• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

紧急与早期开始腹膜透析:患者特征和结局。

Urgent vs. early-start peritoneal dialysis: patients' profile and outcomes.

机构信息

Fundação Pró-Rim, Joinville, SC, Brasil.

Universidade da Região de Joinville - Univille, Escola de Medicina, Joinville, SC, Brasil.

出版信息

J Bras Nefrol. 2021 Jan-Mar;43(1):110-114. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2020-0011.

DOI:10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2020-0011
PMID:32602882
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8061954/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been considered a safe option of therapy in end-stage renal disease patients with urgent need of dialysis. Recently, it was proposed that Urgent-Start-PD (US-PD) be defined when PD starts within 72 hours after catheter placement and "early start" PD (ES-PD) when PD starts between 3 and 14 days after. We aimed to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between patients in US-PD and ES-PD as well as 30-day complications, 6-month hospitalization, and dropout rate.

METHODS

Adult patients starting PD within 14 days after catheter insertion (October/2016 - February/2019) were included and divided into US-PD group and ES-PD group based on the their PD initiation time. Clinical and demographic data, fill volume for the first PD session, 30-day complications, 6-month hospitalization, and dropout rate were assessed.

RESULTS

In our study, 72 patients were analyzed (US-PD=40, ES-PD=32) with mean age of 53.2±15.2 years old. No differences between US-PD and ES-PD regarding demographic characteristics, 30-day complications, 6-month hospitalization, and dropout events were found. The most frequent short-term complication in patients who started PD urgently was leakage. The most common cause of dropout was transfer to HD.

CONCLUSION

Fifty five percent of our sample started PD less than 72 hours after catheter insertion. The lack of difference in the measured outcomes compared to patients that had therapy initiated after this period encourages the use of urgent PD when needed.

摘要

简介

腹膜透析(PD)已被认为是终末期肾病患者紧急透析的安全治疗选择。最近,有人提出,PD 在导管放置后 72 小时内开始时应定义为紧急开始 PD(US-PD),而 PD 在 3 至 14 天后开始时应定义为早期开始 PD(ES-PD)。我们旨在比较 US-PD 和 ES-PD 患者的人口统计学和临床特征,以及 30 天并发症、6 个月住院和退出率。

方法

纳入在导管插入后 14 天内开始 PD 的成年患者(2016 年 10 月至 2019 年 2 月),并根据 PD 开始时间将其分为 US-PD 组和 ES-PD 组。评估临床和人口统计学数据、第一次 PD 治疗的填充量、30 天并发症、6 个月住院和退出率。

结果

本研究共分析了 72 例患者(US-PD=40,ES-PD=32),平均年龄为 53.2±15.2 岁。US-PD 和 ES-PD 两组在人口统计学特征、30 天并发症、6 个月住院和退出事件方面无差异。紧急开始 PD 的患者最常见的短期并发症是渗漏。退出的最常见原因是转至 HD。

结论

我们的样本中有 55%的患者在导管插入后不到 72 小时就开始进行 PD。与在此期间后开始治疗的患者相比,在测量结果方面没有差异,这鼓励在需要时使用紧急 PD。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e9/8061954/5ab03046471e/2175-8239-jbn-2020-0011-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e9/8061954/5ab03046471e/2175-8239-jbn-2020-0011-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e9/8061954/5ab03046471e/2175-8239-jbn-2020-0011-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Urgent vs. early-start peritoneal dialysis: patients' profile and outcomes.紧急与早期开始腹膜透析:患者特征和结局。
J Bras Nefrol. 2021 Jan-Mar;43(1):110-114. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2020-0011.
2
Urgent vs. planned peritoneal dialysis initiation: complications and outcomes in the first year of therapy.紧急与计划性腹膜透析起始:治疗第一年的并发症和结局。
J Bras Nefrol. 2022 Oct-Dec;44(4):482-489. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2021-0182.
3
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease: a 10-year retrospective study.紧急启动腹膜透析治疗终末期肾病患者:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Jul 2;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1408-9.
4
Feasibility of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in Older Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Single-Center Experience.老年终末期肾病患者紧急开始腹膜透析的可行性:单中心经验
Perit Dial Int. 2018 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-130. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00002. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Urgent-start dialysis: Comparison of complications and outcomes between peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis.紧急起始透析:腹膜透析与血液透析的并发症和结局比较。
Perit Dial Int. 2021 Mar;41(2):244-252. doi: 10.1177/0896860820915021. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
6
Early and Late Patient Outcomes in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis.紧急开始腹膜透析的早期和晚期患者结局
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Jul-Aug;37(4):414-419. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00158. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
7
Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Brazilian Experience.紧急启动腹膜透析:巴西经验。
Blood Purif. 2023;52(6):556-563. doi: 10.1159/000529133. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
8
Success of Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis in a Large Canadian Renal Program.加拿大一项大型肾脏项目中紧急启动腹膜透析的成功案例
Perit Dial Int. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):171-6. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00148. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
9
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.紧急启动腹膜透析与血液透析治疗慢性肾脏病患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 27;1(1):CD012899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012899.pub2.
10
[Urgent-start PD: a viable approach].[紧急启动腹膜透析:一种可行的方法]
G Ital Nefrol. 2021 Apr 14;38(2):2021-vol2.

