• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭支持项目“Chancenreich”对学前儿童家长参与度和语言技能的纵向影响。

Longitudinal Effects of the Family Support Program Chancenreich on Parental Involvement and the Language Skills of Preschool Children.

作者信息

Cohen Franziska, Schünke Juliane, Vogel Eric, Anders Yvonne

机构信息

Lehrstuhl für Elementar- und Familienpädagogik, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.

Arbeitsbereich Frühkindliche Bildung und Erziehung, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01282. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01282
PMID:32595568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7304322/
Abstract

When they enter primary school children already vary significantly in their language skills, depending at least in part on their family's social background. In particular, the home learning environment plays a significant role in children's development. For that reason, early intervention programs have been developed to obviate learning difficulties and to promote health, children's development, and educational equality. The family support program Chancenreich aims to encourage the interaction and relationship between parents and children through two different course formats. The present study examines the longitudinal effects of attending the Chancenreich program and different course formats on (a) parents attending further educational services for children after completing the program, (b) children's vocabulary and level of grammar development at the age of 5 and (c) the children's vocabulary development between the ages of 3 and 5. Furthermore, we examine the relationship between family characteristics and the attendance rates of different course formats of the Chancenreich program at the first and second point of measurement. The study follows a longitudinal design with two points of measurements (T1: M = 41 months, T2: M = 68 months), and a sample size of 121 parents and their children at T2 in the intervention group and 41 parents and their children in the comparison group. Findings indicate that attendance of the Chancenreich program's courses is related to child and family characteristics and to later patterns of course participation after completing the program. Further, both children's level of vocabulary skills (PPVT) at the age of 5 and their development between the ages of 3 and 5 benefit from the parental participation in parenting skills training at the age of 3. Implications and future research on the effectiveness of family support programs are discussed.

摘要

儿童进入小学时,其语言技能就已存在显著差异,这至少部分取决于家庭的社会背景。特别是家庭学习环境在儿童发展中起着重要作用。因此,已制定早期干预计划,以消除学习困难,促进健康、儿童发展和教育公平。家庭支持项目Chancenreich旨在通过两种不同的课程形式鼓励父母与孩子之间的互动和关系。本研究考察了参加Chancenreich项目及不同课程形式对以下方面的纵向影响:(a)项目结束后父母参加儿童继续教育服务的情况;(b)儿童5岁时的词汇量和语法发展水平;(c)儿童3至5岁期间的词汇发展情况。此外,我们还考察了家庭特征与Chancenreich项目不同课程形式在第一次和第二次测量时的出勤率之间的关系。该研究采用纵向设计,有两个测量点(T1:平均年龄41个月,T2:平均年龄68个月),干预组在T2时有121对父母及其子女,对照组有41对父母及其子女。研究结果表明,参加Chancenreich项目的课程与儿童和家庭特征以及项目结束后的后续课程参与模式有关。此外,父母在孩子3岁时参与育儿技能培训,对孩子5岁时的词汇技能水平(PPVT)及其3至5岁期间的发展都有好处。文中还讨论了家庭支持项目有效性的相关启示和未来研究方向。

