• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据性格类型比较男性吸烟者和非吸烟者唾液中的总抗氧化剂水平。

Comparison of salivary total antioxidant levels in male smokers and non-smokers according to their personality types.

作者信息

Mortazavi Hamed, Ghasemi Azadeh, Vatankhah Mohammad Reza

机构信息

Department of Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Dental private office, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Dent Med Probl. 2020 Apr-Jun;57(2):145-148. doi: 10.17219/dmp/114440.

DOI:10.17219/dmp/114440
PMID:32602271
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoking is a major global health problem, associated with various oral diseases, such as oral cancers. Salivary antioxidants may play an important role in fighting against radicals and the oxidative components of cigarettes, which can cause DNA damage. Furthermore, psychological stress, which occurs more often in individuals with type A personality, affects plasma antioxidant levels.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the levels of salivary total antioxidant capacity (TAC) between smokers and non-smokers according to their personality types.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this descriptive cross-sectional study, saliva samples were collected from 40 male smokers (with ≥0.1 pack-years) and 40 male non-smokers. After centrifugation, the samples were assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Pearson's correlation, Welch's t-test and the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The TAC of saliva in smokers was significantly lower than in non-smokers (p = 0.019). Type A and type B smokers showed no significant decrease in TAC (p > 0.05 and p = 0.05, respectively) as compared to type A and type B non-smokers, respectively. Type A smokers reported a higher number of cigarettes smoked per day as compared to smokers with type B personality (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking cigarettes was associated with a significant decrease in salivary TAC. However, the personality type did not affect salivary TAC in the present study.

摘要

背景

吸烟是一个全球性的主要健康问题,与多种口腔疾病相关,如口腔癌。唾液中的抗氧化剂可能在对抗自由基和香烟中的氧化成分方面发挥重要作用,这些成分会导致DNA损伤。此外,心理压力在A型人格个体中更常出现,会影响血浆抗氧化剂水平。

目的

本研究的目的是根据人格类型比较吸烟者和非吸烟者唾液总抗氧化能力(TAC)水平。

材料与方法

在这项描述性横断面研究中,从40名男性吸烟者(吸烟量≥0.1包年)和40名男性非吸烟者中采集唾液样本。离心后,使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试剂盒对样本进行评估。采用Pearson相关性分析、Welch's t检验和单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析。

结果

吸烟者唾液中的TAC显著低于非吸烟者(p = 0.019)。与A型和B型非吸烟者相比,A型和B型吸烟者的TAC没有显著下降(分别为p > 0.05和p = 0.05)。与B型人格吸烟者相比,A型吸烟者报告的每日吸烟量更高(p = 0.043)。

结论

吸烟与唾液TAC显著下降有关。然而,在本研究中人格类型并未影响唾液TAC。

相似文献

1
Comparison of salivary total antioxidant levels in male smokers and non-smokers according to their personality types.根据性格类型比较男性吸烟者和非吸烟者唾液中的总抗氧化剂水平。
Dent Med Probl. 2020 Apr-Jun;57(2):145-148. doi: 10.17219/dmp/114440.
2
Evaluation of Antioxidant Capacity and Cotinine Levels of Saliva in Male Smokers and Non-smokers.男性吸烟者与非吸烟者唾液抗氧化能力及可替宁水平的评估
Addict Health. 2020 Oct;12(4):244-250. doi: 10.22122/ahj.v12i4.278.
3
Are there any relationships between personality type, salivary total antioxidant level and academic stress?人格类型、唾液总抗氧化水平与学业压力之间是否存在关系?
Dent Med Probl. 2021 Oct-Dec;58(4):447-452. doi: 10.17219/dmp/131757.
4
The effects of cigarette smoking and exercise on total salivary antioxidant activity.吸烟与运动对唾液总抗氧化活性的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2019 Jan;31(1):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
5
Comparison of salivary antioxidants in healthy smoking and non-smoking men.健康吸烟男性与非吸烟男性唾液抗氧化剂的比较。
Chang Gung Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):607-11.
6
Effects of cigarette smoking on the antioxidant defence in young healthy male volunteers.吸烟对年轻健康男性志愿者抗氧化防御功能的影响。
Int J Clin Pract. 2005 Jan;59(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00340.x.
7
Comparison of Cotinine Salivary Levels in Hookah Smokers, Passive Smokers, and Non-Smokers.水烟吸食者、被动吸烟者和非吸烟者唾液中可替宁水平的比较。
Addict Health. 2015 Summer-Autumn;7(3-4):184-91.
8
Evaluation of Salivary Antioxidants and Oxidative Stress Markers in Male Smokers.男性吸烟者唾液抗氧化剂和氧化应激标志物的评估
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2019;22(7):496-501. doi: 10.2174/1386207322666190806123616.
9
Does green tea consumption improve the salivary antioxidant status of smokers?绿茶摄入是否能改善吸烟者的唾液抗氧化状态?
Arch Oral Biol. 2017 Jun;78:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
10
Salivary oxidative stress biomarkers in periodontitis-free smokers: a cross sectional study.牙周炎非吸烟者唾液氧化应激生物标志物:一项横断面研究。
Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2024 Aug;73(4):209-216. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6329.24.04879-4. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Enneagram typologies and healthy personality to psychosocial stress: A network approach.九型人格类型与面对心理社会压力时的健康人格:一种网络分析方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 24;13:1051271. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051271. eCollection 2022.
2
Potential Salivary Markers for Differential Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.用于克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎鉴别诊断的潜在唾液标志物
Life (Basel). 2021 Sep 9;11(9):943. doi: 10.3390/life11090943.