Suppr超能文献

在 IVF/ICSI 前使用门诊宫腔镜进行子宫内膜搔刮损伤:一项随机对照试验。

Endometrial scratch injury with office hysteroscopy before IVF/ICSI: A randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegaard Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark; The Fertility Clinic, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegaard Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegaard Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Sep;252:112-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endometrial scratch injury (ESI) has been proposed to improve endometrial receptivity and thereby increase implantation rates in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. ESI has been widely incorporated into clinical practice despite inconclusive evidence of its effect on reproductive outcomes. We aimed to assess pregnancy and live birth rates in subfertile women receiving ESI before IVF treatment in comparison to controls.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) with no blinding of participants, investigators or health care personnel. Women in ART treatment were allocated to either office hysteroscopy with ESI (ESI group) or no intervention (control group). In total 184 women in IVF/ICSI treatment with minimum one previous failed IVF/ICSI cycle, were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome was positive serum hCG (s-hCG). Secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate. Only per-protocol analyses were performed as all patients included at one centre had to be excluded. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01743391.

RESULTS

Our results showed a non-significant increase in positive s-hCG (OR 1.23, 95 % CI (0.65-2.33)), ongoing pregnancy (OR 1.52, 95 % CI (0.73-3.17)), and live birth rates (OR 1.69, 95 % CI (0.78-3.64)) per randomised woman between the ESI and the control group.

CONCLUSION

We observed no significant differences in positive s-hCG or other reproductive outcomes in the ESI vs. the control group. While the crude estimates of positive reproductive outcomes were higher in the ESI group, statistical significance was not reached, and the study was not powered to show smaller differences. However, data from this study will be re-evaluated in the context of an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) of RCTs on ESI.

摘要

目的

子宫内膜搔刮术(ESI)被提出可改善子宫内膜容受性,从而提高辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗中的着床率。尽管其对生殖结局的影响尚无定论,但 ESI 已广泛应用于临床实践。我们旨在评估在接受 IVF 治疗前接受 ESI 的不孕女性与对照组相比的妊娠和活产率。

研究设计

这是一项随机对照试验(RCT),参与者、研究者和医疗保健人员均未设盲。ART 治疗中的女性被分配至行宫腔镜下 ESI(ESI 组)或不干预(对照组)。共有 184 名在 IVF/ICSI 治疗中至少有一次既往 IVF/ICSI 周期失败的女性纳入最终分析。主要结局是血清 hCG 阳性(s-hCG)。次要结局是持续妊娠和活产率。仅进行了意向性治疗分析,因为必须排除在一个中心纳入的所有患者。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT01743391。

结果

我们的结果显示,在 ESI 组和对照组之间,随机分配的女性的血清 hCG 阳性(OR 1.23,95%CI(0.65-2.33))、持续妊娠(OR 1.52,95%CI(0.73-3.17))和活产率(OR 1.69,95%CI(0.78-3.64))的增加无显著差异。

结论

我们观察到 ESI 组与对照组在 s-hCG 阳性或其他生殖结局方面无显著差异。虽然 ESI 组的阳性生殖结局的粗略估计值较高,但未达到统计学意义,且该研究没有足够的效能来显示更小的差异。然而,这项研究的数据将在 ESI 的 RCT 个体参与者数据荟萃分析(IPD-MA)中重新评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验