• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚最佳他汀治疗方案的处方:一项关于英国初级医疗中趋势和差异的回顾性队列研究

Prescription of suboptimal statin treatment regimens: a retrospective cohort study of trends and variation in English primary care.

作者信息

Curtis Helen J, Walker Alex J, MacKenna Brian, Croker Richard, Goldacre Ben

机构信息

The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul 30;70(697):e525-e533. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710873. Print 2020 Aug.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp20X710873
PMID:32601055
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7357867/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2014 English national guidance recommends 'high-intensity' statins, reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by ≥40%.

AIM

To describe trends and variation in low-/medium-intensity statin prescribing and assess the feasibility of rapid prescribing behaviour change.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective cohort study using OpenPrescribing data from all 8142 standard NHS general practices in England from August 2010 to March 2019.

METHOD

Statins were categorised as high- or low-/medium-intensity using two different thresholds, and the proportion prescribed below these thresholds was calculated. The authors plotted trends and geographical variation, carried out mixed-effects logistic regression to identify practice characteristics associated with breaching of guidance, and used indicator saturation to identify sudden prescribing changes.

RESULTS

The proportion of statins prescribed below the recommended 40% LDL-lowering threshold has decreased gradually from 80% in 2011/2012 to 45% in 2019; the proportion below a pragmatic 37% threshold decreased from 30% to 18% in 2019. Guidance from 2014 had minimal impact on trends. Wide variation was found between practices (interdecile ranges 20% to 85% and 10% to 30% respectively in 2018). Regression identified no strong associations with breaching of guidance. Indicator saturation identified several practices exhibiting sudden changes towards greater guideline compliance.

CONCLUSION

Breaches of guidance on choice of statin remain common, with substantial variation between practices. Some have implemented rapid change, indicating the feasibility of rapid prescribing behaviour change. This article discusses the potential for a national strategic approach, using data and evidence to optimise care, including targeted education alongside audit and feedback to outliers through services such as OpenPrescribing.

摘要

背景

自2014年起,英国国家指南推荐使用“高强度”他汀类药物,可使低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇降低≥40%。

目的

描述低/中强度他汀类药物处方的趋势和差异,并评估快速改变处方行为的可行性。

设计与研究地点

一项回顾性队列研究,使用了2010年8月至2019年3月期间英格兰8142家标准国民保健服务(NHS)全科诊所的OpenPrescribing数据。

方法

使用两种不同阈值将他汀类药物分为高强度或低/中强度,并计算低于这些阈值的处方比例。作者绘制了趋势图和地理差异图,进行混合效应逻辑回归以确定与违反指南相关的诊所特征,并使用指标饱和度来识别处方的突然变化。

结果

低于推荐的降低LDL 40%阈值开具的他汀类药物比例已从2011/2012年的80%逐渐降至2019年的45%;低于实用的37%阈值的比例在2019年从30%降至18%。2014年的指南对趋势影响极小。各诊所之间存在很大差异(2018年十分位数间距分别为20%至85%和10%至30%)。回归分析未发现与违反指南有强烈关联。指标饱和度确定了几家诊所表现出突然向更高指南依从性的变化。

