Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Neuromuscular Disease, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Research Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec;101(12):2087-2092. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.024. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
To verify the suitability and reliability of YouTube videos pertaining to the 5 most commonly used knee stability tests for educational purposes.
Cross-sectional observational study.
YouTube videos were categorized into 2 groups according to their sources: professional and nonprofessional groups. Only videos that satisfied the purpose and procedure parts among comprehensiveness scores were defined as suitable for educational purposes. For evaluating the reliability, the modified DISCERN was used. One-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Research on YouTube videos (N=218) from November 13, 2019, to November 17, 2019, was done using the following keywords: "anterior drawer test knee," "Lachman test knee," "posterior drawer test," "valgus knee test," and "varus knee test."
Not applicable.
Comprehensiveness score that focused on the purpose, procedure, interpretation, and limitations or precautions of the test were developed by the authors, and modified DISCERN score.
In terms of the suitability for educational purposes, 126 videos (58%) were classified into the suitable group, and 92 (42%) were classified into the unsuitable group. Neither group had significantly more views, views per posting days, likes, dislikes, or posting days. When comparing the comprehensiveness and reliability scores of each group, significant differences between groups were identified. Only 47 videos met the limitations/precautions category. A total of 155 videos (71%) were from the professional group and 63 videos (29%) were from the nonprofessional group. Significant differences were found in views, views per posting days, likes, and dislikes between the professional group and nonprofessional group.
YouTube should not be used for learning about knee stability tests. Professionals, especially those in rehabilitation medicine, should pay more attention to uploading high-quality videos with reliable content.
验证与 5 种最常用的膝关节稳定性测试相关的 YouTube 视频在教育方面的适用性和可靠性。
横断面观察性研究。
根据来源将 YouTube 视频分为专业组和非专业组:仅将满足全面性评分中目的和程序部分的视频定义为适合教育目的。为了评估可靠性,使用了改良的 DISCERN。采用单因素方差分析和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验分别比较连续变量和分类变量。
2019 年 11 月 13 日至 11 月 17 日,使用以下关键词对 YouTube 视频进行研究:“前抽屉试验膝关节”、“Lachman 试验膝关节”、“后抽屉试验”、“外翻试验膝关节”和“内翻试验膝关节”。
不适用。
作者制定了重点关注测试目的、程序、解释以及测试的局限性或注意事项的全面性评分和改良的 DISCERN 评分。
在教育适用性方面,126 个视频(58%)被归类为适用组,92 个视频(42%)被归类为不适用组。两组在观看次数、每天观看次数、点赞数、不喜欢数和发布天数方面均无显著差异。比较两组的全面性和可靠性评分,发现组间存在显著差异。仅有 47 个视频符合局限性/注意事项类别。共有 155 个视频(71%)来自专业组,63 个视频(29%)来自非专业组。在观看次数、每天观看次数、点赞数和不喜欢数方面,专业组与非专业组存在显著差异。
不应使用 YouTube 来学习膝关节稳定性测试。专业人士,特别是康复医学专业人士,应更加关注上传具有可靠内容的高质量视频。