Suppr超能文献

颅内动脉瘤破裂状态的判别:在血流动力学模拟中,个体化的流入边界条件或许并非必需。

Discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status: patient-specific inflow boundary may not be a must-have condition in hemodynamic simulations.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, NansanhuanXilu 119, Fengtai District, Beijing, 100070, China.

Institute of Biomechanics, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2020 Nov;62(11):1485-1495. doi: 10.1007/s00234-020-02473-1. Epub 2020 Jun 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) are important in evaluating the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysm rupture, and the setting of inflow boundary conditions is critical. We evaluated intracranial aneurysm hemodynamics based on generalized versus patient-specific inflow boundary conditions to examine the effect of different hemodynamic results on the discrimination of intracranial aneurysm rupture status.

METHODS

We enrolled 148 patients with 156 intracranial aneurysms. For each included aneurysm, we performed CFD simulation once based on patient-specific and once based on generalized inflow boundary conditions. First, we compared the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms based on different inflow boundary conditions. Then, we divided the included aneurysms into a ruptured and unruptured group and compared the hemodynamics between the two groups under patient-specific and generalized inflow boundary conditions.

RESULTS

For the hemodynamic parameters using specific inflow boundary conditions, more complex flow (p = 0.002), larger minimum WSS (p = 0.024), lower maximum low WSS area (LSA) (p = 0.038), and oscillatory shear index (p = 0.002) were found. Furthermore, we compared the hemodynamics between ruptured and unruptured groups based on different inflow boundary conditions. We found that the significant hemodynamic parameters associated with rupture status were the same, including the proportion of aneurysms with flow complex and unstable flow and the minimum and maximum of LSA (p = 0.011, p = 0.003, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patient-specific and generalized inflow boundary conditions of aneurysmal hemodynamics resulted in significant differences. However, the significant parameters associated with rupture status were the same in both conditions, indicating that patient-specific inflow boundary conditions may not be necessary for predicting rupture risk.

摘要

背景

计算流体动力学(CFD)在评估颅内动脉瘤破裂的血流动力学方面非常重要,而流入边界条件的设定至关重要。我们基于广义和患者特定的流入边界条件评估颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学,以研究不同血流动力学结果对颅内动脉瘤破裂状态的区分效果。

方法

我们纳入了 148 例患者的 156 个颅内动脉瘤。对于每个纳入的动脉瘤,我们分别基于患者特定和广义流入边界条件进行了一次 CFD 模拟。首先,我们比较了基于不同流入边界条件的颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学。然后,我们将纳入的动脉瘤分为破裂组和未破裂组,并比较了在患者特定和广义流入边界条件下两组的血流动力学。

结果

对于使用特定流入边界条件的血流动力学参数,我们发现了更复杂的流动(p=0.002)、更大的最小 WSS(p=0.024)、更低的最大低 WSS 面积(LSA)(p=0.038)和振荡剪切指数(p=0.002)。此外,我们基于不同的流入边界条件比较了破裂组和未破裂组的血流动力学。我们发现,与破裂状态相关的显著血流动力学参数是相同的,包括具有复杂流动和不稳定流动的动脉瘤比例以及最小和最大 LSA(p=0.011,p=0.003,p=0.001 和 p=0.004)。

结论

动脉瘤血流动力学的患者特定和广义流入边界条件导致了显著差异。然而,在两种条件下,与破裂状态相关的显著参数是相同的,这表明对于预测破裂风险,患者特定的流入边界条件可能不是必需的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验