自愿同意：为何价值中立的概念行不通。
Voluntary consent: why a value-neutral concept won't work.
作者信息
Wertheimer Alan
机构信息
Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
出版信息
J Med Philos. 2012 Jun;37(3):226-54. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs016. Epub 2012 May 2.
Abstract
Some maintain that voluntariness is a value-neutral concept. On that view, someone acts involuntarily if subject to a controlling influence or has no acceptable alternatives. I argue that a value-neutral conception of voluntariness cannot explain when and why consent is invalid and that we need a moralized account of voluntariness. On that view, most concerns about the voluntariness of consent to participate in research are not well founded.
摘要
一些人坚持认为自愿性是一个价值中立的概念。按照那种观点，如果受到控制性影响或没有可接受的选择，那么某人的行为就是非自愿的。我认为，自愿性的价值中立概念无法解释同意何时以及为何无效，我们需要一个关于自愿性的道德化解释。按照那种观点，大多数对参与研究的同意的自愿性的担忧是没有充分根据的。
相似文献
1
Voluntary consent: why a value-neutral concept won't work.自愿同意：为何价值中立的概念行不通。
J Med Philos. 2012 Jun;37(3):226-54. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhs016. Epub 2012 May 2.
2
The concept of voluntary consent.自愿同意的概念。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):6-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318.
3
Voluntariness of consent to HIV clinical research: A conceptual and empirical pilot study.艾滋病临床研究同意的自愿性：一项概念性和实证性的试点研究。
J Health Psychol. 2017 Sep;22(11):1387-1404. doi: 10.1177/1359105316628737. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
On the concept and measure of voluntariness: insights from behavioral economics and cognitive science.
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):25-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583321.
5
Can a theory of voluntariness be a priori and value-free?一种关于自愿性的理论能是先验的且无价值取向的吗？
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):17-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583325.
6
Autonomy and informed consent: a mistaken association?自主性与知情同意：一种错误的关联？
Med Health Care Philos. 2007 Sep;10(3):253-64. doi: 10.1007/s11019-007-9048-4. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
7
Manipulation in the enrollment of research participants.研究参与者的招募操纵。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Mar-Apr;43(2):38-47. doi: 10.1002/hast.144. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
8
What we learned about voluntariness and consent: incorporating "background situations" and understanding into analyses.我们对自愿性和同意的了解：将“背景情况”和理解纳入分析
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):31-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583328.
9
Risk-Taking: Individual and Family Interests.
J Med Philos. 2015 Aug;40(4):437-50. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv010. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
10
Social Autonomy and Family-Based Informed Consent.社会自主性与基于家庭的知情同意
J Med Philos. 2019 Sep 17;44(5):621-639. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhz020.
引用本文的文献
1
Deceiving Research Participants: Is It Inconsistent With Valid Consent?欺骗研究参与者：是否与有效同意不一致？
J Med Philos. 2022 Nov 5;47(4):558-571. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhac014.
2
Maternal perceptions of breastfeeding and infant nutrition among a select group of Maasai women.特定群体马赛妇女母乳喂养和婴儿营养的母亲认知。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jan 7;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2165-7.
3
Brainjacking in deep brain stimulation and autonomy.深度脑刺激与自主性中的脑劫持
Ethics Inf Technol. 2018;20(3):219-232. doi: 10.1007/s10676-018-9466-4. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
4
Informed consent in paediatric critical care research--a South African perspective.儿科重症监护研究中的知情同意——南非视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 9;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0052-6.
本文引用的文献
1
The concept of voluntary consent.自愿同意的概念。
Am J Bioeth. 2011 Aug;11(8):6-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583318.
2
More than the money: a review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations.不仅仅是为了钱：一项关于健康志愿者动机的文献综述。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):342-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.12.003. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
3
The obligation to participate in biomedical research.参与生物医学研究的义务。
JAMA. 2009 Jul 1;302(1):67-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.931.
4
Do incentives exert undue influence on survey participation? Experimental evidence.激励措施是否会对调查参与产生不当影响？实验证据。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Sep;3(3):49-56. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.3.49.
5
Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model.研究同意的自愿性：一个概念模型。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2009 Jan-Feb;39(1):30-9. doi: 10.1353/hcr.0.0103.
6
The live organ donor's consent: is it informed and voluntary?活体器官捐赠者的同意：是否是知情且自愿的？
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2008 Jul;22(3):196-9. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
7
Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?参与研究的报酬：一种强制性的提议？
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):389-92. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.021857.
8
Voluntariness of consent for research: an empirical and conceptual review.研究同意的自愿性：一项实证与概念性综述。
Med Care. 2002 Sep;40(9 Suppl):V69-80. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000023958.28108.9C.
9
The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.将支付作为对研究对象的益处这一矛盾案例。
IRB. 1989 Nov-Dec;11(6):1-3.
10
The biotech death of Jesse Gelsinger.
N Y Times Mag. 1999 Nov 28:136-140, 149-150.
Zotero 插件