• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于原始数据和模型的迭代重建算法在心脏 CT 图像质量评估中的比较,重点是图像锐度。

Comparison of quantitative image quality of cardiac computed tomography between raw-data-based and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms with an emphasis on image sharpness.

机构信息

Asan Medical Center, Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.

出版信息

Pediatr Radiol. 2020 Oct;50(11):1570-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04741-x. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00247-020-04741-x
PMID:32591981
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Image sharpness is commonly degraded on cardiac CT images reconstructed using iterative reconstruction algorithms.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the image quality of cardiac CT between raw-data-based and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms developed by the same CT vendor in children and young adults with congenital heart disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 29 patients with congenital heart disease, we reconstructed 39 cardiac CT datasets using raw-data-based and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. We performed quantitative analysis of image sharpness using distance and angle on a line density profile across an edge of the descending thoracic aorta in addition to CT attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio. We compared these quantitative image-quality measures between the two algorithms.

RESULTS

CT attenuation did not show significant differences between the algorithms (P>0.05) except in the aorta. Image noise was small but significantly higher in the model-based algorithm than in the raw-data-based algorithm (4.8±2.3 Hounsfield units [HU] vs. 4.7±2.1 HU, P<0.014). Signal-to-noise ratio (110.2±50.9 vs. 108.4±50.4, P=0.050) and contrast-to-noise ratio (91.0±45.7 vs. 89.6±45.1, P=0.063) showed marginal significance between the two algorithms. The model-based algorithm showed a significantly smaller distance (1.4±0.4 mm vs. 1.6±0.3 mm, P<0.001) and a significantly higher angle (77.0±4.3° vs. 74.1±5.7°, P<0.001) than the raw-data-based algorithm.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the raw-data-based algorithm, the model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm demonstrated better image sharpness and higher image noise on cardiac CT in patients with congenital heart disease.

摘要

背景

在使用迭代重建算法重建的心脏 CT 图像中,图像锐度通常会降低。

目的

比较同一家 CT 供应商开发的基于原始数据和基于模型的迭代重建算法在患有先天性心脏病的儿童和年轻成人心脏 CT 中的图像质量。

材料与方法

在 29 例先天性心脏病患者中,我们使用基于原始数据和基于模型的迭代重建算法重建了 39 组心脏 CT 数据集。我们使用穿过降主动脉边缘的线密度轮廓对图像锐度进行了定量分析,除了 CT 衰减外,还包括图像噪声、信噪比和对比噪声比。我们比较了这两种算法之间的这些定量图像质量指标。

结果

除了主动脉外,两种算法的 CT 衰减没有显著差异(P>0.05)。图像噪声较小,但基于模型的算法明显高于基于原始数据的算法(4.8±2.3 亨氏单位[HU]与 4.7±2.1 HU,P<0.014)。信噪比(110.2±50.9 与 108.4±50.4,P=0.050)和对比噪声比(91.0±45.7 与 89.6±45.1,P=0.063)在两种算法之间显示出边缘显著性。基于模型的算法的距离(1.4±0.4mm 与 1.6±0.3mm,P<0.001)和角度(77.0±4.3°与 74.1±5.7°,P<0.001)明显小于基于原始数据的算法。

