• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习技术从与波速和共振频率相关的动态模量预测混凝土的静态模量和抗压强度

Prediction of Static Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete from Dynamic Modulus Associated with Wave Velocity and Resonance Frequency Using Machine Learning Techniques.

作者信息

Park Jong Yil, Sim Sung-Han, Yoon Young Geun, Oh Tae Keun

机构信息

Department of Safety Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Korea.

School of Civil, Architectural Engineering and Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 27;13(13):2886. doi: 10.3390/ma13132886.

DOI:10.3390/ma13132886
PMID:32605042
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7372401/
Abstract

The static elastic modulus () and compressive strength () are critical properties of concrete. When determining and , concrete cores are collected and subjected to destructive tests. However, destructive tests require certain test permissions and large sample sizes. Hence, it is preferable to predict using the dynamic elastic modulus (), through nondestructive evaluations. A resonance frequency test performed according to ASTM C215-14 and a pressure wave (P-wave) measurement conducted according to ASTM C597M-16 are typically used to determine . Recently, developments in transducers have enabled the measurement of a shear wave (S-wave) velocities in concrete. Although various equations have been proposed for estimating and from , their results deviate from experimental values. Thus, it is necessary to obtain a reliable value for accurately predicting and . In this study, values were experimentally obtained from P-wave and S-wave velocities in the longitudinal and transverse modes; and values were predicted using these values through four machine learning (ML) methods: support vector machine, artificial neural networks, ensembles, and linear regression. Using ML, the prediction accuracy of and was improved by 2.5-5% and 7-9%, respectively, compared with the accuracy obtained using classical or normal-regression equations. By combining ML methods, the accuracy of the predicted and was improved by 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively, compared with the optimal single variable results.

