• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解首例人体细胞治疗试验中同意的自愿性。

Understanding voluntariness of consent in first-in-human cell therapy trials.

机构信息

Medical Ethics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, BMC I12, 22184 Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Regen Med. 2020 May;15(5):1647-1660. doi: 10.2217/rme-2019-0126. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

DOI:10.2217/rme-2019-0126
PMID:32609059
Abstract

Consensus about contents of voluntariness in informed consent is lacking. Core criteria for voluntary consent are needed to ensure voluntariness. This article outlines the multidimensionality of voluntariness and identifies what could reduce voluntariness, especially in first-in-human clinical trials involving cell therapies. In such trials, truly voluntary consent is especially important because: such trials may involve risk of serious harm, while in case of some diseases, eligible patients often have potentially effective therapeutic alternatives; patients considering participation in high-risk first-in-human trials may feel more desperate and some may be dependent on their caregivers, including those in the family; implanted cells cannot be taken out of the patient's body if the patient wants to withdraw.

摘要

关于知情同意中自愿性内容的共识尚缺乏。需要核心标准来确保自愿同意。本文概述了自愿性的多维性,并确定了哪些因素可能会降低自愿性,特别是在涉及细胞治疗的首次人体临床试验中。在这些试验中,真正的自愿同意尤为重要,因为:这些试验可能涉及严重伤害的风险,而在某些疾病的情况下,合格的患者通常有潜在有效的治疗替代方案;考虑参与高风险首次人体试验的患者可能感到更加绝望,一些患者可能依赖于他们的照顾者,包括那些在家庭中的照顾者;如果患者想要退出,植入的细胞不能从患者体内取出。

相似文献

1
Understanding voluntariness of consent in first-in-human cell therapy trials.理解首例人体细胞治疗试验中同意的自愿性。
Regen Med. 2020 May;15(5):1647-1660. doi: 10.2217/rme-2019-0126. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
2
Voluntariness of consent to HIV clinical research: A conceptual and empirical pilot study.艾滋病临床研究同意的自愿性:一项概念性和实证性的试点研究。
J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(11):1387-1404. doi: 10.1177/1359105316628737. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
I don't like that, it's tricking people too much...: acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke.我不喜欢那样,它太会欺骗人了……:急性中风溶栓治疗试验的知情同意
J Med Ethics. 2008 Oct;34(10):751-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023168.
4
Patients' perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials.患者对神经肿瘤学临床试验知情同意过程的认知
Neuro Oncol. 2008 Jun;10(3):348-54. doi: 10.1215/15228517-2008-007. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
5
Supporting positive experiences and sustained participation in clinical trials: looking beyond information provision.支持积极的体验和持续参与临床试验:超越信息提供。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Dec;38(12):751-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100059. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
6
Voluntary consent: why a value-neutral concept won't work.自愿同意:为何价值中立的概念行不通。
J Med Philos. 2012 Jun;37(3):226-54. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs016. Epub 2012 May 2.
7
Translational research beyond approval: a two-stage ethics review.获批后的转化研究:两阶段伦理审查
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Aug;10(8):W1-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.500199.
8
Voluntariness of consent in paediatric HIV clinical trials: a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study of participants in the CHAPAS-4 and ODYSSEY trials in Uganda.儿科艾滋病毒临床试验中同意的自愿性:对乌干达CHAPAS - 4和奥德赛试验参与者的混合方法横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 1;14(3):e077546. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077546.
9
Patients' perceptions of informed consent in acute myocardial infarction research: a Danish study.急性心肌梗死研究中患者对知情同意的认知:一项丹麦研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2313-24. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.023.
10
Exponential growth in the number of clinical trials and research in general involving humans.总体而言,涉及人类的临床试验和研究数量呈指数级增长。
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2002 Fall;16(3):143-5. doi: 10.1891/rtnp.16.3.143.53009.

引用本文的文献

1
Who should be included in first-in-human trials? A systematic review of reasons.首次人体试验应纳入哪些人?原因的系统评价。
J Transl Med. 2025 Jun 11;23(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06550-y.
2
Broad consent in the emergency department: a cross sectional study.急诊科的广泛同意:一项横断面研究。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Feb 18;83(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01529-z.
3
Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Bio-Artificial Organ Technology: A Systematic Review of Ethical Issues.生物人工器官技术的早期临床研究:伦理问题的系统评价。
Transpl Int. 2022 Oct 31;35:10751. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10751. eCollection 2022.