Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, US.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, TZ.
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Jun 16;86(1):61. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2878.
Traditional health practitioners remain a critical source of care in Tanzania, more than 50% of Tanzanians frequently using their services. With a severe shortage of orthopaedic surgeons (1:3.3 million Tanzanians) traditional bone setters (TBSs) could potentially expand access to musculoskeletal care and improve outcomes for morbidity as a result of trauma.
We sought to identify the advantages and disadvantages of traditional bone setting in Tanzania and to assess potential for collaboration between TBSs and allopathic orthopaedic surgeons.
Between June and July 2017 we interviewed six TBSs identified as key informants in the regions of Kilimanjaro, Arusha, and Manyara. We conducted semi-structured interviews about practices and perspectives on allopathic healthcare, and analyzed the data using a deductive framework method.
The TBSs reported that their patients were primarily recruited from their local communities via word-of-mouth communication networks. Payment methods for services included bundling costs, livestock barter, and sliding scale pricing. Potentially unsafe practices included lack of radiographic imaging to confirm reduction; cutting and puncturing of skin with unsterile tools; and rebreaking healed fractures. The TBSs described past experience collaborating with allopathic healthcare providers, referring patients to hospitals, and utilizing allopathic techniques in their practice. All expressed enthusiasm in future collaboration with allopathic hospitals.
TBSs confer the advantages of word-of-mouth communication networks and greater financial and geographic accessibility. However, some of their practices raise concerns relating to infection, fracture malunion or nonunion, and iatrogenic trauma from manipulating previously healed fractures. A formal collaboration between TBSs and orthopaedic surgeons, based on respect and regular communication, could alleviate concerns through the development of care protocols and increase access to optimal orthopaedic care through a standardized triage and follow-up system.
传统的医疗从业者仍然是坦桑尼亚医疗保健的重要来源,超过 50%的坦桑尼亚人经常使用他们的服务。由于骨科医生严重短缺(每 330 万坦桑尼亚人中只有 1 名),传统的接骨师(TBS)有可能扩大对肌肉骨骼护理的获取,并改善因创伤导致的发病率。
我们旨在确定传统接骨术在坦桑尼亚的优势和劣势,并评估 TBS 与正统骨科医生之间的合作潜力。
我们于 2017 年 6 月至 7 月期间,在乞力马扎罗、阿鲁沙和马尼亚拉地区,对六名被确定为关键信息提供者的 TBS 进行了访谈。我们就正统医疗保健方面的做法和观点进行了半结构化访谈,并使用演绎框架方法对数据进行了分析。
TBS 报告称,他们的患者主要是通过口口相传的社区网络招募而来。服务费用的支付方式包括捆绑费用、牲畜易货和浮动定价。可能不安全的做法包括缺乏影像学检查以确认复位;使用未经消毒的工具切割和刺破皮肤;以及重新折断已愈合的骨折。TBS 描述了与正统医疗保健提供者合作的过往经验,包括将患者转介到医院,以及在实践中使用正统技术。所有人都对未来与正统医院的合作表示热情。
TBS 具有口碑传播网络和更大的财务及地理可及性优势。然而,他们的一些做法存在感染、骨折愈合不良或不愈合、以及因操作先前愈合的骨折而导致医源性创伤等相关问题。TBS 和骨科医生之间基于尊重和定期沟通的正式合作,可以通过制定护理协议来缓解这些问题,并通过标准化分诊和随访系统来增加获得最佳骨科护理的机会。