和牙本质显微硬度进行体外评估。
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Jan 31;40(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04310-4.
2
Unveiling SmearOFF Efficacy in Smear Layer Removal through Ultrasonic Activation Examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy.通过扫描电子显微镜检查超声激活在去除玷污层方面揭示SmearOFF的功效
Int J Biomater. 2024 Sep 21;2024:8188413. doi: 10.1155/2024/8188413. eCollection 2024.
3
The Effect of Different Compositions and Concentrations of Etidronate-Containing Irrigants on the Antibacterial Activity of Sodium Hypochlorite against and .
含依替膦酸的冲洗液的不同成分和浓度对次氯酸钠针对……和……的抗菌活性的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;12(3):46. doi: 10.3390/dj12030046.
4
Comparison of Easydo Activator, ultrasonic and needle irrigation techniques on sealer penetration and smear layer removal in vitro.比较 Easydo 激活器、超声和针头冲洗技术对体外封闭剂渗透和玷污层去除的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03833-y.
5
Comparative evaluation of effect of nisin-incorporated ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid and MTAD on endodontic biofilm eradication, smear layer removal, and depth of sealer penetration.尼生素结合乙二胺四乙酸与 MTAD 对根管生物膜清除、玷污层去除及封闭剂渗透深度效果的比较评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec;27(12):7247-7259. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05285-8. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
6
Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Chelating Agents in Endodontic Treatment among Dental Practitioners.牙科从业者对牙髓病治疗中螯合剂的知识、态度和实践
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;11(7):156. doi: 10.3390/dj11070156.
7
Effects of Antimicrobial Photosensitizers of Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) to Treat Periodontitis.光动力疗法(PDT)抗菌光敏剂治疗牙周炎的效果。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2024;25(10):1209-1229. doi: 10.2174/1389201024666230720104516.
8
Dentinal Tubule Penetrability and Bond Strength of Two Novel Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.两种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透性和粘结强度
Materials (Basel). 2023 Apr 23;16(9):3309. doi: 10.3390/ma16093309.
9
Comparative evaluation of canal cleanliness at apical third using Self-Adjusting File and Wave One File with different irrigants: an scanning electron microscopic study.使用自调锉和Wave One锉配合不同冲洗剂对根尖三分之一处根管清洁度的比较评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究。
Med Pharm Rep. 2023 Jan;96(1):79-85. doi: 10.15386/mpr-2238. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
10
Evaluation of the Antimicrobial Effect of N-acetylcysteine and Photodynamic Therapy on Root Canals Infected with .N-乙酰半胱氨酸和光动力疗法对感染根管的抗菌作用评估 。 需注意,原文末尾“infected with.”后面似乎缺少具体病菌名称等完整信息。
Iran Endod J. 2020 Fall;15(4):236-245. doi: 10.22037/iej.v15i4.26865.