Eastman Brydon, Wodarz Dominik, Kohandel Mohammad
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Canada; Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention Program in Public Health, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA 92697, USA.
Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo N2L 3G1, Canada; Department of Population Health and Disease Prevention Program in Public Health, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA 92697, USA.
J Theor Biol. 2020 Oct 21;503:110384. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110384. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
The cancer stem cell hypothesis claims that tumor growth and progression are driven by a (typically) small niche of the total cancer cell population called cancer stem cells (CSCs). These CSCs can go through symmetric or asymmetric divisions to differentiate into specialised, progenitor cells or reproduce new CSCs. While it was once held that this differentiation pathway was unidirectional, recent research has demonstrated that differentiated cells are more plastic than initially considered. In particular, differentiated cells can de-differentiate and recover their stem-like capacity. Two recent papers have considered how this rate of plasticity affects the evolutionary dynamic of an invasive, malignant population of stem cells and differentiated cells into existing tissue (Mahdipour-Shirayeh et al., 2017; Wodarz, 2018). These papers arrive at seemingly opposing conclusions, one claiming that increased plasticity results in increased invasive potential, and the other that increased plasticity decreases invasive potential. Here, we show that what is most important, when determining the effect on invasive potential, is how one distributes this increased plasticity between the compartments of resident and mutant-type cells. We also demonstrate how these results vary, producing non-monotone fixation probability curves, as inter-compartmental plasticity changes when differentiated cell compartments are allowed to continue proliferating, highlighting a fundamental difference between the two models. We conclude by demonstrating the stability of these qualitative results over various parameter ranges. Keywords: cancer stem cells, plasticity, de-differentiation, fixation probability.
癌症干细胞假说认为,肿瘤的生长和进展是由(通常)整个癌细胞群体中一小部分被称为癌症干细胞(CSCs)的细胞驱动的。这些癌症干细胞可以进行对称或不对称分裂,分化为特化的祖细胞或产生新的癌症干细胞。虽然曾经认为这种分化途径是单向的,但最近的研究表明,分化细胞比最初认为的更具可塑性。特别是,分化细胞可以去分化并恢复其干细胞样能力。最近有两篇论文探讨了这种可塑性速率如何影响侵入性恶性干细胞和分化细胞群体向现有组织进化的动态过程(Mahdipour-Shirayeh等人,2017年;Wodarz,2018年)。这些论文得出了看似相反的结论,一篇声称可塑性增加会导致侵袭潜力增加,另一篇则认为可塑性增加会降低侵袭潜力。在这里,我们表明,在确定对侵袭潜力的影响时,最重要的是如何在驻留型和突变型细胞区室之间分配这种增加的可塑性。我们还展示了随着分化细胞区室继续增殖时,区室间可塑性发生变化,这些结果如何变化并产生非单调的固定概率曲线,突出了两种模型之间的根本差异。我们通过证明这些定性结果在各种参数范围内的稳定性来得出结论。关键词:癌症干细胞、可塑性、去分化、固定概率