摘要

静态弹性模量( )和抗压强度( )是混凝土的关键性能。在测定 和 时,要采集混凝土芯样并进行破坏性试验。然而,破坏性试验需要特定的试验许可且样本量较大。因此,通过无损评估利用动态弹性模量( )来预测 更为可取。通常采用根据ASTM C215 - 14进行的共振频率试验以及根据ASTM C597M - 16进行的压力波(P波)测量来确定 。近年来,传感器技术的发展使得能够测量混凝土中的剪切波(S波)速度。尽管已经提出了各种从 估算 和 的方程,但其结果与实验值存在偏差。因此,有必要获得可靠的 值以准确预测 和 。在本研究中,通过纵向和横向模式下的P波和S波速度实验获得了 值;并使用支持向量机、人工神经网络、集成方法和线性回归这四种机器学习(ML)方法,利用这些 值预测了 和 值。与使用经典或普通回归方程获得的精度相比,使用ML分别将 和 的预测精度提高了2.5 - 5%和7 - 9%。与最优单变量结果相比,通过组合ML方法,预测的 和 的精度分别提高了0.5%和1.5%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/270853c0c6c0/materials-13-02886-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/6f6baf47bdd8/materials-13-02886-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/73c0309c876b/materials-13-02886-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/13734ac146de/materials-13-02886-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/8638d5d8ada5/materials-13-02886-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/89340598a563/materials-13-02886-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/d766b3414394/materials-13-02886-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/51133e27834b/materials-13-02886-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/2ada68850fb1/materials-13-02886-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/6c840cf23a6d/materials-13-02886-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/066c3eeebece/materials-13-02886-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/09aa8979ff53/materials-13-02886-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/63b537591665/materials-13-02886-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/2013729618e0/materials-13-02886-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/eabdf7cbcb8e/materials-13-02886-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/1bb0d5c2fd2e/materials-13-02886-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/f7f8db4fdb69/materials-13-02886-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/df1798b894ad/materials-13-02886-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/270853c0c6c0/materials-13-02886-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/6f6baf47bdd8/materials-13-02886-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/73c0309c876b/materials-13-02886-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/13734ac146de/materials-13-02886-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/8638d5d8ada5/materials-13-02886-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/89340598a563/materials-13-02886-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/d766b3414394/materials-13-02886-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/51133e27834b/materials-13-02886-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/2ada68850fb1/materials-13-02886-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/6c840cf23a6d/materials-13-02886-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/066c3eeebece/materials-13-02886-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/09aa8979ff53/materials-13-02886-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/63b537591665/materials-13-02886-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/2013729618e0/materials-13-02886-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/eabdf7cbcb8e/materials-13-02886-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/1bb0d5c2fd2e/materials-13-02886-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/f7f8db4fdb69/materials-13-02886-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/df1798b894ad/materials-13-02886-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1633/7372401/270853c0c6c0/materials-13-02886-g018.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Static Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete from Dynamic Modulus Associated with Wave Velocity and Resonance Frequency Using Machine Learning Techniques.利用机器学习技术从与波速和共振频率相关的动态模量预测混凝土的静态模量和抗压强度
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jun 27;13(13):2886. doi: 10.3390/ma13132886.
2
Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Residual Mechanical Properties of Heat-Damaged Concrete for Nuclear Reactor Auxiliary Buildings in Korea Using Elastic Wave Velocity Measurements.利用弹性波速度测量评估韩国核反应堆辅助建筑热损伤混凝土的静态和动态残余力学性能
Materials (Basel). 2019 Aug 23;12(17):2695. doi: 10.3390/ma12172695.
3
Effects of Saturation Levels on the Ultrasonic Pulse Velocities and Mechanical Properties of Concrete.饱和度对混凝土超声脉冲速度和力学性能的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 31;14(1):152. doi: 10.3390/ma14010152.
4
Influence of Selected Factors on the Relationship between the Dynamic Elastic Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete.所选因素对混凝土动态弹性模量与抗压强度关系的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;11(4):477. doi: 10.3390/ma11040477.
5
Effect of Moisture Condition of Structural Lightweight Concretes on Specified Values of Static and Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity.结构轻集料混凝土的湿度条件对静态和动态弹性模量规定值的影响
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jun 10;16(12):4299. doi: 10.3390/ma16124299.
6
Concrete Compressive Strength by Means of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Moduli of Elasticity.通过超声脉冲速度和弹性模量测定混凝土抗压强度
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 19;14(22):7018. doi: 10.3390/ma14227018.
7
Moisture Impact on Static and Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity in Structural Normal-Weight Concretes.水分对结构普通重量混凝土静、动弹性模量的影响
Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 27;17(15):3722. doi: 10.3390/ma17153722.
8
Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks.利用超声脉冲速度和人工神经网络预测混凝土强度
Ultrasonics. 2009 Jan;49(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.001. Epub 2008 May 23.
9
Correlation Analysis of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Mechanical Properties of Normal Aggregate and Lightweight Aggregate Concretes in 30-60 MPa Range.30 - 60兆帕范围内普通集料和轻集料混凝土的超声脉冲速度与力学性能的相关性分析
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 18;15(8):2952. doi: 10.3390/ma15082952.
10
Design of Concrete Mix Proportion Based on Particle Packing Voidage and Test Research on Compressive Strength and Elastic Modulus of Concrete.基于颗粒堆积空隙率的混凝土配合比设计及混凝土抗压强度与弹性模量试验研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;14(3):623. doi: 10.3390/ma14030623.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic literature review on the application of machine learning for the prediction of properties of different types of concrete.关于机器学习在预测不同类型混凝土性能方面应用的系统文献综述。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024 May 16;10:e1853. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1853. eCollection 2024.
2
Testing of Materials and Elements in Civil Engineering.土木工程中的材料与构件测试
Materials (Basel). 2021 Jun 20;14(12):3412. doi: 10.3390/ma14123412.

本文引用的文献

1
Learned Prediction of Compressive Strength of GGBFS Concrete Using Hybrid Artificial Neural Network Models.基于混合人工神经网络模型的矿渣粉混凝土抗压强度的学习预测
Materials (Basel). 2019 Nov 10;12(22):3708. doi: 10.3390/ma12223708.
2
Influence of Selected Factors on the Relationship between the Dynamic Elastic Modulus and Compressive Strength of Concrete.所选因素对混凝土动态弹性模量与抗压强度关系的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 22;11(4):477. doi: 10.3390/ma11040477.
3
Improving Non-Destructive Concrete Strength Tests Using Support Vector Machines.
使用支持向量机改进混凝土强度无损检测
Materials (Basel). 2015 Oct 22;8(10):7169-7178. doi: 10.3390/ma8105368.