• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估本科医学生的姑息治疗教育:巴西葡萄牙语版的姑息治疗自我效能感和死亡恐惧量表的翻译和验证。

Assessing palliative care education in undergraduate medical students: translation and validation of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care and Thanatophobia Scales for Brazilian Portuguese.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):e034567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034567.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034567
PMID:32601112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7328756/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the global population ages, palliative care is ever more essential to provide care for patients with incurable chronic conditions. However, in many countries, doctors are not prepared to care for dying patients. Palliative care education should be an urgent concern for all medical schools all around the world, including Latin America and Brazil. Advances in palliative care education require robust assessment tools for constant evaluation and improvement of educational programmes. Bandura's social cognitive theory proposes that active learning processes are mediated by self-efficacy and associated outcome expectancies, both crucial elements of developing new behaviour. The Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care (SEPC) and Thanatophobia Scales were developed using Bandura's theory to assess the outcomes of palliative care training.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to translate and validate these scales for Brazilian Portuguese to generate data on how well doctors are being prepared to meet the needs of their patients.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

One Brazilian medical school.

PARTICIPANTS

Third-year medical students.

METHODS

The authors translated the scales following the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's recommendations and examined their psychometric properties using data collected from a sample of 111 students in a Brazilian medical school in 2017.

RESULTS

The Brazilian versions of SEPC and Thanatophobia Scales showed good psychometric properties, including confirmatory factor analysis, replicating the original factors (factor range: 0.51-0.90), and acceptable values of reliability (Cronbach's alpha: 0.82-0.97 and composite reliability: 0.82-0.96). Additionally, the Brazilian versions of the scales showed concurrent validity, demonstrated through a significant negative correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

The Brazilian version of the scales may be used to assess the impact of current undergraduate training and identify areas for improvement within palliative care educational programmes. The data generated allow Brazilian researchers to join international conversations on this topic and educators to develop tailored pedagogical approaches.

摘要

背景

随着全球人口老龄化,姑息治疗对于为患有不可治愈的慢性疾病的患者提供护理变得至关重要。然而,在许多国家,医生没有准备好照顾临终患者。姑息治疗教育应该成为全世界所有医学院的当务之急,包括拉丁美洲和巴西。姑息治疗教育的进步需要强大的评估工具,以不断评估和改进教育计划。班杜拉的社会认知理论提出,主动学习过程受到自我效能感和相关结果预期的影响,这是发展新行为的两个关键因素。姑息护理自我效能感(SEPC)和死亡恐惧量表是根据班杜拉的理论开发的,用于评估姑息治疗培训的结果。

目的

我们旨在将这些量表翻译成巴西葡萄牙语并对其进行验证,以生成有关医生在满足患者需求方面准备情况的数据。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

巴西的一所医学院。

参与者

三年级医学生。

方法

作者按照欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织的建议对量表进行了翻译,并使用 2017 年在巴西一所医学院的 111 名学生的样本数据检验了其心理测量特性。

结果

SEPC 和死亡恐惧量表的巴西版本表现出良好的心理测量特性,包括验证性因子分析,复制了原始因素(因素范围:0.51-0.90),以及可接受的可靠性值(Cronbach 的α:0.82-0.97 和综合可靠性:0.82-0.96)。此外,量表的巴西版本具有同时效度,通过显著的负相关得到证明。

结论

量表的巴西版本可用于评估当前本科培训的影响,并确定姑息治疗教育计划中的改进领域。生成的数据使巴西研究人员能够加入关于这一主题的国际对话,并使教育工作者能够制定针对性的教学方法。