结论

他汀类药物选择方面违反指南的情况仍然普遍,各诊所之间存在很大差异。一些诊所已实现快速改变,表明快速改变处方行为是可行的。本文讨论了采用国家战略方法的潜力,利用数据和证据优化护理,包括有针对性的教育以及通过OpenPrescribing等服务对异常情况进行审核和反馈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ad/7384828/d97a719ac8ee/bjgpaug-2020-70-697-e525-oa-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ad/7384828/d97a719ac8ee/bjgpaug-2020-70-697-e525-oa-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ad/7384828/d97a719ac8ee/bjgpaug-2020-70-697-e525-oa-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Prescription of suboptimal statin treatment regimens: a retrospective cohort study of trends and variation in English primary care.亚最佳他汀治疗方案的处方:一项关于英国初级医疗中趋势和差异的回顾性队列研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul 30;70(697):e525-e533. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710873. Print 2020 Aug.
2
Trends and variation in prescribing of low-priority treatments identified by NHS England: a cross-sectional study and interactive data tool in English primary care.英格兰国民保健制度确定的低优先级治疗方案的开具趋势和变化:英国初级医疗保健中的一项横断面研究和交互式数据工具。
J R Soc Med. 2018 Jun;111(6):203-213. doi: 10.1177/0141076818769408. Epub 2018 May 22.
3
Evaluation of Statin Prescribing for Secondary Prevention in Primary Care Following New Guideline Recommendations.新指南建议下基层医疗中他汀类药物二级预防处方的评估
Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Jan;50(1):17-21. doi: 10.1177/1060028015608199. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Variations in statin prescribing for primary cardiovascular disease prevention: cross-sectional analysis.用于原发性心血管疾病预防的他汀类药物处方差异:横断面分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 20;14:414. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-414.
5
Opioid prescribing trends and geographical variation in England, 1998-2018: a retrospective database study.1998 - 2018年英格兰阿片类药物处方趋势及地理差异:一项回顾性数据库研究
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;6(2):140-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30471-1. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
6
Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care.甲氨蝶呤不安全处方的趋势和变化:英国 NHS 初级保健中的队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 25;70(696):e481-e488. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710993. Print 2020 Jul.
7
Price versus clinical guidelines in primary care statin prescribing: a retrospective cohort study and cost simulation model.在初级保健他汀类药物处方中,价格与临床指南:回顾性队列研究和成本模拟模型。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Mar;115(3):100-111. doi: 10.1177/01410768211051713. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
8
Statin prescription rates and their facility-level variation in patients with peripheral artery disease and ischemic cerebrovascular disease: Insights from the Department of Veterans Affairs.他汀类药物处方率及其在周围动脉疾病和缺血性脑血管病患者中的医疗机构间差异:来自退伍军人事务部的见解。
Vasc Med. 2018 Jun;23(3):232-240. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18758914. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.低密度脂蛋白胆固醇≥190mg/dL患者降脂治疗使用情况的差异:来自国家心血管数据注册库 - 实践创新与临床卓越注册库的见解
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 May;11(5):e004652. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004652.
10
Impact of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association cholesterol guidelines on the prescription of high-intensity statins in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome or stroke.2013年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会胆固醇指南对因急性冠状动脉综合征或中风住院患者高强度他汀类药物处方的影响。
Am Heart J. 2016 Nov;181:130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.024. Epub 2016 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The incidence of anti-HMGCR immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: an Australian and UK retrospective multi-site cohort study.抗3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶免疫介导性坏死性肌病的发病率:一项澳大利亚和英国的回顾性多中心队列研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2025 Sep 1;64(9):4995-5003. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaf238.
2
Socioeconomic status and prescribing of ADHD medications: a study of ICB-level data in England.社会经济地位与注意力缺陷多动障碍药物的处方:对英格兰综合医疗委员会(ICB)层面数据的一项研究
BMJ Ment Health. 2025 Mar 11;28(1):e301384. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301384.
3
Statin Utilization for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Developing First ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Malaysian Retrospective Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation in responsiveness to warranted behaviour change among NHS clinicians: novel implementation of change detection methods in longitudinal prescribing data.NHS 临床医生对合理行为改变的反应存在差异:纵向处方数据中变化检测方法的新应用。
BMJ. 2019 Oct 2;367:l5205. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5205.
2
Association of Region and Hospital and Patient Characteristics With Use of High-Intensity Statins After Myocardial Infarction Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群心肌梗死后高强度他汀类药物使用与地区和医院及患者特征的相关性分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;4(9):865-872. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2481.
3
Association of a Combined Measure of Adherence and Treatment Intensity With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerosis or Other Cardiovascular Risk Factors Treated With Statins and/or Ezetimibe.
