Lagreze H L, Levine R L, Sunderland J S, Nickles R J
Department of Neurology, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin 53705.
Clin Nucl Med. 1988 Mar;13(3):197-201. doi: 10.1097/00003072-198803000-00016.
In 20 patients with unilateral cerebrovascular disease, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured by F-18-fluoromethane inhalation and positron emission tomography (PET). The purpose was to study various strategies of rCBF data analysis that are currently used in SPECT and PET. Methods of quantitative data analysis standardize rCBF values relative to an intraindividual reference, and thus create ratios as estimators of rCBF in the ischemic regions-of-interest (ROI). These ratios were compared as well as the absolute rCBF values in the ischemic ROI graphically and by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r). The results demonstrated that previously reported methods of data analysis failed to represent rCBF in the ischemic ROI; r values were 0.467, -0.406, -0.453, and 0.329, respectively (N.S.). This failure was due to a more widespread reduction of rCBF even in patients with minimal ischemic deficits. In conclusion, previously reported strategies of rCBF analysis based on intraindividual standardization should not be used in patients with cerebrovascular disease since they may produce misleading results.
在20例单侧脑血管疾病患者中,通过吸入F-18-氟甲烷并采用正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量局部脑血流量(rCBF)。目的是研究目前在单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)和PET中使用的各种rCBF数据分析策略。定量数据分析方法相对于个体内参考标准对rCBF值进行标准化,从而创建比率作为缺血性感兴趣区域(ROI)中rCBF的估计值。对这些比率以及缺血性ROI中的绝对rCBF值进行了图形比较,并通过斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(r)进行了比较。结果表明,先前报道的数据分析方法未能反映缺血性ROI中的rCBF;r值分别为0.467、-0.406、-0.453和0.329(无统计学意义)。这种失败是由于即使在缺血性缺损最小的患者中,rCBF也有更广泛的降低。总之,先前报道的基于个体内标准化的rCBF分析策略不应在脑血管疾病患者中使用,因为它们可能产生误导性结果。