Lee Myung Hoon, Chung Dong Sun, Moon Duk Soo, Kwack Young Sook
Raon Psychiatric Clinic, Incheon, Korea.
W Psychiatric Clinic, Seongnam, Korea.
Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2020 Apr 1;31(2):53-57. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.200005.
This article reviews a wide range of literature on the standards and process of child custody evaluation in the US, and proposes custody evaluation standards appropriate to Korea. Custody evaluation refers to the process of making psychiatric and psychological evaluations of each parent and the child during a custody dispute and presenting to the family court a report of custody evaluation with the aim of safeguarding the best interests of the child. In the past, it was thought that children arethe fathers' possessions or that younger children should be raised by the mother; however, currently, custody rights are evaluated in accordance with the principle of the best interests of the child. The principle is all-encompassing and vague and hence, the court makes increasingly more requests to mental health professionals for custody evaluation. Since the Seoul Family Court introduced the expert consultation system in 2017, the involvement of mental health professionals in child custody decisions has increased in Korea. Custody evaluators should try to be neutral and find the objective facts, keeping in mind that their role is to aid the court in making a custody decision.
本文回顾了大量关于美国儿童监护权评估标准和流程的文献,并提出了适用于韩国的监护权评估标准。监护权评估是指在监护权纠纷期间,对父母双方及子女进行精神病学和心理学评估,并向家庭法院提交监护权评估报告,目的是保护儿童的最大利益。过去,人们认为孩子是父亲的财产,或者年幼的孩子应由母亲抚养;然而,目前,监护权是根据儿童最大利益原则进行评估的。这一原则包罗万象且模糊不清,因此,法院越来越多地要求心理健康专业人员进行监护权评估。自2017年首尔家庭法院引入专家咨询系统以来,韩国心理健康专业人员在儿童监护权决策中的参与度有所提高。监护权评估人员应努力保持中立,找出客观事实,牢记其职责是协助法院做出监护权决定。