他汀类药物在首次发生ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者心血管疾病一级预防中的应用:一项马来西亚回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 2;8(3):e70206. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70206. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
A retrospective observational study of certain interactions with simvastatin 40 mg in an acute hospital in England.在英国一家急症医院对40毫克辛伐他汀的某些相互作用进行的回顾性观察研究。
Br J Cardiol. 2024 May 14;31(2):020. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.020. eCollection 2024.
5
Identifying Patterns of Clinical Interest in Clinicians' Treatment Preferences: Hypothesis-free Data Science Approach to Prioritizing Prescribing Outliers for Clinical Review.识别临床医生治疗偏好中具有临床意义的模式:采用无假设数据科学方法对处方异常值进行优先级排序以进行临床审查。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Dec 20;10(12):e41200. doi: 10.2196/41200.
6
Effects of general and central adiposity on circulating lipoprotein, lipid, and metabolite levels in UK Biobank: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study.英国生物银行中总体和中心性肥胖对循环脂蛋白、脂质和代谢物水平的影响:一项多变量孟德尔随机化研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022 Jul 6;21:100457. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100457. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Longitudinal evaluation of treatment patterns, risk factors and outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease treated with lipid-lowering therapy in the UK.在英国,接受降脂治疗的心血管疾病患者的治疗模式、风险因素和结局的纵向评估。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 29;12(4):e055015. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055015.
8
Variation in statin prescription among veterans with HIV and known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.HIV 感染者和已知动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者中他汀类药物处方的差异。
Am Heart J. 2022 Jul;249:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
9
Determining propensity for sub-optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins and future risk of cardiovascular disease.评估他汀类药物治疗后 LDL 胆固醇水平不佳的倾向与未来心血管疾病风险。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260839. eCollection 2021.
10
How to Use Statins in Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Diseases: from the Beneficial Early Initiation to the Potentially Unfavorable Discontinuation.如何在动脉粥样硬化疾病的二级预防中使用他汀类药物:从早期有益的起始用药到潜在不利的停药
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Apr;37(2):353-362. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07233-8. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
联合用药依从性和治疗强度指标与他汀类药物和/或依折麦布治疗的动脉粥样硬化或其他心血管危险因素患者心血管结局的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e185554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5554.
4
Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of antibiotics in England 1998-2017.1998-2017 年英格兰抗生素处方的时间趋势和地域差异。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):242-250. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky377.
5
Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in 18 countries outside Western Europe: The International ChoLesterol management Practice Study (ICLPS).18 个西欧以外国家的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标达标情况:国际胆固醇管理实践研究(ICLPS)。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018 Jul;25(10):1087-1094. doi: 10.1177/2047487318777079. Epub 2018 May 17.
6
Time trends and geographical variation in prescribing of drugs for diabetes in England from 1998 to 2017.1998 年至 2017 年英格兰糖尿病药物处方的时间趋势和地域差异。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2159-2168. doi: 10.1111/dom.13346. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
7
The prevalence, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and treatment of patients at very high risk of cardiovascular events in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study.英国极高心血管事件风险患者的患病率、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平及治疗情况:一项横断面研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2018 Aug;34(8):1441-1447. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1463211. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
8
OpenPrescribing: normalised data and software tool to research trends in English NHS primary care prescribing 1998-2016.开放处方:用于研究1998 - 2016年英国国民医疗服务体系初级医疗处方趋势的标准化数据和软件工具。
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 23;8(2):e019921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019921.
9
Meta-analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Controlled Trials on the Prevalence of Statin Intolerance.关于他汀类药物不耐受发生率的安慰剂对照随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 1;120(5):774-781. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.046. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
10
Retrospective examination of lipid-lowering treatment patterns in a real-world high-risk cohort in the UK in 2014: comparison with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2014 lipid modification guidelines.2014年英国一个真实世界高风险队列中降脂治疗模式的回顾性研究:与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)2014年血脂修饰指南的比较。
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013255. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013255.