Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (NCRC-ND), Beijing, China.
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020 Jun;5(2):128-137. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000305. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
The effect of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) and intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) on stroke outcomes remains unclear.
Data of 1045 patients with minor stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) were obtained from 45 sites of the Clopidogrel in High-Risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial. We assessed the associations of burdens of CSVD and ICAS with new strokes and bleeding events using multivariate Cox regression models and those with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores using ordinal logistic regression models.
Among the 1045 patients, CSVD was present in 830 cases (79.4%) and ICAS in 460 (44.0%). Patients with >1 ICAS segment showed the highest risk of new strokes (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.56, p=0.01). No association between CSVD and the occurrence of new strokes was found. The presence of severe CSVD (common OR (cOR) 2.01, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.89, p<0.001) and >1 ICAS segment (cOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.93, p<0.001) was associated with higher mRS scores. Severe CSVD (HR 10.70, 95% CI 1.16 to 99.04, p=0.04), but not ICAS, was associated with a higher risk of bleeding events. Six-point modified CSVD score improved the predictive power for bleeding events and disability.
CSVD is associated with more disability and bleeding events, and ICAS is associated with an increased risk of stroke and disability in patients with minor stroke and TIA at 3 months. CSVD and ICAS may represent different vascular pathologies and play distinct roles in stroke outcomes.
NCT00979589.
脑小血管病(CSVD)和颅内动脉狭窄(ICAS)对卒中结局的影响仍不清楚。
我们从氯吡格雷治疗急性非致残性脑血管事件高危患者(CHANCE)试验的 45 个试验点获得了 1045 例小卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者的数据。我们使用多变量 Cox 回归模型评估 CSVD 和 ICAS 负担与新发卒中和出血事件的相关性,并使用有序逻辑回归模型评估其与改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分的相关性。
在 1045 例患者中,830 例(79.4%)存在 CSVD,460 例(44.0%)存在 ICAS。存在>1 个 ICAS 节段的患者发生新发卒中和出血事件的风险最高(HR 2.03,95%CI 1.153.56,p=0.01)。CSVD 与新发卒中和出血事件的发生无相关性。严重 CSVD(常见比值比(cOR)2.01,95%CI 1.402.89,p<0.001)和>1 个 ICAS 节段(cOR 2.15,95%CI 1.572.93,p<0.001)与较高的 mRS 评分相关。严重 CSVD(HR 10.70,95%CI 1.1699.04,p=0.04)而非 ICAS 与出血事件风险升高相关。6 分改良 CSVD 评分可提高对出血事件和残疾的预测能力。
CSVD 与较高的残疾和出血事件风险相关,而 ICAS 与小卒中和 TIA 患者 3 个月时的卒中风险和残疾相关。CSVD 和 ICAS 可能代表不同的血管病理,并在卒中结局中发挥不同的作用。
NCT00979589。