University of Valencia, Spain.
Jaume I University, Spain.
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Aug;29(6):597-613. doi: 10.1177/0963662520935078. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Recent research highlights the implications of group dynamics in the acceptance and promotion of misconceptions, particularly in relation to the identity-protective attitudes that boost polarisation over scientific information. In this study, we successfully test a mediational model between right-wing authoritarianism and pseudoscientific beliefs. First, we carry out a comprehensive literature review on the socio-political background of pseudoscientific beliefs. Second, we conduct two studies ( = 1189 and = 1097) to confirm our working hypotheses: H1 - intercorrelation between pseudoscientific beliefs, authoritarianism and three axioms (reward for application, religiosity and fate control); H2 - authoritarianism and social axioms fully explain rightists' proneness to pseudoscience; and H3 - the association between pseudoscience and authoritarianism is partially mediated by social axioms. Finally, we discuss our results in relation to their external validity regarding paranormal and conspiracy beliefs, as well as to their implications for group polarisation and science communication.
最近的研究强调了群体动态在接受和推广误解方面的影响,特别是在与增强对科学信息的两极分化的保护身份态度有关的方面。在这项研究中,我们成功地测试了右翼威权主义和伪科学信仰之间的中介模型。首先,我们对伪科学信仰的社会政治背景进行了全面的文献综述。其次,我们进行了两项研究(n1=1189 和 n2=1097)来验证我们的工作假设:H1-伪科学信仰、威权主义和三个公理(应用奖励、宗教信仰和命运控制)之间的相关性;H2-威权主义和社会公理完全解释了右翼人士对伪科学的倾向;H3-伪科学和威权主义之间的关联部分由社会公理介导。最后,我们根据超自然和阴谋信念的外部有效性以及它们对群体两极分化和科学传播的影响来讨论我们的结果。