引用本文的文献

1
An updated systematic review of the risk factors for unplanned dialysis initiation.关于计划外开始透析的风险因素的最新系统评价。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Oct 29;17(12):sfae333. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae333. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparative analysis of complications and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion: single purse-string suture vs. double purses-string suture.腹膜透析导管插入术中并发症与技术存活率的比较分析:单荷包缝合与双荷包缝合
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2435209. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2435209. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
3
Incremental peritoneal dialysis after unplanned start initiation.

本文引用的文献

1
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus conventional-start peritoneal dialysis for people with chronic kidney disease.紧急启动腹膜透析与常规启动腹膜透析治疗慢性肾脏病患者的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 15;12(12):CD012913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012913.pub2.
2
Peritoneal Dialysis as an Urgent-Start Option for Incident Patients on Chronic Renal Replacement Therapy: World Experience and Review of Literature.腹膜透析作为慢性肾脏替代治疗急症患者的起始选择:世界经验和文献复习。
Blood Purif. 2020;49(6):652-657. doi: 10.1159/000506505. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis for patients with end stage renal disease: a 10-year retrospective study.
计划外开始后的增量腹膜透析。
Front Nephrol. 2022 Jul 25;2:932562. doi: 10.3389/fneph.2022.932562. eCollection 2022.
4
Update of dialysis initiation timing in end stage kidney disease patients: is it a resolved question? A systematic literature review.终末期肾病患者透析起始时机的更新:这是一个已经解决的问题吗?系统文献回顾。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Jun 7;24(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03184-4.
5
Unplanned-start peritoneal dialysis in Brazil: great results, little application.巴西的非计划性起始腹膜透析:效果显著,但应用较少。
J Bras Nefrol. 2023 Jan-Mar;45(1):3-4. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2023-E002en.
紧急启动腹膜透析治疗终末期肾病患者:一项 10 年回顾性研究。
BMC Nephrol. 2019 Jul 2;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12882-019-1408-9.
4
Brazilian chronic dialysis survey 2017.2017年巴西慢性透析调查
J Bras Nefrol. 2019 Apr-Jun;41(2):208-214. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2018-0178. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
5
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis and patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.紧急启动腹膜透析与患者结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019 Mar;23(5):2158-2166. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17261.
6
Urgent start peritoneal dialysis.紧急开始腹膜透析。
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018 Nov;27(6):478-486. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000451.
7
Urgent Start Peritoneal Dialysis: Defining What It Is and Why It Matters.紧急开始腹膜透析:定义其内涵及重要性
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Aug 7;13(8):1278-1279. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02820318. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis: The First Year of Brazilian Experience.紧急启动腹膜透析:巴西首年经验。
Blood Purif. 2017;44(4):283-287. doi: 10.1159/000478970. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
9
Acute PD: Evidence, Guidelines, and Controversies.急性帕金森病:证据、指南与争议
Semin Nephrol. 2017 Jan;37(1):103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2016.10.011.
10
Early and Late Patient Outcomes in Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis.紧急开始腹膜透析的早期和晚期患者结局
Perit Dial Int. 2017 Jul-Aug;37(4):414-419. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00158. Epub 2016 Dec 22.