相似文献

1
Assessing palliative care education in undergraduate medical students: translation and validation of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care and Thanatophobia Scales for Brazilian Portuguese.评估本科医学生的姑息治疗教育:巴西葡萄牙语版的姑息治疗自我效能感和死亡恐惧量表的翻译和验证。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):e034567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034567.
2
Assessing undergraduate palliative care education: validity and reliability of two scales examining perceived efficacy and outcome expectancies in palliative care.评估本科姑息治疗教育:两种量表在检验姑息治疗中感知疗效和结果预期方面的有效性和可靠性。
Med Educ. 2004 Oct;38(10):1103-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01960.x.
3
Preparing for palliative medicine; evaluation of an education programme for fourth year medical undergraduates.筹备姑息治疗学;对医学本科四年级学生的一项教育计划的评估
Palliat Med. 2008 Sep;22(6):687-92. doi: 10.1177/0269216308090070.
4
Examining the effect of non-specialised clinical rotations upon medical students' Thanatophobia and Self-efficacy in Palliative Care: a prospective observational study in two medical schools.考察非专科临床轮转对医学生临终恐惧及姑息治疗自我效能的影响:在两所医学院校开展的一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e041144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041144.
5
Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: psychometric properties and factor analysis.巴西版杰斐逊同理心量表:心理测量学特性和因子分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Aug 9;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-73.
6
The developing and evaluation of an electronic tool to assess the effect of undergraduate training in palliative care: the electronic international medical education in palliative care (IMEP-e) assessment tool.开发和评估一种电子工具,以评估本科阶段姑息治疗培训的效果:电子国际姑息治疗医学教育(IMEP-e)评估工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Sep 2;18(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0460-3.
7
Validation of the German revised version of the program in palliative care education and practice questionnaire (PCEP-GR).验证德国修订版的缓和医疗教育与实践问卷(PCEP-GR)。
BMC Palliat Care. 2017 Dec 28;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0263-3.
8
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the mindful self-care scale among Brazilian palliative care providers.巴西姑息治疗提供者的正念自我关怀量表的翻译、文化调适及效度验证
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Dec;20(6):839-845. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521001802.
9
Does interdisciplinary and multiprofessional undergraduate education increase students' self-confidence and knowledge toward palliative care? Evaluation of an undergraduate curriculum design for palliative care at a German academic hospital.跨学科和多专业的本科教育是否能增强学生对姑息治疗的自信心和知识?对德国一家学术医院姑息治疗本科课程设计的评估。
J Palliat Med. 2015 Jun;18(6):513-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2014.0337. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
10
Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the role-modeling cost-conscious behaviors scale.翻译、跨文化调适和验证榜样成本意识行为量表。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 16;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1587-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning how to talk about approaching death: results from a pre-test post-test trial on the effectiveness of a blended-learning approach.学习如何谈论濒死之事:一项关于混合式学习方法有效性的前后测试验结果
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07178-8.
2
Challenges in Palliative Care in Latin America: A Narrative Review.拉丁美洲姑息治疗面临的挑战:一项叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2024 May 20;16(5):e60698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60698. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Self-efficacy in Palliative Care scale (SEPC) for use in Swedish healthcare settings.在瑞典医疗保健环境中使用的舒缓护理自我效能感量表(SEPC)的翻译、改编和验证。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Apr 11;21(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00940-5.
4
Examining the effect of non-specialised clinical rotations upon medical students' Thanatophobia and Self-efficacy in Palliative Care: a prospective observational study in two medical schools.考察非专科临床轮转对医学生临终恐惧及姑息治疗自我效能的影响:在两所医学院校开展的一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 18;10(11):e041144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041144.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-life care in the Dutch medical curricula.荷兰医学课程中的临终关怀。
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Oct;7(5):325-331. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0447-4.
2
Can elearning be used to teach palliative care? - medical students' acceptance, knowledge, and self-estimation of competence in palliative care after elearning.电子学习能否用于姑息治疗教学?- 医学生对电子学习后姑息治疗的接受程度、知识和自我估计能力。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 27;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1186-2.
3
Self-efficacy beliefs of medical students: a critical review.医学生的自我效能信念:批判性评价。
Perspect Med Educ. 2018 Apr;7(2):76-82. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0411-3.
4
Confidence in palliative care issues by medical students and internal medicine residents.医学生和内科住院医师对姑息治疗问题的信心。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):e1. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001341. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
5
Palliative care education in Latin America: A systematic review of training programs for healthcare professionals.拉丁美洲的姑息治疗教育:医疗保健专业人员培训计划的系统评价。
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Feb;16(1):107-117. doi: 10.1017/S147895151700061X. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
6
Using simulation as a learning experience in clinical teams to learn about palliative and end-of-life care: A literature review.利用模拟作为临床团队的学习体验来学习姑息治疗和临终关怀:文献综述。
Death Stud. 2018 Mar;42(3):172-183. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2017.1334006. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
7
Learning to care: medical students' reported value and evaluation of palliative care teaching involving meeting patients and reflective writing.学会关怀:医学生对涉及接触患者及反思性写作的姑息治疗教学的报告价值与评价
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 25;16(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0827-6.
8
Palliative Care Bedside Teaching: A Qualitative Analysis of Medical Students' Reflective Writings after Clinical Practices.姑息治疗床边教学:对医学生临床实习后反思性写作的定性分析
J Palliat Med. 2017 Feb;20(2):147-154. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0192. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Palliative Care in Undergraduate Medical Education-How Far Have We Come?本科医学教育中的姑息治疗——我们已经走了多远?
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;34(8):762-773. doi: 10.1177/1049909116659737. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
Progress and divergence in palliative care education for medical students: A comparative survey of UK course structure, content, delivery, contact with patients and assessment of learning.医学生姑息治疗教育的进展与差异:英国课程结构、内容、授课方式、与患者接触及学习评估的比较调查
Palliat Med. 2016 Oct;30(9):834-42. doi: 10.1177/0269216315627125. Epub 2016 Feb 4.