Gardner Robert S, Anderson Hannah S, Mainetti Matteo, Ascoli Giorgio A
Center for Neural Informatics, Structures, and Plasticity, Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, US.
Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, US.
J Cogn. 2020 Jun 17;3(1):14. doi: 10.5334/joc.105.
Autobiographical memory (AM), the recollection of personally-experienced events, has several adaptive functions and has been studied across numerous dimensions. We previously introduced two methods to quantify across the life span AM content (the amount and types of retrieved details) and the everyday occurrence of its recollection. The CRAM (cue-recalled autobiographical memory) test used naturalistic word prompts to elicit AMs. Subjects dated the memories to life periods and reported the numbers of details recalled across eight features (e.g., spatial detail, temporal detail, people, and emotions). In separate subjects, an experience sampling method quantified in everyday settings the frequency of AM retrieval and of mental representation of future personal events or actions (termed prospective memory: PM); these data permit evaluation of the temporal orientation of episodic recollection. We describe these datasets now publicly released in open access (CRAM: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10246958; AM-PM experience-sampling: doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10246940). We also present examples of data mining, using cluster analyses of CRAM (14,242 AMs scored for content from 4,244 subjects). Analysis of raw feature scores yielded three AM clusters separated by total recalled content. Normalizing for total content revealed three classes of AM based on the relative contributions of each feature: AMs containing a relatively large number of details related to people, AMs containing a high degree of spatial information, and AMs with details equally distributed across features. Differences in subject age, memory age, and total content were detected across feature clusters. These findings highlight the value in additional mining of these datasets to further our understanding of autobiographical recollection.
自传体记忆(AM),即对个人经历事件的回忆,具有多种适应性功能,并已在多个维度上得到研究。我们之前介绍了两种方法来量化整个生命周期中的AM内容(检索到的细节数量和类型)及其回忆在日常生活中的发生情况。CRAM(线索回忆自传体记忆)测试使用自然主义的单词提示来引发AM。受试者将记忆追溯到生命阶段,并报告在八个特征(例如空间细节、时间细节、人物和情感)中回忆的细节数量。在另一组受试者中,一种经验抽样方法在日常环境中量化了AM检索的频率以及对未来个人事件或行动的心理表征(称为前瞻记忆:PM);这些数据允许评估情景回忆的时间取向。我们描述了现在以开放获取方式公开发布的这些数据集(CRAM:doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10246958;AM-PM经验抽样:doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.10246940)。我们还展示了数据挖掘的示例,使用对CRAM(对来自4244名受试者的内容进行评分的14242个AM)的聚类分析。对原始特征分数的分析产生了三个由总回忆内容分隔的AM聚类。对总内容进行归一化后,基于每个特征的相对贡献揭示了三类AM:包含相对大量与人物相关细节的AM、包含高度空间信息的AM以及细节在各特征间均匀分布的AM。在特征聚类中检测到了受试者年龄、记忆年龄和总内容的差异。这些发现突出了对这些数据集进行额外挖掘以进一步加深我们对自传体回忆理解的价值。