Suppr超能文献

纳布啡与咪达唑仑作为鞘内注射布比卡因辅助用药用于剖宫产术后镇痛的比较

Nalbuphine versus Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Section.

作者信息

Amin Olfat Abdelmoniem Ibrahem, Ibrahem Mohamed Abdel-Moniem, Salem Dina Abdelhameed Elsadek

机构信息

Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Alsharkia, Egypt.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2020 Jun 11;13:1369-1376. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S242545. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adding adjuvants to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine provides long analgesic duration with less adverse effects. The aim of this study was to compare intrathecal nalbuphine versus midazolam in patients undergoing cesarean section.

CLINICAL TRIAL ID

NCT03918187.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective randomized controlled study conducted on 90 females undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia who were randomly allocated to three equal groups of 30 patients each: group C received hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg plus 0.5 mL saline, group N received hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg plus 1 mg nalbuphine, group M received hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg plus 2.5 mg midazolam. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block, effective analgesic time, analgesic requirements, adverse effects, sedation, and Apgar scores were recorded.

RESULTS

There was significant rapid onset of sensory and motor block (1.95±.44 and 3.50±0.43 min) with slower regression of sensory block and time to bromage I (211.6±13.2 and 219.8±20.2 min) in group N compared to groups M, C (p < 0.001), with statistically significant rapid onset and long duration of both blocks in group M compared to C (p<0.001). The effective analgesic time was significantly prolonged in group N (263.7±16.3) compared to groups M and C (224.2 ± 18.6, 185.5±17.45), respectively, (p<0.001) and prolonged in group M compared to C (p<0.001), with increase in analgesic requirement in group C compared to groups N and M (p<0.001) and no significant difference between groups N and M. There was higher sedation score in groups N, M (1.78±0.63, 2.75±0.54), respectively, compared to group C (0.61±0.12) (p<0.001) with lower Apgar score in group M (6.9±0.73) at one minute than in groups N, C (7.1±0.91, 7.7±0.84) (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between groups regarding the adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Adding 1 mg nalbuphine to 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine provided more effective postoperative analgesia than adding 2.5 mg midazolam, with less non-significant adverse effects in midazolam group in patients undergoing elective cesarean section.

摘要

背景与目的

向鞘内注射的高比重布比卡因中添加佐剂可延长镇痛时间,且不良反应较少。本研究旨在比较剖宫产患者鞘内注射纳布啡与咪达唑仑的效果。

临床试验编号

NCT03918187。

患者与方法

这是一项前瞻性随机对照研究,对90例接受脊髓麻醉下剖宫产的女性进行研究,她们被随机分为三组,每组30例:C组接受12.5mg高比重布比卡因加0.5mL生理盐水,N组接受12.5mg高比重布比卡因加1mg纳布啡,M组接受12.5mg高比重布比卡因加2.5mg咪达唑仑。记录感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间和持续时间、有效镇痛时间、镇痛需求、不良反应、镇静情况及阿氏评分。

结果

与M组、C组相比,N组感觉和运动阻滞起效显著更快(分别为1.95±.44和3.50±0.43分钟),感觉阻滞消退较慢,达到 Bromage I级的时间较长(分别为211.6±13.2和219.8±20.2分钟)(p<0.001);与C组相比,M组两种阻滞的起效均显著更快且持续时间更长(p<0.001)。与M组和C组(分别为224.2 ± 18.6、185.5±17.45)相比,N组的有效镇痛时间显著延长(263.7±16.3)(p<0.001),M组与C组相比也延长(p<0.001);与N组和M组相比,C组的镇痛需求增加(p<0.001),N组和M组之间无显著差异。与C组(0.61±0.12)相比,N组、M组的镇静评分更高(分别为1.78±0.63、2.75±0.54)(p<0.001);与N组、C组(分别为7.1±0.91、7.7±0.84)相比,M组在1分钟时的阿氏评分更低(6.9±0.73)(p<0.001)。各组之间不良反应无显著差异。

结论

在12.5mg高比重布比卡因中添加1mg纳布啡比添加2.5mg咪达唑仑提供了更有效的术后镇痛,在择期剖宫产患者中,咪达唑仑组的非显著不良反应较少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9981/7295533/502b658615f5/JPR-13-1369-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验