Suppr超能文献

实验室条件下五种药用植物提取物对(半翅目:蚜科)及其捕食者(脉翅目:草蛉科)的评价

Evaluation of Five Medicinal Plant Extracts on (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Its Predator, (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) under Laboratory Conditions.

作者信息

Sayed Samy M, Alotaibi Saqer S, Gaber Nevien, Elarrnaouty Sayed-Ashraf

机构信息

Department of Economic Entomology and Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt.

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Taif University, Taif 888, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Insects. 2020 Jun 26;11(6):398. doi: 10.3390/insects11060398.

Abstract

Botanical insecticides that degrade rapidly are safer than persistent synthetic chemical insecticides, less harmful to the environment, decrease production costs and are not likely to cause insecticide resistance among pests. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of five different botanical extracts on the bean aphid, and the 2nd larval instar of the green lacewing, under laboratory conditions. Also, the flavonoids in the methanolic extracts of these tested plants were detected using HPLC analysis. The data from the HPLC analysis indicated that the tested plants differed in their flavonoid components. The total flavonoids were 869.4, 1125.6, 721.4, 1667.8 and 2025.9 mg/kg in , , , and , respectively. Moreover, there were many variations among these plants in the amount of each compound. The lethal concentration (LC) value of extract on aphids was the lowest among all of the plants (128.546 µg/mL) followed by (626.461 µg/mL). Also, the LC value of extract on the 2nd larval instar of (232.095 µg/mL) was significantly lower than those of all other four plant species extracts, while the other four plants did not show significant differences among them according to relative median potency analyses. Accordingly, extract had a strong effect on aphids and was safest for the predator. This finding suggests that could be exploited and further developed as an effective plant extract-based insecticide to be utilized in integrated pest management (IPM) programs against .

摘要

降解迅速的植物源杀虫剂比持久性合成化学杀虫剂更安全,对环境危害更小,能降低生产成本,且不太可能导致害虫产生抗药性。本研究旨在评估五种不同植物提取物在实验室条件下对豆蚜和草蛉二龄幼虫的影响。此外,还使用高效液相色谱分析检测了这些受试植物甲醇提取物中的黄酮类化合物。高效液相色谱分析的数据表明,受试植物的黄酮类成分存在差异。在[植物名称1]、[植物名称2]、[植物名称3]、[植物名称4]和[植物名称5]中,总黄酮含量分别为869.4、1125.6、721.4、1667.8和2025.9毫克/千克。此外,这些植物中每种化合物的含量也存在许多差异。[植物名称1]提取物对蚜虫的致死浓度(LC)值在所有植物中最低(128.546微克/毫升),其次是[植物名称2](626.461微克/毫升)。同样,[植物名称3]提取物对草蛉二龄幼虫的LC值(232.095微克/毫升)显著低于其他四种植物提取物,而根据相对中位效力分析,其他四种植物之间没有显著差异。因此,[植物名称3]提取物对蚜虫有很强的作用,对捕食者最安全。这一发现表明,[植物名称3]可以作为一种有效的植物源杀虫剂进行开发和进一步利用,用于针对[害虫名称]的综合害虫管理(IPM)计划。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Comparative conventional preventive strategies for insect pest of okra.秋葵害虫的比较传统预防策略。
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022 May;29(5):3114-3121. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.03.022. Epub 2022 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验