相似文献

1
Longitudinal Effects of the Family Support Program Chancenreich on Parental Involvement and the Language Skills of Preschool Children.家庭支持项目“Chancenreich”对学前儿童家长参与度和语言技能的纵向影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 12;11:1282. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01282. eCollection 2020.
2
Associations between responsive parental behaviours in infancy and toddlerhood, and language outcomes at age 7 years in a population-based sample.在基于人群的样本中,婴儿期和幼儿期反应性父母行为与 7 岁时语言结果之间的关联。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1098-1112. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12846. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
What Impacts Early Language Skills? Effects of Social Disparities and Different Process Characteristics of the Home Learning Environment in the First 2 Years.哪些因素会影响早期语言技能?社会差异及家庭学习环境在前两年的不同过程特征的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 8;11:557751. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557751. eCollection 2020.
4
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
5
Association of proximal elements of social disadvantage with children's language development at 2 years: an analysis of data from the Children in Focus (CiF) sample from the ALSPAC birth cohort.社会劣势近端因素与儿童 2 岁时语言发展的关联:来自 ALSPAC 出生队列儿童聚焦(CiF)样本的数据分析。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):362-376. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12442. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
6
Longitudinal relations among household chaos, SES, and effortful control in the prediction of language skills in early childhood.家庭混乱、社会经济地位和努力控制在预测幼儿语言技能方面的纵向关系。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Apr;56(4):727-738. doi: 10.1037/dev0000896. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Data on Singapore longitudinal early development study (SG-LEADS).新加坡纵向早期发展研究(SG-LEADS)的数据。
Data Brief. 2024 Feb 17;53:110203. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110203. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Supporting second language acquisition of bilingual preschool children through professionalization of caregivers in specialized preschool programs.通过专业化的学前特殊教育项目中照顾者的专业素养来支持双语学前儿童的第二语言习得。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 23;14:1149447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149447. eCollection 2023.
9
The impact of early-years provision in Children's Centres (EPICC) on child cognitive and socio-emotional development: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.儿童中心早期服务(EPICC)对儿童认知和社会情感发展的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 22;19(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2700-x.
10
Parental use of spatial language and gestures in early childhood.父母在幼儿时期使用空间语言和手势。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2019 Jun;37(2):149-167. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12263. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of socio-family variables on parental assessment of the pragmatic development of children under 4 years of age.社会家庭变量对4岁以下儿童语用能力发展的家长评估的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 30;15:1369949. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1369949. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A meta-analysis of home visiting programs: Moderators of improvements in maternal behavior.家访项目的荟萃分析:孕产妇行为改善的调节因素
Infant Ment Health J. 2010 Sep;31(5):499-520. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20269.
2
The Contribution of Early Communication Quality to Low-Income Children's Language Success.早期沟通质量对低收入家庭儿童语言发展成功的贡献。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1071-83. doi: 10.1177/0956797615581493. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
3
Understanding the Mechanisms Through Which an Influential Early Childhood Program Boosted Adult Outcomes.了解一个有影响力的幼儿项目提升成人发展成果的机制。
Am Econ Rev. 2013 Oct;103(6):2052-2086. doi: 10.1257/aer.103.6.2052.
4
Formal and informal home learning activities in relation to children's early numeracy and literacy skills: the development of a home numeracy model.与儿童早期数学和读写技能相关的正式和非正式家庭学习活动:家庭数学模型的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:63-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.006. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Components associated with home visiting program outcomes: a meta-analysis.与家庭访视项目成果相关的因素:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132 Suppl 2(0 2):S100-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1021H.
6
Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps.解读来自低收入家庭和语言少数群体家庭的儿童的早期语言轨迹:弥合成就差距的意义。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Jan;49(1):4-14. doi: 10.1037/a0027238. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
7
Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: associations with children's vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten.家庭学习环境在最初 5 年的发展轨迹:与学前儿童词汇和读写能力的关系。
Child Dev. 2011 Jul-Aug;82(4):1058-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01614.x. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
8
Long-term impact of prevention programs to promote effective parenting: lasting effects but uncertain processes.预防项目对促进有效育儿的长期影响:持久效果但不确定过程。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:299-329. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131619.
9
Long-term outcome of a randomized controlled universal prevention trial through a positive parenting program: is it worth the effort?一项通过积极育儿计划进行的随机对照普遍性预防试验的长期结果:是否值得努力?
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2010 May 16;4:14. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-4-14.
10
Do neighborhood and home contexts help explain why low-income children miss opportunities to participate in activities outside of school?邻里和家庭环境有助于解释为什么低收入儿童会错过校外活动的机会吗?
Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1545-62. doi: 10.1037/a0017359.