• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用和验证一种调查工具来衡量英国医院中胰岛素处方安全干预措施的感知效果。

Use and validation of a survey tool to measure the perceived effectiveness of insulin prescribing safety interventions in UK hospitals.

机构信息

School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.

Department of Pharmacy, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2020 Dec;37(12):2027-2034. doi: 10.1111/dme.14351. Epub 2020 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1111/dme.14351
PMID:32592220
Abstract

AIMS

To describe the use and validation of a survey tool to elicit the opinion of hospital pharmacists and medicines safety officers in the UK regarding the perceived effectiveness of strategies to improve insulin prescribing safety in hospitals.

METHODS

One respondent from each participating organization completed the survey on behalf of the main acute hospital in their trust (n = 92). A five-point Likert scale was used to determine opinion on how effective 22 different interventions were at promoting insulin safety at the respondent's trust. The tool, the Perception of Effectiveness of Prescribing Safety Interventions for Insulin (PEPSII) questionnaire, underwent content validity testing. The reliability was estimated using Cronbach's alpha (α).

RESULTS

The PEPSII questionnaire demonstrated good reliability (α = 0.867). Outreach team review and mandatory insulin education were the highest-scoring interventions; the insulin passport was amongst the lowest scoring interventions. Most interventions were considered more effective by trusts using them compared to those who didn't, except for self-administration policies, electronic prescribing and the insulin passport.

CONCLUSIONS

The perceived effectiveness of a variety of insulin prescribing safety strategies in UK hospitals was described by leveraging a purposely developed survey tool. The results describe current levels of support for recommended interventions, and may facilitate the direction of both local and national insulin prescribing safety improvement efforts.

摘要

目的

描述一种调查工具的使用和验证情况,该工具旨在收集英国医院药剂师和药品安全官员对改善医院胰岛素处方安全策略的看法,以评估这些策略的有效性。

方法

每个参与组织的一名代表代表其信托机构的主要急性医院完成了这项调查(n=92)。采用 5 点李克特量表来确定受访者对 22 种不同干预措施在提高其信托机构胰岛素安全性方面的有效性的看法。该工具,即胰岛素处方安全干预措施的有效性感知(PEPSII)问卷,经过了内容有效性测试。使用 Cronbach's alpha(α)来评估可靠性。

结果

PEPSII 问卷具有良好的可靠性(α=0.867)。外展团队审查和强制性胰岛素教育是得分最高的干预措施;胰岛素护照是得分最低的干预措施之一。与未使用这些干预措施的信托机构相比,使用这些干预措施的信托机构认为大多数干预措施更有效,除了自我给药政策、电子处方和胰岛素护照。

结论

通过使用专门开发的调查工具,描述了英国医院中各种胰岛素处方安全策略的有效性。研究结果描述了当前对推荐干预措施的支持水平,并可能有助于指导本地和国家胰岛素处方安全改善工作的方向。

相似文献

1
Use and validation of a survey tool to measure the perceived effectiveness of insulin prescribing safety interventions in UK hospitals.使用和验证一种调查工具来衡量英国医院中胰岛素处方安全干预措施的感知效果。
Diabet Med. 2020 Dec;37(12):2027-2034. doi: 10.1111/dme.14351. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Strategies to reduce insulin prescribing errors in UK hospitals: results from a national survey.在英国医院减少胰岛素处方错误的策略:一项全国性调查的结果。
Diabet Med. 2020 Jul;37(7):1176-1184. doi: 10.1111/dme.14209. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
Safe and appropriate use of insulin and other antihyperglycemic agents in hospital.安全且合理地在医院使用胰岛素和其他抗高血糖药物。
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Apr;38(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.01.002.
4
Using standardized insulin orders to improve patient safety in a tertiary care centre.使用标准化胰岛素医嘱来提高三级护理中心的患者安全性。
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Apr;38(2):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.01.003.
5
Identification of risks associated with the prescribing and dispensing of oral anticancer medicines in Ireland.爱尔兰与开具和分发口服抗癌药物相关的风险识别。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2012 Dec;34(6):893-901. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9688-1. Epub 2012 Sep 9.
6
Pharmacists' role in ensuring safe and effective hospital use of insulin.药剂师在确保胰岛素在医院安全有效使用中的作用。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010 Aug;67(16 Suppl 8):S17-21. doi: 10.2146/ajhp100173.
7
Safety culture perceptions of pharmacists in Malaysian hospitals and health clinics: a multicentre assessment using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire.马来西亚医院和健康诊所药剂师的安全文化认知:使用安全态度问卷的多中心评估
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 26;5(11):e008889. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008889.
8
A Cross-sectional Analysis Investigating Organizational Factors That Influence Near-Miss Error Reporting Among Hospital Pharmacists.一项调查影响医院药剂师未遂差错报告的组织因素的横断面分析。
J Patient Saf. 2016 Jun;12(2):114-7. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000125.
9
Strategies for improving medication safety in hospitals: Evolution of clinical pharmacy services.提高医院用药安全性的策略:临床药学服务的演变。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Jul;15(7):873-882. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
10
Interventions to ensure medication safety in acute care: an umbrella review.干预措施以确保急性护理中的药物安全:伞式综述。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2020 Jun;18(2):188-211. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000232.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimising cardiac surgery outcomes in people with diabetes: the OCTOPuS pilot feasibility study.优化糖尿病患者心脏手术的预后:OCTOPuS试点可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(39):1-31. doi: 10.3310/POYW3311.
2
Exploring the complexity of safe insulin management during transfer of care using qualitative methods.运用定性方法探索护理转接过程中安全胰岛素管理的复杂性。
Diabet Med. 2025 Aug;42(8):e70054. doi: 10.1111/dme.70054. Epub 2025 May 5.
3
Time and risk preferences and the perceived effectiveness of incentives to comply with diabetic retinopathy screening among older adults with type 2 diabetes.
2型糖尿病老年患者的时间和风险偏好以及对遵守糖尿病视网膜病变筛查激励措施的感知效果。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1101909. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101909. eCollection 2023.