Rural Clinical School, University of Queensland, Locked bag 9009, Toowoomba DC., QLD, 4350 Australia.
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2142-2154. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
This review assessed whether health literacy differences exist between rural and urban populations and whether rurality is a determinant.
Eight online databases were searched using the keywords "health literacy", "rural" and "urban", and related terms. Peer-reviewed original research comparing health literacy levels between rural and urban populations were evaluated for strength of evidence. A narrative synthesis summarised the results of included studies.
Nineteen articles met inclusion criteria and were of sufficient methodological quality for data extraction. The majority of studies found that urban populations had higher health literacy than rural populations. Differences were more likely to be found in developing than developed countries. Studies that performed covariate analysis indicated that rurality may not be a significant determinant of health literacy.
Evidence suggests that rurality alone does not explain rural-urban health literacy differences and that sociodemographic factors play important roles.
These findings could be used to help inform the development of evidence-based interventions specifically for rural populations, at both health policy and clinical levels; for example, by tackling healthcare access challenges. The findings also provide a lens through which to consider efforts to reduce rural-urban health outcome disparities.
本综述评估了健康素养是否存在于农村和城市人群之间,以及农村地区是否是一个决定因素。
使用“健康素养”、“农村”和“城市”以及相关术语,在八个在线数据库中搜索了同行评审的原始研究,比较了农村和城市人群的健康素养水平。对纳入研究的结果进行了叙述性综合。
有 19 篇文章符合纳入标准,并且具有足够的方法学质量来进行数据提取。大多数研究发现,城市人口的健康素养高于农村人口。在发展中国家比发达国家更有可能发现差异。进行协变量分析的研究表明,农村地区可能不是健康素养的重要决定因素。
有证据表明,农村地区本身并不能解释城乡健康素养差异,社会人口因素起着重要作用。
这些发现可用于帮助制定针对农村人口的循证干预措施,无论是在卫生政策还是临床层面;例如,通过解决医疗保健获取方面的挑战。这些发现还为缩小城乡健康结果差距的努力提供了一个视角。