• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可疑超声检查结果对中度可疑甲状腺结节进行亚分类。

Subcategorization of intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules based on suspicious ultrasonographic findings.

作者信息

Kim Haejung, Shin Jung Hee, Kim Ka Eun, Kim Myoung Kyoung, Oh Jiyun, Hahn Soo Yeon

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ultrasonography. 2023 Apr;42(2):307-313. doi: 10.14366/usg.22096. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

DOI:10.14366/usg.22096
PMID:36935593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10071054/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compared the malignancy risk of intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules according to the presence of suspicious ultrasonographic (US) findings.

METHODS

From January 2014 to December 2014, 299 consecutive intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules in 281 patients (mean age, 50.6±12.5 years) with final diagnoses were included in this study. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed the US findings and subcategorized the intermediate suspicion category into nodules without suspicious findings and nodules with suspicious findings, including punctate echogenic foci, nonparallel orientation, or irregular margins. The malignancy rates were compared between the two subcategory groups.

RESULTS

Of the 299 intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules, 230 (76.9%) were subcategorized as nodules without suspicious findings and 69 (23.1%) as nodules with suspicious findings. The total malignancy rate was 33.4% (100/299) and the malignancy rate of nodules with suspicious findings was significantly higher than that of nodules without suspicious findings (47.8% vs. 29.1%, P=0.004). In nodules with suspicious findings, the most common suspicious finding was punctate echogenic foci (48/82, 58.5%) followed by nonparallel orientation (22/82, 26.8%) and irregular margins (12/82, 14.6%). Thirteen nodules had two suspicious findings simultaneously. A linearly increasing trend in the malignancy rate was observed according to the number of suspicious US findings (P for trend=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules with suspicious findings showed a higher malignancy rate than those without suspicious findings. Further management guidelines for nodules with suspicious findings should differ from guidelines for nodules without suspicious findings, even in the same US category.

摘要

目的

本研究根据甲状腺结节超声检查(US)可疑表现的有无,比较中度可疑甲状腺结节的恶性风险。

方法

2014年1月至2014年12月,本研究纳入了281例最终确诊患者的299个连续的中度可疑甲状腺结节(平均年龄50.6±12.5岁)。两名放射科医生回顾性分析了超声检查结果,并将中度可疑类别细分为无可疑表现的结节和有可疑表现的结节,后者包括点状强回声灶、非平行方位或边界不规则。比较了两个亚组的恶性率。

结果

299个中度可疑甲状腺结节中,230个(76.9%)被归类为无可疑表现的结节,69个(23.1%)为有可疑表现的结节。总恶性率为33.4%(100/299),有可疑表现的结节的恶性率显著高于无可疑表现的结节(47.8%对29.1%,P = 0.004)。在有可疑表现的结节中,最常见的可疑表现是点状强回声灶(48/82,58.5%),其次是非平行方位(22/82,26.8%)和边界不规则(12/82,14.6%)。13个结节同时有两种可疑表现。根据超声可疑表现的数量,观察到恶性率呈线性增加趋势(趋势P = 0.001)。

