Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Servicio Andaluz de Salud, Spain.
Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Aug;14(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
To compare the short-term effects of a neurodynamic sliding technique versus control condition on hamstring flexibility in healthy, asymptomatic male soccer players.
Twenty-eight young male soccer players from Palencia, Spain (mean age 20.7 yrs ± 1.0, range 19-22) with decreased hamstring muscle flexibility.
Subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: neurodynamic sliding intervention or no intervention control. Each subject's dominant leg was measured for straight leg raise (SLR) range of motion (ROM) pre- and post-intervention. Subjects received interventions as per group allocation over a 1 week period. Data were analyzed with a 2 (intervention: neurodynamic and control) × 2 (time: pre and post) factorial ANOVA with repeated measures and appropriate post-hoc analyses.
A significant interaction was observed between intervention and time for hamstring extensibility, F(1,26) = 159.187, p < .0005. There was no difference between the groups at the start, p = .743; however, at the end of the study, the groups were significantly different with more range of motion in the group that received neurodynamic interventions, p = .001. The group that received neurodynamic interventions improved significantly over time (p < .001), whereas the control group did not (p = .684).
Findings suggest that a neurodynamic sliding technique can increase hamstring flexibility in healthy, male soccer players.
比较神经动态滑动技术与对照条件对健康、无症状男性足球运动员腘绳肌灵活性的短期影响。
来自西班牙帕伦西亚的 28 名年轻男性足球运动员（平均年龄 20.7 岁±1.0 岁，范围 19-22 岁），腘绳肌柔韧性下降。
受试者随机分为两组：神经动态滑动干预组或无干预对照组。每组受试者的优势腿在干预前后均测量直腿抬高（SLR）的活动度（ROM）。受试者按照分组接受干预，持续 1 周。使用 2（干预：神经动态和对照）×2（时间：干预前和干预后）重复测量方差分析和适当的事后分析对数据进行分析。
干预和时间对腘绳肌伸展性的交互作用显著，F（1,26）=159.187，p<0.0005。在开始时，两组之间没有差异，p=0.743；然而，在研究结束时，接受神经动态干预的组之间存在显著差异，运动范围更大，p=0.001。接受神经动态干预的组随时间显著改善（p<0.001），而对照组则没有（p=0.684）。
研究结果表明，神经动态滑动技术可以增加健康男性足球运动员的腘绳肌柔韧性。
