• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据罗伯逊十组分类系统对葡萄牙一家三级医院剖宫产率的分析。

Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System.

机构信息

Departamento de Ginecologia, Obstetrícia e Medicina da Reprodução, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;42(6):310-315. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712127. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1712127
PMID:32604433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10418145/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Robson 10 group classification system (RTGCS) is a reproducible, clinically relevant and prospective classification system proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing cesarean section (CS) rates. The purpose of the present study is to analyze CS rates according to the RTGCS over a 3-year period and to identify the main contributors to this rate.

METHODS

We reviewed data regarding deliveries performed from 2014 up to 2016 in a tertiary hospital in Portugal, and classified all women according to the RTGCS. We analyzed the CS rate in each group.

RESULTS

We included data from 6,369 deliveries. Groups 1 ( = 1,703), 2 ( = 1,229) and 3 ( = 1,382) represented 67.7% of the obstetric population. The global CS rate was 25% ( = 1,594). Groups 1, 2, 5 and 10 were responsible for 74.2% of global CS deliveries.

CONCLUSION

As expected, Groups 1, 2, 5 and 10 were the greatest contributors to the overall CS rate. An attempt to increase the number of vaginal deliveries in these groups, especially in Groups 2 and 5, might contribute to the reduction of the CS rate.

摘要

目的

罗伯逊 10 组分类系统(RTGCS)是世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的一种可重复、具有临床相关性和前瞻性的分类系统,作为评估、监测和比较剖宫产率的全球标准。本研究的目的是根据 RTGCS 在 3 年内分析剖宫产率,并确定导致这一比率的主要因素。

方法

我们回顾了葡萄牙一家三级医院 2014 年至 2016 年期间的分娩数据,并根据 RTGCS 对所有妇女进行分类。我们分析了每个组的剖宫产率。

结果

我们纳入了 6369 例分娩的数据。第 1 组( = 1703)、第 2 组( = 1229)和第 3 组( = 1382)占产科人群的 67.7%。全球剖宫产率为 25%( = 1594)。第 1、2、5 和 10 组负责全球 74.2%的剖宫产分娩。

结论

正如预期的那样,第 1、2、5 和 10 组是导致总体剖宫产率的最大因素。尝试增加这些组中阴道分娩的数量,特别是第 2 和第 5 组,可能有助于降低剖宫产率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a93b/10418145/53f08a27ccb8/10-1055-s-0040-1712127-i180384-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a93b/10418145/53f08a27ccb8/10-1055-s-0040-1712127-i180384-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a93b/10418145/53f08a27ccb8/10-1055-s-0040-1712127-i180384-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System.根据罗伯逊十组分类系统对葡萄牙一家三级医院剖宫产率的分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2020 Jun;42(6):310-315. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712127. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
2
Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院使用罗布森十组分类法确定降低剖宫产率的产科目标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Caesarean section rates in a tertiary teaching hospital in northern Uganda: a retrospective analysis using the robson ten group classification system.乌干达北部一所三级教学医院的剖宫产率:应用罗伯逊十组分类系统的回顾性分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 20;24(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06689-4.
4
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
5
Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.三级教学医院中按罗伯逊十组分类的剖宫产分娩变化趋势。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Dec;91(12):1422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
6
Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.高剖宫产率的合理剖析:使用罗布森十组分类系统的分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):534-9. doi: 10.1111/jog.12608. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
7
Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.立陶宛采用罗布森十组分类系统的剖宫产率。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2015 Nov;51(5):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Rationalisation of the caesarean section rate in a tertiary referral hospital using the Robson classification.应用罗伯逊分类法使一家三级转诊医院的剖宫产率合理化。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Feb;41(2):200-206. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1718625. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
Utility of the Robson Ten Group Classification System to determine appropriateness of caesarean section at a rural regional hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.罗布森十组分类系统在南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一家农村地区医院确定剖宫产适宜性方面的效用。
S Afr Med J. 2015 Apr;105(4):292-5. doi: 10.7196/samj.9405.
10
Caesarean section rates: applying the modified ten-group Robson classification in an Australian tertiary hospital.剖宫产率:在澳大利亚一所三级医院应用改良的 Robson 十组分类法。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):61-66. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1873923. Epub 2021 May 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A 10-year cesarean section rate analysis in a Brazilian referral maternity hospital using the Robson's ten group classification system.在一家巴西转诊妇产医院使用罗布森十组分类系统进行的10年剖宫产率分析。
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 15;47. doi: 10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo51. eCollection 2025.
2
Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital.在一家西班牙三级医院应用改良的十组罗布森分类法。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):252. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010252.

本文引用的文献

1
Breech Presentation: Vaginal Versus Cesarean Delivery, Which Intervention Leads to the Best Outcomes?臀位分娩:经阴道分娩与剖宫产,哪种干预措施能带来最佳结局?
Acta Med Port. 2017 Jun 30;30(6):479-484. doi: 10.20344/amp.7920.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Foley Catheter Balloon for Cervix Priming in Term Pregnancy.足月妊娠中 Foley 导尿管球囊用于宫颈准备的有效性和安全性
Acta Med Port. 2017 Apr 28;30(4):281-284. doi: 10.20344/amp.8003.
3
Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth.
使用罗布森分类法评估巴西的剖宫产率:分娩支付来源的作用。
Reprod Health. 2016 Oct 17;13(Suppl 3):128. doi: 10.1186/s12978-016-0228-7.
4
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson's Ten-group Classification.使用罗布森十组分类法检查剖宫产率
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
5
Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries.剖宫产10组分类系统的最佳实践建议。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Nov;135(2):232-233. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
6
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.世界卫生组织关于剖宫产率的声明。
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
7
Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.立陶宛采用罗布森十组分类系统的剖宫产率。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2015 Nov;51(5):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Prediction of Success in External Cephalic Version under Tocolysis: Still a Challenge.在宫缩抑制剂作用下进行外倒转术成功的预测:仍然是一项挑战。
Acta Med Port. 2015 Sep-Oct;28(5):554-8. doi: 10.20344/amp.6179. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
9
What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.在人群层面,剖宫产的最佳比率是多少?生态学研究的系统评价。
Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 21;12:57. doi: 10.1186/s12978-015-0043-6.
10
Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院使用罗布森十组分类法确定降低剖宫产率的产科目标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Apr 9.