• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习如何谈论濒死之事:一项关于混合式学习方法有效性的前后测试验结果

Learning how to talk about approaching death: results from a pre-test post-test trial on the effectiveness of a blended-learning approach.

作者信息

Schmitz Felix Michael, Buzzi Ann-Lea, Felber Sibylle Jeanine, Zambrano Sofia Carolina, Hitzblech Tanja, Schnabel Kai Philipp, Eychmüller Steffen, Guttormsen Sissel

机构信息

Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, 3010, Switzerland.

Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, Bern, 3012, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07178-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-07178-8
PMID:40597946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12220658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caring for dying individuals is a key aspect of many clinical and medical practices. However, training and reflection opportunities on conversations between healthcare professionals, dying patients, and caregivers are limited. To address this gap, we developed a blended-learning approach focusing on effective communication about approaching death, termed Talking About Dying (TAD). This study aimed to evaluate the impact of this approach on pre- and postgraduate medical learners' knowledge, anxiety, self-efficacy, and skills related to TAD.

METHODS

A pre-test post-test trial with n = 12 medical students and n = 11 nursing professionals was applied. Data were collected at three time points: (1) at baseline (pre-intervention) (2), after a 45-minute online TAD module (post-intervention I), and (3) after a 90-minute onsite workshop with experts (post-intervention II). Knowledge was tested with self-developed multiple-choice questions, while anxiety when discussing death and self-efficacy were assessed using published questionnaires, i.e., the 7-item Thanatophobia Scale and a 1-item scale according to Bandura. Participants demonstrated their TAD-related skills in encounters with simulated patients, which were scored by trained assessors using a self-developed scale. The TAD online module (intervention I) included text and video demonstrations with critical hints, while the onsite workshop (intervention II) involved group reflection, discussion, and role-play to deepen understanding.

RESULTS

Participants demonstrated increased knowledge, reduced thanatophobia (amongst medical students but not nursing professionals), and enhanced self-efficacy and skills following both interventions, with these effects being both statistically and practically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining an online module with an in-person workshop can meaningfully enhance learning outcomes across cognitive, affective, and behavioural dimensions related to TAD conversations for both medical students and professional nurses, though changes in the affective dimensions were observed only in students. We recommend integrating this method into medical and nursing education.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

照顾临终患者是许多临床和医疗实践的关键环节。然而,医疗保健专业人员、临终患者及其护理人员之间对话的培训和反思机会有限。为了弥补这一差距,我们开发了一种混合式学习方法,重点是就接近死亡的话题进行有效沟通,称为“谈论死亡”(TAD)。本研究旨在评估该方法对医学研究生和本科生在与TAD相关的知识、焦虑、自我效能感和技能方面的影响。

方法

对12名医学生和11名护理专业人员进行了一项前后测试验。在三个时间点收集数据:(1)基线(干预前);(2)在45分钟的TAD在线模块学习后(干预后I);(3)在与专家进行90分钟的现场研讨会后(干预后II)。通过自行编制的多项选择题测试知识,使用已发表的问卷评估讨论死亡时的焦虑和自我效能感,即7项死亡恐惧量表和根据班杜拉编制的1项量表。参与者在与模拟患者的接触中展示他们与TAD相关的技能,由经过培训的评估人员使用自行编制的量表进行评分。TAD在线模块(干预I)包括带有关键提示的文本和视频演示,而现场研讨会(干预II)包括小组反思、讨论和角色扮演,以加深理解。

结果

参与者在两次干预后均表现出知识增加、死亡恐惧减少(医学生中是这样,但护理专业人员中并非如此)、自我效能感和技能增强,这些效果在统计学和实际意义上均显著。

结论

将在线模块与现场研讨会相结合,可以显著提高医学生和专业护士在与TAD对话相关的认知、情感和行为维度上的学习成果,不过情感维度的变化仅在学生中观察到。我们建议将这种方法纳入医学和护理教育。

临床试验编号

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/f3f6aedca1ee/12909_2025_7178_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/a45588d1d402/12909_2025_7178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/287d11f1b2da/12909_2025_7178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/727dd59af54b/12909_2025_7178_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/d595f8f3eaa1/12909_2025_7178_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/41b7fe92faef/12909_2025_7178_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/f3f6aedca1ee/12909_2025_7178_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/a45588d1d402/12909_2025_7178_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/287d11f1b2da/12909_2025_7178_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/727dd59af54b/12909_2025_7178_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/d595f8f3eaa1/12909_2025_7178_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/41b7fe92faef/12909_2025_7178_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ea7/12220658/f3f6aedca1ee/12909_2025_7178_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning how to talk about approaching death: results from a pre-test post-test trial on the effectiveness of a blended-learning approach.学习如何谈论濒死之事:一项关于混合式学习方法有效性的前后测试验结果
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):979. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07178-8.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
6
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
7
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
8
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
9
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
10
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning how to explore spiritual aspects in encounters with patients with chronic pain: a pre-test post-test trial on the effectiveness of a web-based learning intervention.学习如何在与慢性疼痛患者的接触中探索精神层面:一项关于基于网络的学习干预有效性的预测试后试验。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 25;24(1):1212. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06142-2.
2
How to talk about dying? The development of an evidence-based model for communication with patients in their last days of life and their family caregivers.如何谈论死亡?为在患者生命的最后日子里与他们及其家庭护理人员进行沟通而开发的循证模型。
PEC Innov. 2024 Jun 18;5:100309. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100309. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
3
A systematic scoping review of communication skills training in medical schools between 2000 and 2020.
2000 年至 2020 年医学院校沟通技巧培训的系统范围综述。
Med Teach. 2022 Sep;44(9):997-1006. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2054693. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
How to talk with the family of a dying patient: anger to understanding, rage to compassion, loss to acceptance.如何与临终患者的家属沟通:从愤怒到理解,从愤怒到同情,从失落到接受。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Dec;11(4):418-421. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002971. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
5
Actual and Missed Opportunities for End-of-Life Care Discussions With Oncology Patients: A Qualitative Study.终末期癌症患者的生存机会和错失的生存机会:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113193. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13193.
6
Nurses' involvement in end-of-life discussions with incurable cancer patients and family caregivers: An integrative review.护士参与绝症癌症患者和家属临终关怀讨论:综合评价。
Palliat Support Care. 2022 Aug;20(4):570-581. doi: 10.1017/S1478951521000596.
7
Clinicians' accounts of communication with patients in end-of-life care contexts: A systematic review.临床医生在临终关怀背景下与患者沟通的描述:系统评价。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):1913-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.06.033. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
Assessing palliative care education in undergraduate medical students: translation and validation of the Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care and Thanatophobia Scales for Brazilian Portuguese.评估本科医学生的姑息治疗教育:巴西葡萄牙语版的姑息治疗自我效能感和死亡恐惧量表的翻译和验证。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 29;10(6):e034567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034567.
9
Learning how to break bad news from worked examples: Does the presentation format matter when hints are embedded? Results from randomised and blinded field trials.从实例中学习如何传达坏消息:当嵌入提示时,呈现格式是否重要?随机和盲法现场试验的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Sep;103(9):1850-1855. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
10
Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom.压力下的学习与记忆:对课堂的启示
NPJ Sci Learn. 2016 Jun 29;1:16011. doi: 10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.11. eCollection 2016.