• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Service users' experiences of contacting NHS patient medicines helpline services: a qualitative study.服务使用者拨打英国国家医疗服务体系患者用药咨询热线服务的体验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e036326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036326.
2
Pharmacy professionals' views regarding the future of NHS patient medicines helpline services: a multimethod qualitative study.药剂师专业人士对国民保健服务患者用药咨询热线服务未来的看法:一项多方法定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06144-6.
3
Pharmacy professionals' experiences and perceptions of providing NHS patient medicines helpline services: a qualitative study.药学专业人员提供国民保健服务患者用药咨询热线服务的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05182-w.
4
A systematic review examining the characteristics of users of NHS patient medicines helpline services, and the types of enquiries they make.一项系统评价研究考察了 NHS 患者药品咨询热线服务使用者的特征,以及他们提出的咨询类型。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Nov;27(6):323-329. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-002001. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
5
Operating a patient medicines helpline: a survey study exploring current practice in England using the RE-AIM evaluation framework.运营患者用药求助热线:一项使用RE-AIM评估框架探索英格兰当前实践的调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3690-9.
6
Barriers and facilitators to using NHS Direct: a qualitative study of 'users' and 'non-users'.使用国民保健服务直接热线的障碍与促进因素:一项针对“使用者”和“非使用者”的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 25;14:487. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0487-3.
7
Staff perceptions of prescription and over-the-counter drug dependence services in England: a qualitative study.英格兰地区医护人员对处方药和非处方药成瘾服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Nov 12;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0170-4.
8
Crisis resolution and home treatment: stakeholders' views on critical ingredients and implementation in England.危机解决与居家治疗:利益相关者对英格兰关键要素及实施情况的看法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1421-0.
9
A systematic review examining the effectiveness of medicines information services for patients and the general public.一项针对患者和普通公众的药品信息服务有效性的系统评价。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Feb;28(1):26-40. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
10
What does 'safe care' mean in the context of community-based mental health services? A qualitative exploration of the perspectives of service users, carers, and healthcare providers in England.在社区心理健康服务背景下,“安全护理”是什么意思?对英格兰的服务使用者、照顾者和医疗保健提供者的观点进行的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):1053. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11473-3.

引用本文的文献

1
What do users want from rheumatology telephone advice lines? A cross-sectional survey with the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society.用户对风湿病电话咨询热线有哪些需求?一项与英国国家类风湿关节炎协会合作开展的横断面调查。
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2025 Aug 12;9(3):rkaf095. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaf095. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient preferences for the provision of NHS medicines helpline services: a discrete choice experiment.患者对国民保健署药品求助热线服务提供方式的偏好:一项离散选择实验
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Oct 1;17(1):2404973. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2404973. eCollection 2024.
3
Developing a WhatsApp hotline for female entertainment workers in Cambodia: a qualitative study.为柬埔寨女性娱乐工作者开通WhatsApp热线:一项定性研究。
Mhealth. 2022 Jan 20;8:5. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-21-12. eCollection 2022.
4
Pharmacy professionals' views regarding the future of NHS patient medicines helpline services: a multimethod qualitative study.药剂师专业人士对国民保健服务患者用药咨询热线服务未来的看法:一项多方法定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06144-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacy professionals' experiences and perceptions of providing NHS patient medicines helpline services: a qualitative study.药学专业人员提供国民保健服务患者用药咨询热线服务的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 29;20(1):364. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05182-w.
2
Impact of pharmacy medicine information service advice on clinician and patient outcomes: an overview.药学信息服务建议对临床医生和患者结局的影响:概述。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Dec;36(4):299-317. doi: 10.1111/hir.12270. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
3
A systematic review examining the effectiveness of medicines information services for patients and the general public.一项针对患者和普通公众的药品信息服务有效性的系统评价。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2020 Feb;28(1):26-40. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12571. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
The patient experience in a community pharmacy mental illness and addictions program.社区药房精神疾病与成瘾项目中的患者体验。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2019 Apr 9;152(3):186-192. doi: 10.1177/1715163519839424. eCollection 2019 May-Jun.
5
Operating a patient medicines helpline: a survey study exploring current practice in England using the RE-AIM evaluation framework.运营患者用药求助热线:一项使用RE-AIM评估框架探索英格兰当前实践的调查研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):868. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3690-9.
6
A systematic review of the nature of dispensing errors in hospital pharmacies.医院药房调配差错性质的系统评价。
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2016 Jan 12;5:1-10. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S95733. eCollection 2016.
7
Cross-sectional survey of patients' need for information and support with medicines after discharge from hospital.出院后患者对药物信息及支持需求的横断面调查。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2018 Oct;26(5):433-441. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12411. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Patients' knowledge of new medicines after discharge from hospital: What are the effects of hospital-based discharge counseling and community-based medicines use reviews (MURs)?患者出院后对新药的了解:医院出院咨询和社区药物使用审查(MUR)的效果如何?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 May-Jun;13(3):628-633. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 13.
9
A qualitative study of patient experiences of Type 2 Diabetes care delivered comparatively by General Practice Nurses and Medical Practitioners.一项关于全科护士和执业医生相对提供2型糖尿病护理的患者体验的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jul;25(13-14):1977-86. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13219.
10
Iterative categorization (IC): a systematic technique for analysing qualitative data.迭代分类法(IC):一种用于分析定性数据的系统技术。
Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):1096-106. doi: 10.1111/add.13314. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

