Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, ON, Canada.
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;28(2):251-260. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12671. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: In mental healthcare environments, there are times when people are forced into care (i.e. to take medications or be hospitalized) when they may not want it. It is difficult to understand how person-centred care (i.e. supporting patients to lead decisions about their care) can occur within coercive settings. There is a gap in the literature about this topic as few studies have explored it. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This paper examines the research publicly available to better understand if person-centred care can exist at times when people are forced into mental health care. The paper develops a conceptual framework, RAISe (Relationship, Agency, Information, Safe environment), for understanding this matter in order to help people apply this concept in practice In certain situations, with caring and respectful approaches, with and for patients, it is possible to provide person-centred care at times when mental health care is forced. RAISe identifies ways in which this can be done by clinicians while working with people. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: These person-centred approaches need to be applied across mental health systems so that people in forced mental healthcare scenarios continue to experience dignity and respect. This is particularly important for nurses who are often the ones providing direct care to patients in these environments. ABSTRACT: Introduction Person-centred care (PCC) is founded on a theoretical premise that the person who the care issue pertains to directs the decisions relating to them. This can raise ethical challenges when mental health care is forced. Aim This paper reports on how PCC is provided in coercive mental healthcare environments and its outcomes, where reported. Method A scoping review methodology was utilized to search the literature in English until December 2019 (inclusive). Results Twenty articles were included in the review. The information found was diverse and addressed different aspects of PCC in coercive mental healthcare environments. Discussion Overall, this area is understudied. Despite ethical challenges, there are opportunities to provide PCC in coercive mental healthcare environments. A novel conceptual framework, RAISe (Relationship, Agency, Information, Safe environment), is presented to assist in applying PCC in these environments. Further research investigating how to employ these practices across systems should occur. Implications for Practice This review acknowledges the challenges of providing PCC in coercive mental healthcare environments, while suggesting that this type of care can still be delivered in general as well as specific ways. This is especially relevant for nurses who provide direct care within these environments.
在精神保健环境中,有时会有人被迫接受护理(例如服用药物或住院),而他们可能并不愿意。在强制环境中,很难理解如何实现以患者为中心的护理(即支持患者做出有关护理的决策)。由于很少有研究探讨这个主题,因此文献中存在空白。本文的贡献:本文研究了公开的研究资料,以更好地了解在人们被迫接受精神保健时,以患者为中心的护理是否可以存在。本文提出了一个概念框架 RAISe(关系、能动性、信息、安全环境),以帮助人们理解这一问题,以便在实践中帮助人们应用这一概念。在某些情况下,通过关怀和尊重的方法,与患者一起并为患者提供护理,在强制进行精神保健时,仍然可以提供以患者为中心的护理。RAISe 确定了临床医生在与患者合作时可以做到这一点的方式。对实践的意义:这些以患者为中心的方法需要在整个精神卫生系统中实施,以便在强制精神保健环境中继续为人们提供尊严和尊重。这对于经常在这些环境中为患者提供直接护理的护士来说尤为重要。摘要:引言 以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的理论前提是,护理问题所涉及的人指导与他们有关的决策。当精神保健被迫进行时,这可能会带来伦理挑战。目的 本研究报告了在强制精神保健环境中提供 PCC 的情况及其结果。方法 采用 scoping 综述方法搜索截至 2019 年 12 月(含)的英文文献。结果 共纳入 20 篇文章。发现的信息多种多样,涉及强制精神保健环境中 PCC 的不同方面。讨论 总体而言,该领域研究不足。尽管存在伦理挑战,但在强制精神保健环境中提供 PCC 仍有机会。提出了一个新的概念框架 RAISe(关系、能动性、信息、安全环境),以帮助在这些环境中应用 PCC。应该进一步研究如何在整个系统中采用这些实践。对实践的影响 本综述承认在强制精神保健环境中提供 PCC 所面临的挑战,同时表明这种类型的护理仍然可以以一般方式和特定方式提供。这对于在这些环境中提供直接护理的护士尤其重要。