1Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
2Nyírő Gyula National Institute of Psychiatry and Addictions, Budapest, Hungary.
J Behav Addict. 2020 May 26;9(2):225-246. doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00030. Print 2020 Jun.
Due to its important role in both healthy groups and those with physical, mental and behavioral disorders, impulsivity is a widely researched construct. Among various self-report questionnaires of impulsivity, the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale is arguably the most frequently used measure. Despite its international use, inconsistencies in the suggested factor structure of its latest version, the BIS-11, have been observed repeatedly in different samples. The goal of the present study was therefore to test the factor structure of the BIS-11 in several samples.
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on two representative samples of Hungarian adults (N = 2,457; N = 2,040) and a college sample (N = 765).
Analyses did not confirm the original model of the measure in any of the samples. Based on explorative factor analyses, an alternative three-factor model (cognitive impulsivity; behavioral impulsivity; and impatience/restlessness) of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale is suggested. The pattern of the associations between the three factors and aggression, exercise, smoking, alcohol use, and psychological distress supports the construct validity of this new model.
The new measurement model of impulsivity was confirmed in two independent samples. However, it requires further cross-cultural validation to clarify the content of self-reported impulsivity in both clinical and nonclinical samples.
由于冲动在身体健康人群和身心行为障碍人群中都起着重要作用,因此它是一个被广泛研究的概念。在各种冲动的自我报告问卷中,巴瑞特冲动量表(Barratt Impulsiveness Scale)可以说是使用最频繁的测量工具。尽管它在国际上得到广泛应用,但在不同样本中,其最新版本(BIS-11)的建议因子结构一直存在不一致性。因此,本研究的目的是在多个样本中检验 BIS-11 的因子结构。
对两个具有代表性的匈牙利成年人样本(N=2457;N=2040)和一个大学生样本(N=765)进行了探索性和验证性因子分析。
在任何样本中,分析都没有证实该测量工具的原始模型。基于探索性因子分析,建议采用替代的三因素模型(认知冲动、行为冲动和急躁/不安)来对巴瑞特冲动量表进行评估。这三个因素与攻击性、运动、吸烟、饮酒和心理困扰之间的关联模式支持了这个新模型的结构有效性。
新的冲动测量模型在两个独立的样本中得到了验证。然而,为了明确在临床和非临床样本中自我报告的冲动的内容,还需要进一步进行跨文化验证。