From the Departments of Radiology (A.L.H., M.R., V.V.), Nuclear Medicine (A.D., M.S., R.L.), and Hepatology (L.C.), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine, Hôpital Beaujon, 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France; Université Paris-Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France (A.L.H., G.C.); INSERM U1149, Centre de Recherche de l'Inflammation (CRI), Paris, France (A.D., M.R., M.S., L.C., R.L., V.V.); Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France (M.R., L.C., R.L., V.V.); Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Paris, France (H.P., G.C.); INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1418 (CIC1418), Paris, France (H.P., G.C.); and Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France (E.G.).
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):673-684. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191606. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Background Little is known about factors that influence the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Purpose To determine the relationship between tumor radiation-absorbed dose and survival and tumor response in locally advanced inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TARE. Materials and Methods This was a secondary analysis of prospectively acquired data (between December 2011 and March 2015) from participants who received TARE in the Sorafenib versus Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (SARAH) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01482442). Tumor-absorbed dose was computed using technetium 99m (Tc) macroaggregated human albumin (MAA) SPECT/CT. Visual agreement among CT, Tc-MAA SPECT/CT, and yttrium 90 (Y) SPECT/CT or PET/CT was scored as optimal, suboptimal, or not optimal. Overall survival (OS) and tumor response at 6-month follow-up CT (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) were assessed. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier tests. A propensity score comparing participants receiving a tumor dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy (best cut-off according to the receiver operating characteristic curve and median tumor radiation-absorbed dose values in the study groups) with those receiving sorafenib was calculated. Results One hundred twenty-one participants (median age, 67 years; interquartile range [IQR]: 61-73 years; 110 men) were evaluated in the dose-survival group, and 109 (median age, 66 years; IQR: 61-71 years; 100 men) were evaluated in the dose-tumor response group. In the dose-survival group, median OS was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.7 months, 10.7 months), and median tumor radiation-absorbed dose was 112 Gy (IQR: 68-220 Gy). Participants who received at least 100 Gy ( = 67) had longer survival than those who received less than 100 Gy (median, 14.1 months [95% CI: 9.6 months, 18.6 months] vs 6.1 months [95% CI: 4.9 months, 6.8 months], respectively; < .001), and those with optimal agreement ( = 24) had the longest median OS (24.9 months; 95% CI: 9.6 months, 33.9 months). In the dose-tumor response group, tumor radiation-absorbed dose was higher in participants with disease control versus those with progressive disease (median, 121 Gy [IQR: 86-190 Gy] vs 85 Gy [IQR: 58-164 Gy]; = .02). The highest disease control rate was observed in 31 of 40 participants (78%) with a tumor radiation-absorbed dose greater than or equal to 100 Gy and optimal agreement. Conclusion Higher tumor radiation-absorbed dose computed at technetium 99m macroaggregated human albumin SPECT/CT was associated with better overall survival and disease control in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial radioembolization with yttrium 90 in the Sorafenib versus Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma trial. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Sofocleous and Kamarinos in this issue.
关于影响经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)疗效的因素知之甚少。目的:确定经 TARE 治疗局部晚期不可切除肝细胞癌患者的肿瘤吸收剂量与生存和肿瘤反应之间的关系。材料与方法:这是对 Sorafenib 与 Radioembolization 治疗晚期肝细胞癌(SARAH)试验(ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01482442)前瞻性采集数据的二次分析(2011 年 12 月至 2015 年 3 月)。使用锝 99m(Tc)聚合人白蛋白(MAA)SPECT/CT 计算肿瘤吸收剂量。通过 CT、Tc-MAA SPECT/CT 和钇 90(Y)SPECT/CT 或 PET/CT 之间的可视一致性进行评分,最佳、次优或不佳。使用 Kaplan-Meier 检验评估总生存期(OS)和 6 个月时 CT 随访的肿瘤反应(实体瘤反应评价标准,版本 1.1)。根据受试者工作特征曲线和研究组中肿瘤辐射吸收剂量的中位数,计算比较接受肿瘤剂量大于或等于 100 Gy(最佳截断值)与接受索拉非尼的参与者的倾向评分。结果:121 名参与者(中位年龄,67 岁;四分位距[IQR]:61-73 岁;110 名男性)被纳入剂量-生存组进行评估,109 名参与者(中位年龄,66 岁;IQR:61-71 岁;100 名男性)被纳入剂量-肿瘤反应组进行评估。在剂量-生存组中,中位 OS 为 9.3 个月(95%CI:6.7 个月,10.7 个月),中位肿瘤吸收剂量为 112 Gy(IQR:68-220 Gy)。接受至少 100 Gy(n = 67)的患者的生存时间长于接受低于 100 Gy 的患者(中位数,14.1 个月[95%CI:9.6 个月,18.6 个月]比 6.1 个月[95%CI:4.9 个月,6.8 个月];<.001),而具有最佳一致性(n = 24)的患者的中位 OS 最长(24.9 个月;95%CI:9.6 个月,33.9 个月)。在剂量-肿瘤反应组中,疾病控制组的肿瘤吸收剂量高于疾病进展组(中位数,121 Gy[IQR:86-190 Gy]比 85 Gy[IQR:58-164 Gy];=.02)。在肿瘤吸收剂量大于或等于 100 Gy 且具有最佳一致性的 40 名患者中,有 31 名(78%)观察到最高疾病控制率。结论:在接受钇 90 经动脉放射栓塞治疗的肝细胞癌患者中,使用锝 99m 聚合人白蛋白 SPECT/CT 计算的较高肿瘤吸收剂量与更好的总体生存和疾病控制相关。在 SARAH 试验中。©RSNA,2020 也请参见本期 Sofocleous 和 Kamarinos 的社论。