服务使用者拨打英国国家医疗服务体系患者用药咨询热线服务的体验:一项定性研究。

Service users' experiences of contacting NHS patient medicines helpline services: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Psychology and Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 28;10(6):e036326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036326.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036326
PMID:32595161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7322281/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) are available from some National Health Service (NHS) Trusts in the UK to provide medicines information to hospital patients and carers. To date, studies of PMHS have examined the views of service users via satisfaction surveys. This study used qualitative methods to explore service users' experiences of using a PMHS, including perceived benefits and areas for improvement.

DESIGN

Qualitative, using semi-structured interviews.

SETTING

This study was conducted across seven NHS Trusts in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty users of PMHS were individually interviewed over the telephone. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using Braun and Clarke's inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained before study commencement.

RESULTS

Participants predominantly called a PMHS for themselves (82%; carers: 18%). Two main themes were generated. -PMHS provide support during the uncertain transition of care period from hospital to home, when patients and carers often feel vulnerable because support is less available. PMHS met service users' needs for timely and easily accessible support, and quick resolution of their issues. PMHS could be improved with staffing beyond typical work week hours, and by having staff available to answer calls instead of using an answerphone. -PMHS were perceived as best-placed to answer enquiries that arose from hospital care. Service users felt reassured from speaking to pharmacy professionals, and PMHS were perceived as the optimal service in terms of knowledge and expertise regarding medicines-related questions. However, several participants were initially unaware that their PMHS existed.

CONCLUSIONS

PMHS are perceived to be a valuable means of accessing timely medicines-related support when patients and carers may be feeling particularly vulnerable. However, their availability and promotion could be improved. We recommend that providers of PMHS consider whether this is achievable, in order to better meet the needs of service users.

摘要

目的

英国一些国民保健服务(NHS)信托机构提供患者用药咨询服务(PMHS),为医院患者及其护理人员提供药物信息。迄今为止,PMHS 的研究通过满意度调查考察了服务使用者的观点。本研究采用定性方法探讨了服务使用者使用 PMHS 的体验,包括感知到的益处和改进领域。

设计

定性,采用半结构式访谈。

地点

本研究在英格兰的 7 个 NHS 信托机构进行。

参与者

通过电话对 40 名 PMHS 用户进行了个体访谈。对访谈进行了录音、逐字转录,并使用 Braun 和 Clarke 的归纳反思主题分析进行了分析。在研究开始前获得了伦理批准。

结果

参与者主要为自己(82%;护理人员:18%)拨打 PMHS。生成了两个主要主题。-PMHS 在从医院到家庭的不确定护理过渡期内提供支持,患者及其护理人员在这段时间内通常感到脆弱,因为支持较少。PMHS 满足了服务使用者对及时、易于获取的支持以及快速解决问题的需求。PMHS 可以通过在典型工作周之外增加人员配备,并通过配备工作人员接听电话而不是使用答录机来改进。-PMHS 被认为是回答与医院护理相关查询的最佳选择。与药剂专业人员交谈使服务使用者感到安心,PMHS 在药物相关问题的知识和专业知识方面被认为是最佳服务。然而,一些参与者最初并不知道他们的 PMHS 存在。

结论

PMHS 被认为是在患者及其护理人员可能感到特别脆弱时获取及时药物相关支持的有价值手段。然而,其可用性和推广可以得到改善。我们建议 PMHS 的提供者考虑这是否可行,以便更好地满足服务使用者的需求。