• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者对博彩收入的关注:公共卫生干预的障碍?

Stakeholder interests in gambling revenue: an obstacle to public health interventions?

机构信息

University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Research on Addiction, Control and Governance (CEACG), 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.

University of Helsinki, Faculty of Social Sciences, Centre for Research on Addiction, Control and Governance (CEACG), 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.021
PMID:32591218
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article explores the financial interests that are behind gambling revenue and their relative importance. Identifying these interests is crucial to further analysis on how they may impact gambling policy and public health interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

The analysis focuses on the spending structures of ten European gambling operators derived from their income statements to identify where money from gambling is further directed and who are the main financial stakeholders (SHs).

METHODS

Gambling companies' income statements were categorised based on four types of SHs: states, earmarked contributions, operators, and cost-dependants. The sums directed to these groups are compared with company gross gambling revenue (GGR).

RESULTS

Overall, the main financial SHs behind gambling appear to be states and earmarked beneficiaries. State budgets and earmarked contributions account for an average of 50 percent of the GGR of gambling companies, whereas about one-third is directed to cost-dependants. The most significant cost-dependant groups that can be identified are the distribution network and providers of materials. Results also show variance between companies depending on institutional contexts.

CONCLUSIONS

The importance of states and earmarked causes as significant beneficiaries of European gambling companies is confirmed by the analysis. The results also show that cost-dependants are an important financial SH in gambling. The implications on public health of a wide network of SHs in gambling revenue are discussed.

摘要

目的

本文探讨了赌博收入背后的财务利益及其相对重要性。确定这些利益对于进一步分析它们如何影响赌博政策和公共卫生干预措施至关重要。

研究设计

该分析侧重于从十家欧洲博彩运营商的收益表中得出的支出结构,以确定赌博资金的去向以及主要财务利益相关者(SH)是谁。

方法

根据四种 SH 类型(国家、专款专用、运营商和成本依赖者)对博彩公司的收益表进行分类。将这些群体的支出与公司的总博彩收入(GGR)进行比较。

结果

总体而言,赌博背后的主要财务 SH 似乎是国家和专款专用受益者。国家预算和专款专用捐款占博彩公司 GGR 的平均 50%,而约三分之一的资金流向成本依赖者。可以确定的最大的成本依赖者群体是分销网络和材料供应商。结果还显示,不同公司之间存在机构背景差异。

结论

分析证实了国家和专款专用受益者作为欧洲博彩公司重要受益人的重要性。结果还表明,成本依赖者是赌博中一个重要的财务 SH。讨论了广泛的 SH 网络在赌博收入方面对公共卫生的影响。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder interests in gambling revenue: an obstacle to public health interventions?利益相关者对博彩收入的关注:公共卫生干预的障碍?
Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:102-106. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
2
On the efficiency of Nordic state-controlled gambling companies.论北欧国家控制的博彩公司的效率。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Jun;38(3):212-226. doi: 10.1177/1455072520968024. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
3
The changing epidemiology of gambling disorder and gambling-related harm: public health implications.赌博障碍和与赌博相关的危害的流行病学变化:公共卫生影响。
Public Health. 2020 Jul;184:41-45. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
Industry interests in gambling research: Lessons learned from other forms of hazardous consumption.产业界在赌博研究方面的利益:从其他形式的危险消费中吸取的教训。
Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;78:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
A tale of missed opportunities: pursuit of a public health approach to gambling in New Zealand.错失良机的故事:新西兰对赌博采取公共卫生方法的追求。
Addiction. 2012 Jun;107(6):1051-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03800.x.
6
Addressing gambling harms by reducing the supply of electronic gambling machines: a comparative study of Italy and Finland.通过减少电子赌博机的供应来解决赌博危害:意大利和芬兰的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 20;22(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13398-0.
7
Call to action for gambling disorder in the United States.美国针对赌博障碍的行动呼吁。
Addiction. 2018 Jun;113(6):1156-1158. doi: 10.1111/add.14225.
8
Preferences on policy options for ensuring the financial sustainability of health care services in the future: results of a stakeholder survey.未来确保医疗服务财务可持续性的政策选择偏好:利益相关者调查结果。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Dec;11(6):639-52. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0056-7.
9
Expansion of gambling in Canada: implications for health and social policy.加拿大赌博业的扩张:对健康和社会政策的影响。
CMAJ. 2000 Jul 11;163(1):61-4.
10
The development and implementation of electronic gambling machine policy: a qualitative study of local government policy makers.电子赌博机政策的制定与实施:地方政府政策制定者的定性研究。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2020 Oct;44(5):369-375. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13005. Epub 2020 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
'Industry still has too loud a voice': expert views on government policy consultations about gambling marketing.“行业的声音仍过于响亮”:专家对政府赌博营销政策咨询的看法
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jul 1;40(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf122.
2
Voluntary self-exclusion from gambling: Expert opinions on gaps and needs for improvement.自愿自我禁赌:关于差距与改进需求的专家意见
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2024 Oct;41(5):491-508. doi: 10.1177/14550725241264628. Epub 2024 Aug 9.
3
Channelling and taxation in European online gambling markets: evolution and policy implications.
欧洲在线赌博市场中的渠道与税收:演变及政策影响
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jan 3;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01145-0.
4
Institutional investment in addictive industries: an important commercial determinant of health.机构投资成瘾性产业:影响健康的重要商业决定因素。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;12:1409648. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1409648. eCollection 2024.
5
National burden of gambling in Japan: an estimation from an online-based cross-sectional investigation and national epidemiological survey.日本赌博的全国负担:基于在线横断面调查和全国流行病学调查的估计。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;24(1):1703. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19197-z.
6
Public opinions and attitudes toward a state monopoly: a study of the finnish gambling system.公众对国家垄断的意见和态度:对芬兰博彩制度的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 16;23(1):2012. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16917-9.
7
Protecting children and young people from contemporary marketing for gambling.保护儿童和青少年免受当代赌博营销的影响。
Health Promot Int. 2023 Apr 1;38(2). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac194.
8
Gambling policy positions of Finnish newspapers between 2004 and 2020: An automated content analysis.2004年至2020年芬兰报纸的赌博政策立场:自动内容分析
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2022 Dec;39(6):605-622. doi: 10.1177/14550725221083438. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
9
Addressing gambling harms by reducing the supply of electronic gambling machines: a comparative study of Italy and Finland.通过减少电子赌博机的供应来解决赌博危害:意大利和芬兰的比较研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 20;22(1):1016. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13398-0.
10
On the efficiency of Nordic state-controlled gambling companies.论北欧国家控制的博彩公司的效率。
Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2021 Jun;38(3):212-226. doi: 10.1177/1455072520968024. Epub 2020 Dec 11.