• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三级教学医院中按罗伯逊十组分类的剖宫产分娩变化趋势。

Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore National University Health Systems, Singapore.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Dec;91(12):1422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x
PMID:22897799
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse changing trends of cesarean section (CS) birth rates over an 11 year period (2000-2010) using the Robson Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS) to identify the main contributors to the rising CS birth rates at a tertiary teaching hospital in Singapore.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

National University Hospital, Singapore.

POPULATION

All women who delivered between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010 (hospital maternity database).

METHODS

The RTGCS was used to classify these women according to parity, past obstetric history, singleton or multiple pregnancy, fetal presentation, gestational age and mode of onset of labor/delivery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The RTGCS results.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2010 the CS rate increased from 19.9 to 29.6 per 100 births. Multiparous women with a previous cesarean birth (Group 5) were the greatest contributor to the CS rate, followed by nulliparous women with singleton cephalic full-term pregnancy in spontaneous labor (Group 1). These two groups contributed to 75% of the rise in the CS rate from 2000 to 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in CS rate is attributed largely to the rising CS rate in Group 5, followed by Group 1. We propose that future efforts to reduce overall CS rate should be focused on increasing vaginal birth after cesarean and reduce CS rates in nulliparous women with singleton cephalic full-term pregnancy (Groups 1 and 2), which in turn will reduce the number of pregnant women with a previous CS.

摘要

目的

使用 Robson 十组分类系统(RTGCS)分析 11 年间剖宫产率的变化趋势,以确定新加坡一所三级教学医院剖宫产率上升的主要原因。

设计

回顾性研究。

地点

新加坡国立大学医院。

人群

2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间在该院分娩的所有女性(医院产妇数据库)。

方法

使用 RTGCS 根据产妇的产次、产科史、单胎或多胎妊娠、胎儿先露部位、胎龄和临产方式对这些女性进行分类。

主要观察指标

RTGCS 结果。

结果

2000 年至 2010 年,剖宫产率从 19.9%上升至 29.6%。有剖宫产史的多产妇(第 5 组)是剖宫产率上升的最大贡献者,其次是自然临产的初产妇、单胎头位足月妊娠(第 1 组)。这两组导致 2000 年至 2010 年剖宫产率上升了 75%。

结论

剖宫产率的上升主要归因于第 5 组剖宫产率的上升,其次是第 1 组。我们建议,未来降低剖宫产率的努力应集中在增加剖宫产后阴道分娩率,降低初产妇、单胎头位足月妊娠(第 1 组和第 2 组)的剖宫产率,这将减少有剖宫产史的孕妇人数。

相似文献

1
Changing trends of cesarean section births by the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary teaching hospital.三级教学医院中按罗伯逊十组分类的剖宫产分娩变化趋势。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Dec;91(12):1422-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01529.x. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
2
Identification of obstetric targets for reducing cesarean section rate using the Robson Ten Group Classification in a tertiary level hospital.在一家三级医院使用罗布森十组分类法确定降低剖宫产率的产科目标。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:91-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
3
Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997-2006.1997 - 2006年昆士兰州剖宫产分娩的趋势及决定因素
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49(6):606-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01100.x.
4
A new way of looking at Caesarean section births.看待剖宫产分娩的一种新方式。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Aug;47(4):316-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00753.x.
5
Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.高剖宫产率的合理剖析:使用罗布森十组分类系统的分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Apr;41(4):534-9. doi: 10.1111/jog.12608. Epub 2014 Nov 5.
6
Analysis of Caesarean Section Rates Using the Robson Classification System at a University Hospital in Spain.西班牙某大学附属医院应用罗伯逊分类系统分析剖宫产率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 29;17(5):1575. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051575.
7
Cesarean section rates in Lithuania using Robson Ten Group Classification System.立陶宛采用罗布森十组分类系统的剖宫产率。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2015 Nov;51(5):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Multiple pregnancy is the leading contributor to cesarean sections in in vitro fertilization pregnancies: An analysis using the Robson 10-group classification system.多胎妊娠是体外受精妊娠剖宫产的主要原因:一项使用罗布森10组分类系统的分析。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Sep;42(9):1141-5. doi: 10.1111/jog.13032. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
9
Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.足月时剖宫产率上升:一个令人担忧的趋势。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Aug;157(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
10
The Robson ten-group classification system for appraising deliveries at a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.巴西一家三级转诊医院用于评估分娩情况的罗布森十组分类系统。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;129(3):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.11.026. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Review of Decision to Delivery Time Interval for Foetal Distress at a Central Hospital.一家中心医院胎儿窘迫从诊断到分娩时间间隔的回顾性研究
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Dec 14;14:1723-1732. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S382518. eCollection 2022.
2
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
3
MEchanical DIlatation of the Cervix-- in a Scarred uterus (MEDICS): the study protocol of a randomised controlled trial comparing a single cervical catheter balloon and prostaglandin PGE2 for cervical ripening and labour induction following caesarean delivery.
经剖宫产术后机械性宫颈扩张(MEDICS):比较单宫颈导管球囊与前列腺素 PGE2 用于宫颈成熟和剖宫产术后引产的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e028896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028896.
4
Monitoring caesarean births using the Robson ten group classification system: A cross-sectional survey of private for-profit facilities in urban Bangladesh.使用 Robson 十组分类系统监测剖宫产分娩:孟加拉国城市私立营利性医疗机构的横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220693. eCollection 2019.
5
National policies and care provision in pregnancy and childbirth for twins in Eastern and Southern Africa: A mixed-methods multi-country study.东非和南非妊娠和分娩中双胎的国家政策和照护提供:一项混合方法多国研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Feb 19;16(2):e1002749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002749. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Caesarean section in Palestine using the Robson Ten Group Classification System: a population-based birth cohort study.巴勒斯坦剖宫产采用罗布森十组分类系统:一项基于人群的出生队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 24;8(10):e022875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022875.
7
Role of maternal characteristics and epidural analgesia on caesarean section rate in groups 1 and 3 according to Robson's classification: a cohort study in an Italian university hospital setting.根据罗布森分类法,产妇特征和硬膜外镇痛对第1组和第3组剖宫产率的影响:意大利大学医院环境下的一项队列研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e020011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020011.
8
A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study.一种使用十组分类系统评估产科结局的方法:一项定量描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e016192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016192.
9
Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.对于低风险初产妇分娩,独立助产单元是产科单元的安全替代选择吗?一项匹配队列研究中按产次分析效应差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 9;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1208-1.
10
Audit of Caesarean Section Births in Small Private Maternity Homes: Analysis of 15-Year Data Applying the Modified Robson Criteria, Canada.加拿大小型私立妇产医院剖宫产分娩情况审计:应用改良罗布森标准对15年数据的分析
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):289-94. doi: 10.1007/s13224-016-0894-y. Epub 2016 May 9.