Sohn Yu-Mee, Na Dong Gyu, Paik Wooyul, Gwon Hye Yun, Noh Byeong-Joo
Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea.
Ultrasonography. 2021 Jan;40(1):115-125. doi: 10.14366/usg.20012. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
This study was conducted to determine the malignancy risk and diagnostic value of various types of nonshadowing echogenic foci (NEF) in the risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
A total of 1,018 consecutive thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) with final diagnoses were included. The presence of NEF was determined and types of NEF were classified according to the presence of a comet tail artifact (CTA), location, and size through a prospective evaluation. The associations with malignancy, malignancy risk, and diagnostic value of various types of NEF were assessed.
Intrasolid punctate NEF without CTA was the only type of NEF that was an independent predictor of malignancy (P<0.001). The malignancy risk of intrasolid punctate NEF without CTA was substantially higher in solid hypoechoic nodules than in isoechoic or nonsolid nodules (71.3% vs. 9.2%, P<0.001). In solid hypoechoic nodules, slightly increased sensitivity (70.8% vs. 67.9%) for malignancy and a similar malignancy risk (71.4% vs. 71.3%) were observed for intrasolid punctate NEF (with or without CTA) and intrasolid punctate NEF without CTA, respectively. NEF with CTA at the margin of the cystic component was not associated with malignancy or benignity in nonsolid nodules (P>0.05).
Intrasolid punctate NEF without CTA was the only independent predictor of malignancy. However, solid hypoechoic nodules with intrasolid punctate NEF should be classified as high-suspicion nodules regardless of coexisting CTA. Other types of NEF had no added value for detecting malignancy compared to intrasolid punctate NEF without CTA.
本研究旨在确定各类无回声晕的强回声灶(NEF)在甲状腺结节风险分层中的恶性风险及诊断价值。
纳入1018例最终确诊的连续甲状腺结节(≥1 cm)。通过前瞻性评估确定NEF的存在,并根据彗尾伪像(CTA)的存在、位置和大小对NEF类型进行分类。评估各类NEF与恶性肿瘤、恶性风险及诊断价值的相关性。
无CTA的实性点状NEF是唯一一种恶性肿瘤的独立预测因素(P<0.001)。无CTA的实性点状NEF在实性低回声结节中的恶性风险显著高于等回声或非实性结节(71.3%对9.2%,P<0.001)。在实性低回声结节中,无CTA的实性点状NEF(无论有无CTA)和无CTA的实性点状NEF对恶性肿瘤的敏感性略有增加(分别为70.8%对67.9%),恶性风险相似(71.4%对71.3%)。囊性成分边缘有CTA的NEF在非实性结节中与恶性或良性无关(P>0.05)。
无CTA的实性点状NEF是唯一的恶性独立预测因素。然而,无论是否存在CTA,有实性点状NEF的实性低回声结节应分类为高可疑结节。与无CTA的实性点状NEF相比,其他类型的NEF在检测恶性肿瘤方面没有附加价值。