Kusnoor Sheila V, Blasingame Mallory N, Williams Annette M, DesAutels Spencer J, Su Jing, Giuse Nunzia Bettinsoli
Center for Knowledge Management, Strategy and Innovation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
JAMIA Open. 2019 Dec 26;3(1):126-131. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz066. eCollection 2020 Apr.
The United States transitioned to the tenth version of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system (ICD-10) for mortality coding in 1999 and to the International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS) on October 1, 2015. The purpose of this study was to conduct a narrative literature review to better understand the impact of the implementation of ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS.
We searched English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Business Source Complete and reviewed websites of relevant professional associations, government agencies, research groups, and ICD-10 news aggregators to identify literature on the impact of the ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS transition. We used Google to search for additional gray literature and used handsearching of the references of the most on-target articles to help ensure comprehensiveness.
Impact areas reported in the literature include: productivity and staffing, costs, reimbursement, coding accuracy, mapping between ICD versions, morbidity and mortality surveillance, and patient care. With the exception of morbidity and mortality surveillance, quantitative studies describing the actual impact of the ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation were limited and much of the literature was based on the ICD-10-CM/PCS transition rather than the earlier conversion to ICD-10 for mortality coding.
This study revealed several gaps in the literature that limit the ability to draw reliable conclusions about the overall impact, positive or negative, of moving to ICD-10/ICD-10-CM/PCS in the United States.
These knowledge gaps present an opportunity for future research and knowledge sharing and will be important to consider when planning for ICD-11.
美国于1999年过渡到国际疾病分类(ICD)系统的第十版(ICD - 10)用于死亡率编码,并于2015年10月1日过渡到国际疾病分类临床修订版和手术编码系统(ICD - 10 - CM/PCS)。本研究的目的是进行一项叙述性文献综述,以更好地了解ICD - 10/ICD - 10 - CM/PCS实施的影响。
我们在PubMed、科学网和商业资源全文数据库中检索英文文章,并查阅了相关专业协会、政府机构、研究小组和ICD - 10新闻聚合器的网站,以识别有关ICD - 10/ICD - 10 - CM/PCS过渡影响的文献。我们使用谷歌搜索其他灰色文献,并对最相关文章的参考文献进行手工检索,以确保全面性。
文献中报道的影响领域包括:生产力与人员配备、成本、报销、编码准确性、ICD版本之间的映射、发病率和死亡率监测以及患者护理。除发病率和死亡率监测外,描述ICD - 10/ICD - 10 - CM/PCS实施实际影响的定量研究有限,并且大部分文献基于ICD - 10 - CM/PCS过渡,而非早期向ICD - 10的死亡率编码转换。
本研究揭示了文献中的几个空白,这些空白限制了就美国转向ICD - 10/ICD - 10 - CM/PCS的总体影响(正面或负面)得出可靠结论的能力。
这些知识空白为未来的研究和知识共享提供了机会,并且在规划ICD - 11时予以考虑将很重要。