结论

有可疑表现的中度可疑甲状腺结节的恶性率高于无可疑表现的结节。对于有可疑表现的结节,即使在相同的超声分类中,进一步的管理指南也应与无可疑表现的结节不同。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/49922c96f656/usg-22096f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/09a8e4fc8414/usg-22096f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/6ebb14b5413d/usg-22096f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/49922c96f656/usg-22096f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/09a8e4fc8414/usg-22096f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/6ebb14b5413d/usg-22096f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66ff/10071054/49922c96f656/usg-22096f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Subcategorization of intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules based on suspicious ultrasonographic findings.基于可疑超声检查结果对中度可疑甲状腺结节进行亚分类。
Ultrasonography. 2023 Apr;42(2):307-313. doi: 10.14366/usg.22096. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
2
Role of echogenic foci in ultrasonographic risk stratification of thyroid nodules: Echogenic focus scoring in the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.甲状腺结节超声风险分层中强回声灶的作用:美国放射学会甲状腺影像报告和数据系统中的强回声灶评分
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 29;12:929500. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.929500. eCollection 2022.
3
Thyroid Nodules With Nondiagnostic Cytologic Results: Follow-Up Management Using Ultrasound Patterns Based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines.甲状腺结节伴有非诊断性细胞学结果:基于 2015 年美国甲状腺协会指南的超声模式随访管理。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):412-417. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18532. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
4
Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study.K-TIRADS中度可疑甲状腺结节的恶性风险分层及亚分类:一项回顾性多中心研究
Ultrasonography. 2024 Mar;43(2):132-140. doi: 10.14366/usg.23203. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
5
Impact of Nodule Size on Malignancy Risk Differs according to the Ultrasonography Pattern of Thyroid Nodules.结节大小对恶性风险的影响因甲状腺结节的超声模式而异。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 May-Jun;19(3):534-541. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.534. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
6
Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Comparison between the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and the 2014 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines.甲状腺结节恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与 2014 年美国甲状腺协会管理指南的比较。
Radiology. 2016 Mar;278(3):917-24. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150056. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
7
Repeat Diagnoses of Bethesda Category III Thyroid Nodules: What To Do Next?贝塞斯达Ⅲ类甲状腺结节的重复诊断:接下来该怎么做?
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 26;10(6):e0130138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130138. eCollection 2015.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.超声 K-TIRADS 分类与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节及滤泡性肿瘤良恶性危险分层中的诊断效能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):444-450. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20961. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
9
Echogenic foci in thyroid nodules: diagnostic performance with combination of TIRADS and echogenic foci.甲状腺结节中的强回声灶:TIRADS与强回声灶联合应用的诊断效能
BMC Med Imaging. 2019 Apr 4;19(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12880-019-0328-2.
10
Ultrasound risk stratification for malignancy using the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Children with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.采用2015年美国甲状腺协会《儿童甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌管理指南》对恶性肿瘤进行超声风险分层。
Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Apr;47(4):429-436. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3780-6. Epub 2017 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Inconclusive cytology results of fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules: the importance of strict guideline implementation.甲状腺结节细针穿刺的不确定细胞学结果:严格执行指南的重要性。
Ultrasonography. 2025 Jul;44(4):285-293. doi: 10.14366/usg.24216. Epub 2025 May 13.
2
Malignant risk of thyroid nodules with isolated macrocalcifications - A study based on surgery results.孤立性粗大钙化甲状腺结节的恶性风险——一项基于手术结果的研究
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 Apr 24;80:100657. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100657. eCollection 2025.
3
Thermal ablation for Bethesda III and IV thyroid nodules: current diagnosis and management.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations.2021 年韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统及基于影像学的甲状腺结节管理:韩国甲状腺放射学会共识声明和建议。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Dec;22(12):2094-2123. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0713. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Thyroid Malignancy: A Multicenter Validation Study.改良版韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能:一项多中心验证研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1579-1586. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0230. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
3
贝塞斯达Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级甲状腺结节的热消融:当前的诊断与管理
Ultrasonography. 2024 Nov;43(6):395-406. doi: 10.14366/usg.24083. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Evolutionary analysis of indeterminate cytology and risk of malignancy in a thyroid nodule unit.甲状腺结节单元中不确定细胞学及恶性风险的进化分析
Eur Thyroid J. 2024 May 1;13(3). doi: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0076.
5
Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study.K-TIRADS中度可疑甲状腺结节的恶性风险分层及亚分类:一项回顾性多中心研究
Ultrasonography. 2024 Mar;43(2):132-140. doi: 10.14366/usg.23203. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
6
Re: Subdivision of intermediate suspicion, the 2021 K-TIRADS, and category III, indeterminate cytology, the 2017 TBSRTC, 2nd edition, in thyroidology: let bygones be bygones?关于甲状腺学中中等怀疑度的细分、2021年K-TIRADS以及2017年第二版《甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TBSRTC)》中的III类、细胞学结果不确定:既往之事,就让它过去?
Ultrasonography. 2023 Oct;42(4):602-603. doi: 10.14366/usg.23172. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
7
Subdivision of intermediate suspicion, the 2021 K-TIRADS, and category III, indeterminate cytology, the 2017 TBSRTC, 2nd edition, in thyroidology: let bygones be bygones?甲状腺学中2021年K-TIRADS的中度可疑细分以及2017年第二版TBSRTC的III类、细胞学结果不确定:既往不咎?
Ultrasonography. 2023 Oct;42(4):600-601. doi: 10.14366/usg.23113. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy with three international guidelines.
改良版韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能与三项国际指南的比较。
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):594-601. doi: 10.14366/usg.21056. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
4
Diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy according to nodule size: a comparison with five society guidelines.根据结节大小评估改良韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断效能:与五项学会指南的比较
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):474-485. doi: 10.14366/usg.20148. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
5
Unnecessary thyroid nodule biopsy rates under four ultrasound risk stratification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.四种超声风险分层系统下甲状腺结节不必要活检率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2877-2885. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07384-6. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
6
Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture.基于低回声程度和回声纹理的甲状腺结节超声恶性风险分层。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1653-1663. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06527-8. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
Similarities and Differences Between Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的异同
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):W76-W84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20510. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
8
Diagnostic Performance of Practice Guidelines for Thyroid Nodules: Thyroid Nodule Size versus Biopsy Rates.甲状腺结节临床实践指南的诊断性能:甲状腺结节大小与活检率。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):92-99. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181723. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
9
2017 Thyroid Radiofrequency Ablation Guideline: Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology.2017 年甲状腺射频消融治疗指南:韩国甲状腺放射学会。
Korean J Radiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;19(4):632-655. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.632. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
10
Comparison of Performance Characteristics of American College of Radiology TI-RADS, Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, and American Thyroid Association Guidelines.美国放射学院 TI-RADS、韩国甲状腺放射学会 TIRADS 和美国甲状腺协会指南的性能特征比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):1148-1154. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18822. Epub 2018 Apr 9.