Suppr超能文献

使用电子健康干预措施治疗饮食失调患者的随机对照试验综述。

Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders.

作者信息

Ahmadiankalati Mojtaba, Steins-Loeber Sabine, Paslakis Georgios

机构信息

Eating Disorders Unit, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 12;11:568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00568. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a world of technological advancements, electronic devices and services seem to be a promising way to increase patients' engagement in treatment and to help manage their symptoms. Here, we identified and analyzed the current evidence of RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of e-health interventions in the eating disorder (ED) field.

METHODS

We screened an initial cluster of 581 papers. In the end, 12 RCTs in clinical ED cohorts were included.

RESULTS

Some studies were conceived as stand-alone interventions, while others were presented as add-ons to ED-specific treatments. Studies varied in the type of EDs under investigation and in the e-health intervention applied (with vs. without therapist support vs. blended interventions; smartphone- vs. web-based). Only four studies reported explicit acceptability measures. Out of those, two reported high acceptability, one reported low acceptability, and one reported no significant difference in acceptability between groups. Four studies reported higher effectiveness of the e-health intervention compared to the control condition, e.g., reduction in maladaptive eating behaviors. Regarding control groups, three used a wait list design and nine had another kind of intervention (e.g., face-to-face CBT, or treatment as usual) as control.

DISCUSSION

So far, the evidence for acceptability and effectiveness of e-health interventions in EDs is very limited. There is also a lack of studies in older patients, adolescents, men, sexual and ethnic minorities. Shame/stigma is discussed in the context of e-health interventions for EDs. It remains unclear how severity of EDs affects the effectiveness of e-health interventions, how patients can channel the knowledge they acquire from e-health interventions into their actual behaviors, and how such interventions can better fit the needs of the individual patient to increase acceptability and effectiveness.

摘要

背景

在技术进步的时代,电子设备和服务似乎是提高患者治疗参与度并帮助管理其症状的一种有前景的方式。在此,我们识别并分析了随机对照试验(RCT)的现有证据,以评估电子健康干预措施在饮食失调(ED)领域的有效性和可接受性。

方法

我们初步筛选了581篇论文。最终,纳入了12项针对临床ED队列的随机对照试验。

结果

一些研究被设计为独立干预措施,而其他研究则作为ED特定治疗的补充。所研究的ED类型以及应用的电子健康干预措施各不相同(有治疗师支持与无治疗师支持与混合干预;基于智能手机与基于网络)。只有四项研究报告了明确的可接受性测量指标。其中,两项报告了高可接受性,一项报告了低可接受性,一项报告两组之间在可接受性方面无显著差异。四项研究报告称,与对照条件相比,电子健康干预措施具有更高的有效性,例如,不良饮食行为减少。关于对照组,三项采用了等待列表设计,九项采用了另一种干预措施(如面对面认知行为疗法或常规治疗)作为对照。

讨论

到目前为止,电子健康干预措施在ED中的可接受性和有效性证据非常有限。在老年患者、青少年、男性、性少数群体和少数族裔中也缺乏相关研究。羞耻感/污名化在ED的电子健康干预背景下被讨论。目前尚不清楚ED的严重程度如何影响电子健康干预措施的有效性,患者如何将从电子健康干预措施中获得的知识转化为实际行为,以及此类干预措施如何更好地满足个体患者的需求以提高可接受性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/69f8/7304304/e31cf37f8949/fpsyt-11-00568-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验