Suppr超能文献

“随波逐流”:一项探索患者及护理者对癌症护理决策认知的定性研究

"Along for the Ride": A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Decision Making in Cancer Care.

作者信息

Holdsworth Laura M, Zionts Dani, Asch Steven M, Winget Marcy

机构信息

Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

出版信息

MDM Policy Pract. 2020 Jun 11;5(1):2381468320933576. doi: 10.1177/2381468320933576. eCollection 2020 Jan-Jun.

Abstract

Shared decision making is a cornerstone of an informed consent process for cancer treatment, yet there are often many physician and patient-related barriers to participation in the process. Decisions in cancer care are often perceived as relating to a discrete, treatment decision event, yet there is evidence that decisions are longitudinal in nature and reflect a multifactorial experience. To explore patient and caregiver perceptions of the choices and decision-making opportunities within cancer care. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 37 cancer patients and 7 caregivers carried out as part of an evaluation of a cancer center's effort to improve patient experience. Participants described decision making related to four distinct phases in complex cancer care, with physicians leading, and often limiting, decisions related to disease assessment and treatment options and access, and patients leading decisions related to physician selection. Though physicians led many decisions, patients had a moderating influence on treatment, such that if patients did not like options presented, they would reconsider their options and sometimes switch physicians. Patients had various strategies for dealing with uncertainty when faced with decisions, such as seeking additional information to make an informed choice or making a conscious choice to defer decision making to the physician. Patients were sampled from one academic cancer center that serves a predominantly Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino population and received complex treatment. Because of the complexity of cancer treatment, many patients felt as though they were a "passenger" in decision making about care and did not lead many of the decisions, though many patients trusted their doctors to make the best decisions and were comforted by their expertise.

摘要

共同决策是癌症治疗知情同意过程的基石,但参与这一过程往往存在许多与医生和患者相关的障碍。癌症护理中的决策通常被视为与一个离散的治疗决策事件相关,但有证据表明,决策本质上是纵向的,反映了多因素的经历。为了探索患者和护理人员对癌症护理中选择和决策机会的看法。作为对癌症中心改善患者体验努力的评估的一部分,对37名癌症患者和7名护理人员进行了定性深入访谈。参与者描述了复杂癌症护理中与四个不同阶段相关的决策,医生主导并常常限制与疾病评估、治疗选择和获取相关的决策,而患者主导与医生选择相关的决策。尽管医生主导了许多决策,但患者对治疗有调节作用,即如果患者不喜欢所提供的选择,他们会重新考虑自己的选择,有时会更换医生。患者在面对决策时应对不确定性有各种策略,例如寻求更多信息以做出明智的选择,或有意识地选择将决策推迟给医生。患者来自一个主要服务于白种人、亚洲人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群并接受复杂治疗的学术癌症中心。由于癌症治疗的复杂性,许多患者觉得自己在护理决策中就像一个“乘客”,没有主导很多决策,尽管许多患者信任他们的医生做出最佳决策,并对他们的专业知识感到安心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc8a/7294494/864b9aabf1a2/10.1177_2381468320933576-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验