• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灾难后恢复进展影响因素的综合路径模型的构建。

Development of an Integrated Pathways Model of Factors Influencing the Progress of Recovery After a Disaster.

机构信息

Bisheshwor Prasad Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal.

Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020 Jul;32(5):226-234. doi: 10.1177/1010539520935386. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1177/1010539520935386
PMID:32608241
Abstract

Disaster recovery is a complex and multidimensional process that is affected by the physical environment, social and economic conditions, and institutional strength and integrity. However, there is a lack of understanding as to why some communities recover quicker than others after experiencing the same disaster event. What are the critical factors needed for optimal disaster recovery and what factors predispose communities or individuals to poor disaster recovery? This article presents a literature-generated integrated pathways model of disaster recovery. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature identified 54 peer-reviewed publications that met our search criteria. The thematic content analysis of that literature revealed 14 factors that affected disaster recovery, which were clustered into 4 domains (social, physical/environmental, economic, and institutional/procedural). The integrated pathways model was developed to accommodate all of the domains and factors identified in the reviewed literature and the mediation and impact pathways that they influence. Using a combination of qualitative and quantitative data collected after the 2015 Nepal earthquake, the authors will examine and verify the interaction between domains and variables to identify those elements that are found in the most recovered and least recovered communities. The aim will be to modify and refine the model and enhance the understanding of the interaction between variables and to produce a data-driven model in order to better understand the factors that impede or enhance disaster recovery.

摘要

灾难恢复是一个复杂的、多维度的过程,受到物理环境、社会经济条件以及制度的强度和完整性的影响。然而,人们对于为什么一些社区在经历同样的灾害事件后比其他社区更快地恢复,缺乏理解。实现最佳灾难恢复需要哪些关键因素,哪些因素使社区或个人容易出现灾难恢复不良的情况?本文提出了一个基于文献的灾难恢复综合途径模型。系统地搜索了同行评议文献,确定了符合我们搜索标准的 54 篇同行评议文献。对这些文献的主题内容分析揭示了影响灾难恢复的 14 个因素,这些因素被分为 4 个领域(社会、物理/环境、经济和制度/程序)。综合途径模型的开发旨在适应文献中确定的所有领域和因素,以及它们影响的中介和影响途径。作者将结合 2015 年尼泊尔地震后收集的定性和定量数据,检验和验证各领域和变量之间的相互作用,以确定在恢复最好和恢复最差的社区中发现的那些要素。目的是修改和完善模型,增强对变量之间相互作用的理解,并建立一个数据驱动的模型,以更好地了解阻碍或增强灾难恢复的因素。

相似文献

1
Development of an Integrated Pathways Model of Factors Influencing the Progress of Recovery After a Disaster.灾难后恢复进展影响因素的综合路径模型的构建。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020 Jul;32(5):226-234. doi: 10.1177/1010539520935386. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
An integrated approach to mental health and disaster preparedness: a cluster comparison with earthquake affected communities in Nepal.心理健康与灾害准备的综合方法:尼泊尔地震灾区的群组比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 15;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1863-z.
3
Lessons from the 2015 earthquake(s) in Nepal: implication for rehabilitation.尼泊尔2015年地震的教训:对灾后重建的启示
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(9):910-3. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1064482. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
4
Health Risks and Challenges in Earthquake Responders in Nepal: A Qualitative Research.尼泊尔地震救援人员的健康风险和挑战:一项定性研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Jun;34(3):274-281. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19004370.
5
Role of regional anaesthesia in disaster medicine: field hospital experience after the 2015 Nepal Earthquake.区域麻醉在灾难医学中的作用:2015年尼泊尔地震后的野战医院经验
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 May;33(5):312-3. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000424.
6
Breaking Through Barriers and Building Disaster Mental Resilience: A Case Study in the Aftermath of the 2015 Nepal Earthquakes.突破障碍,建立灾难心理韧性:尼泊尔 2015 年地震后的案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 17;16(16):2964. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162964.
7
Social entrepreneurship, co-production, and post-disaster recovery.社会创业、共同生产和灾后恢复。
Disasters. 2022 Jan;46(1):27-55. doi: 10.1111/disa.12454. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
8
The 2015 Nepal Earthquake(s): Lessons Learned From the Disability and Rehabilitation Sector's Preparation for, and Response to, Natural Disasters.2015年尼泊尔地震:残疾与康复部门应对自然灾害的经验教训
Phys Ther. 2016 Nov;96(11):1714-1723. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20150677. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
The generative power of metaphor: long-term action research on disaster recovery in a small Japanese village.隐喻的生成力量:日本小村庄灾后恢复的长期行动研究。
Disasters. 2019 Apr;43(2):355-371. doi: 10.1111/disa.12314. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Community Health Workers and Disasters: Lessons Learned from the 2015 Earthquake in Nepal.社区卫生工作者与灾害:从2015年尼泊尔地震中汲取的经验教训。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Dec;32(6):604-609. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X1700680X. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
After the fire: A qualitative study of the role of long-term recovery organizations in addressing rural communities' post-wildfire needs.火灾之后:一项关于长期恢复组织在满足农村社区野火后需求中作用的定性研究
Environ Res Health. 2023 Jun 1;1(2):021009. doi: 10.1088/2752-5309/acd2f7. Epub 2023 May 30.