• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智能手机应用程序自我监测与传统纸质记录在强化门诊饮食失调治疗环境中的疗效和可接受性。

Efficacy and acceptability of self-monitoring via a smartphone application versus traditional paper records in an intensive outpatient eating disorder treatment setting.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Eating Disorder Program, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 Jul;28(4):473-479. doi: 10.1002/erv.2727. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1002/erv.2727
PMID:32050044
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although self-monitoring is an important part of eating disorder treatment, non-adherence is commonly observed among patients asked to maintain paper food records. This study aims to compare the efficacy and acceptability of electronic self-monitoring via Recovery Record to self-monitoring via traditional paper records, in an intensive outpatient (IOP) eating disorder treatment for adults.

METHOD

Ninety patients were recruited from an IOP eating disorder clinic and randomly assigned to the experimental or control condition. Those in the control condition received the standard treatment delivered by the IOP programme, including the use of paper records for self-monitoring. Those in the experimental condition received the same treatment but used Recovery Record for self-monitoring.

RESULTS

The results did not demonstrate statistically significant group differences over time on eating disorder symptomatology, and there were no statistically significant group differences on acceptability or adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot efficacy data do not support superiority of the app over paper records in an IOP setting, so proceeding to a larger efficacy trial is not warranted. Future studies should aim to determine whether the app is efficacious as an adjunct to less intensive treatment or to further explore adherence and acceptability outcomes in studies with larger sample sizes.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02484794.

摘要

目的

尽管自我监测是饮食失调治疗的重要组成部分,但要求患者维持纸质食物记录时,通常会观察到不依从的情况。本研究旨在比较通过 Recovery Record 进行电子自我监测与通过传统纸质记录进行自我监测,在成人强化门诊(IOP)饮食失调治疗中的疗效和可接受性。

方法

从 IOP 饮食失调诊所招募了 90 名患者,并将其随机分配到实验组或对照组。对照组接受 IOP 计划提供的标准治疗,包括使用纸质记录进行自我监测。实验组接受相同的治疗,但使用 Recovery Record 进行自我监测。

结果

研究结果未显示在饮食失调症状学方面,随时间的组间差异具有统计学意义,且在可接受性或依从性方面也没有统计学意义的组间差异。

结论

我们的初步疗效数据不支持在 IOP 环境中,应用程序优于纸质记录,因此没有必要进行更大规模的疗效试验。未来的研究应旨在确定该应用程序作为较不密集治疗的辅助手段是否有效,或在更大样本量的研究中进一步探讨依从性和可接受性结果。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02484794。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and acceptability of self-monitoring via a smartphone application versus traditional paper records in an intensive outpatient eating disorder treatment setting.智能手机应用程序自我监测与传统纸质记录在强化门诊饮食失调治疗环境中的疗效和可接受性。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 Jul;28(4):473-479. doi: 10.1002/erv.2727. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Effect of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring via a Smartphone Hypertension Coaching Application or Tracking Application on Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.智能手机高血压管理应用程序中的家庭血压监测或跟踪应用程序对血压控制不佳的成年人的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200255. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0255.
3
Development of a smartphone application for eating disorder self-monitoring.开发用于饮食失调自我监测的智能手机应用程序。
Int J Eat Disord. 2015 Nov;48(7):972-82. doi: 10.1002/eat.22386. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
4
Introducing Dietary Self-Monitoring to Undergraduate Women via a Calorie Counting App Has No Effect on Mental Health or Health Behaviors: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.通过一款卡路里计数应用程序向本科女生介绍饮食自我监测对心理健康或健康行为没有影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Dec;121(12):2377-2388. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.06.311. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
5
The Use of Wireless, Smartphone App-Assisted Home Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Hypertensive Patients in Singapore: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.新加坡高血压患者中使用无线、智能手机应用程序辅助家庭血压监测:初步随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 28;7(5):e13153. doi: 10.2196/13153.
6
Comparing a Tailored Self-Help Mobile App With a Standard Self-Monitoring App for the Treatment of Eating Disorder Symptoms: Randomized Controlled Trial.比较一款定制的自助式移动应用程序与一款标准自我监测应用程序对饮食失调症状的治疗效果:随机对照试验。
JMIR Ment Health. 2019 Nov 21;6(11):e14972. doi: 10.2196/14972.
7
Perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone application for the treatment of binge eating disorders: Qualitative feedback from a user population and clinicians.关于一款用于治疗暴饮暴食症的智能手机应用程序的可行性和可接受性的认知:来自用户群体和临床医生的定性反馈
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):808-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
The iCanCope pain self-management application for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.《iCanCope 青少年特发性关节炎疼痛自我管理应用程序:一项试点随机对照试验》。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 Jan 5;60(1):196-206. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa178.
9
Comparing Self-Monitoring Strategies for Weight Loss in a Smartphone App: Randomized Controlled Trial.比较智能手机应用程序中用于减肥的自我监测策略:随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 28;7(2):e12209. doi: 10.2196/12209.
10
Group-Based Compassion-Focused Therapy as an Adjunct to Outpatient Treatment for Eating Disorders: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.基于团体的以同情为中心的疗法作为饮食失调门诊治疗的辅助手段:一项试点随机对照试验。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Mar;24(2):475-487. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2018. Epub 2016 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse events in clinical trials of mental health apps.心理健康应用程序临床试验中不良事件的系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Dec 18;7(1):363. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01388-y.
2
Acute Augmentations to Psychological Therapies in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.进食障碍心理治疗的急性增效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2024 Sep;26(9):447-459. doi: 10.1007/s11920-024-01519-y. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
3
Cognitive training via mobile app for addressing eating disorders' cognitions in adolescents: a randomized control trial protocol.
通过移动应用程序进行认知训练以解决青少年饮食失调认知问题的随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 14;12(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01772-z.
4
A Serious Game for Patients With Eating Disorders (Maze Out): Pilot User Experience and Acceptance Study.一款针对饮食失调患者的严肃游戏(走出迷宫):初步用户体验与接受度研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jan 27;7:e40594. doi: 10.2196/40594.
5
What was the impact of a global pandemic (COVID-19) lockdown period on experiences within an eating disorder service? A service evaluation of the views of patients, parents/carers and staff.全球大流行(新冠疫情)封锁期对饮食失调服务机构内的体验有何影响?一项关于患者、家长/照料者及工作人员观点的服务评估。
J Eat Disord. 2021 Jan 19;9(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00368-x.
6
Patient use of a self-monitoring app during eating disorder treatment: Naturalistic longitudinal cohort study.患者在饮食失调治疗期间使用自我监测应用程序:自然纵向队列研究。
Brain Behav. 2021 Apr;11(4):e02039. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2039. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
7
Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders.使用电子健康干预措施治疗饮食失调患者的随机对照试验综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 12;11:568. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00568. eCollection 2020.
8
COVID-19 and implications for eating disorders.2019冠状病毒病及其对饮食失调的影响。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 May;28(3):239-245. doi: 10.1002/erv.2738.