结论

与基于原始数据的算法相比,基于模型的迭代重建算法在患有先天性心脏病的患者的心脏 CT 中显示出更好的图像锐度和更高的图像噪声。

相似文献

1
Comparison of quantitative image quality of cardiac computed tomography between raw-data-based and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms with an emphasis on image sharpness.基于原始数据和模型的迭代重建算法在心脏 CT 图像质量评估中的比较,重点是图像锐度。
Pediatr Radiol. 2020 Oct;50(11):1570-1578. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04741-x. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Pediatric 320-row cardiac computed tomography using electrocardiogram-gated model-based full iterative reconstruction.采用基于心电图门控模型的完全迭代重建技术的儿科320排心脏计算机断层扫描
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Oct;47(11):1463-1470. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3901-2. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
3
Image quality of ct angiography using model-based iterative reconstruction in infants with congenital heart disease: Comparison with filtered back projection and hybrid iterative reconstruction.先天性心脏病婴儿中基于模型的迭代重建CT血管造影的图像质量:与滤波反投影和混合迭代重建的比较
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jan;86:190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Image quality of CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction in young children with congenital heart disease: comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.先天性心脏病幼儿基于模型的迭代重建CT血管造影的图像质量:与滤波反投影和自适应统计迭代重建的比较
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jun;31 Suppl 1:31-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0570-1. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
5
Assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm (SAFIRE) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets.评估迭代重建算法(SAFIRE)在儿科心脏 CT 数据集图像质量中的应用。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012 May-Jun;6(3):200-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
6
Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography.基于前投影模型的迭代重建解决方案算法对小儿心脏计算机断层扫描图像质量和辐射剂量的影响。
Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Nov;46(12):1663-1670. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3676-x. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography.基于知识的迭代模型重建在低千伏256层冠状动脉CT血管造影中的价值。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Mar-Apr;8(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jan 12.
8
Optimization of reduced-dose MDCT of thoracic aorta using iterative reconstruction.使用迭代重建技术优化胸部主动脉低剂量MDCT扫描
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2014 Jan-Feb;38(1):72-6. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a213cd.
9
Image quality of CT angiography in young children with congenital heart disease: a comparison between the sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) and advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE) algorithms.先天性心脏病幼儿CT血管造影的图像质量:正弦图确认迭代重建(SAFIRE)与高级模型迭代重建(ADMIRE)算法的比较
Clin Radiol. 2017 Dec;72(12):1060-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
10
CT iterative vs deep learning reconstruction: comparison of noise and sharpness.CT 迭代与深度学习重建:噪声与锐利度比较。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):3156-3164. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07358-8. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-dose lung CT: Optimizing diagnostic radiation dose - A phantom study.低剂量肺部CT:优化诊断辐射剂量——一项模体研究。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2024 Nov 24;13:100614. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100614. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Assessment of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on image quality in pediatric cardiac CT datasets type of manuscript: Original research.评估深度学习图像重建(DLIR)在儿科心脏 CT 数据集图像质量中的应用 稿件类型:原创研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0300090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300090. eCollection 2024.
3
Pulmonary Atresia with Intact Ventricular Septum: Correlation of Preoperative Computed Tomography-Derived Parameters with Echocardiographic Tricuspid Valve Z-Score and Surgical Outcomes.
室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁:术前计算机断层扫描衍生参数与超声心动图三尖瓣Z评分及手术结果的相关性
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03570-1.
4
Complimentary Cardiac Computed Tomography Ventricular Volumetry-Derived Metrics of Severity in Patients with Ebstein Anomaly: Comparison with Echocardiography-Based Severity Indices.伴有 Ebstein 畸形患者的心脏 CT 容积测量技术评估心功能严重程度的临床价值:与超声心动图严重程度指数的对比研究。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Jan;45(1):24-31. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03342-3. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
5
Recent technologies in cardiac imaging.心脏成像的最新技术。
Front Med Technol. 2023 Jan 10;4:984492. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2022.984492. eCollection 2022.
6
Intraindividual evaluation of effects of image filter function on image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影中图像滤波功能对图像质量影响的个体内评估。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 15;9:840735. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.840735. eCollection 2022.
7
Contrast-Enhanced CT Protocol for the Fontan Pathway: Comparison Between 1- and 3-Minute Scan Delays.用于Fontan循环路径的对比增强CT方案:1分钟与3分钟扫描延迟的比较
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Jun;43(5):1104-1113. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02830-2. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
8
Artificial Intelligence-Based Echocardiographic Left Atrial Volume Measurement with Pulmonary Vein Comparison.基于人工智能的与肺静脉比较的超声心动图左心房容积测量。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 6;2021:1336762. doi: 10.1155/2021/1336762. eCollection 2021.