Suppr超能文献

心脏康复计划中一份简短饮食评估问卷的效度和信度

Validity and Reliability of a Brief Dietary Assessment Questionnaire in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Program.

作者信息

Aberegg Ellen Schaaf, Collins Karen K, Hinderliter Judith M, Smalling Sharon L, Fung Teresa T, Gizlice Ziya, Johnston Larry F, Ammerman Alice S, Keyserling Thomas C

机构信息

UNC Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, Chapel Hill, North Carolina (Ms Hinderliter); Memorial Hermann Hospital-Texas Medical Center, Houston (Ms Smalling); Department of Nutrition, Simmons University, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Fung); Department of Nutrition, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Fung); UNC Department of Nutrition, Gillings School of Global Public Health (Dr Ammerman), and Department of Medicine, School of Medicine (Dr Keyserling), UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention (Dr Gizlice and Mr Johnston), Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Ms Aberegg is a consultant, Westerville, Ohio. Ms Collins is a consultant, Jamestown, New York.

出版信息

J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020 Jul;40(4):280-283. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000505.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Dietary assessment is vital to inform individualized nutrition care and to evaluate the success of interventions aimed at improving diet for participants in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of an instrument developed to reflect current evidence-informed dietary recommendations advocated to reduce cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

This study was conducted at a single CR program at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Two dietary assessments were administered: Picture Your Plate (PYP) and a reference instrument, the Harvard/Willett Food Frequency Questionnaire (HWFFQ). The PYP is a modification of a previously validated instrument, the Dietary Risk Assessment-New Leaf (DRA-New Leaf). Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing the PYP total score with 3 diet quality indexes (Alternative Health Eating Index [AHEI], Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH], and Alternative Mediterranean Diet [aMED]) calculated from the HWFFQ and by assessment of agreement in tertile cross-classification. An intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated to assess test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Among the 108 participants, crude and adjusted Spearmen correlation coefficients between the PYP and 3 indexes of dietary quality were AHEI-2010 (0.71-0.72), DASH (0.70-0.71), and aMED (0.52-0.58) (P < .0001, all comparisons). Agreement of tertiles comparing PYP and AHEI-2010 was 67% and the score in opposite tertiles was 6%. The weighted kappa value (κw) = 0.71. The test-retest ICC was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93; n = 91).

CONCLUSIONS

Results support the PYP as a valid and reliable dietary assessment tool for use in CR programs. Continued research in additional CR program populations is recommended.

摘要

目的

饮食评估对于指导个性化营养护理以及评估旨在改善心脏康复(CR)项目参与者饮食的干预措施的成效至关重要。本研究的目的是评估一种为反映当前倡导的降低心血管风险的循证饮食建议而开发的工具的有效性和可靠性。

方法

本研究在北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校的一个CR项目中进行。进行了两次饮食评估:“描绘你的餐盘”(PYP)和一种参考工具,即哈佛/威利特食物频率问卷(HWFFQ)。PYP是对先前经过验证的工具“饮食风险评估 - 新叶”(DRA - 新叶)的修改。通过将PYP总分与根据HWFFQ计算的3种饮食质量指数(替代健康饮食指数[AHEI]、终止高血压饮食方法[DASH]和替代地中海饮食[aMED])进行比较,并通过评估三分位数交叉分类中的一致性来评估同时效度。计算组内相关系数(ICC)以评估重测信度。

结果

在108名参与者中,PYP与3种饮食质量指数之间的原始和校正斯皮尔曼相关系数分别为AHEI - 2010(0.71 - 0.72)、DASH(0.70 - 0.71)和aMED(0.52 - 0.58)(所有比较的P <.0001)。比较PYP和AHEI - 2010的三分位数一致性为67%,相反三分位数中的得分率为6%。加权kappa值(κw)= 0.71。重测ICC为0.91(95%CI,0.85 - 0.93;n = 91)。

结论

结果支持PYP作为CR项目中一种有效且可靠的饮食评估工具。建议在更多CR项目人群中继续开展研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验