Department of Chemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Anal Chem. 2020 Aug 4;92(15):10807-10814. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c02290. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
The mechanisms whereby protein ions are released into the gas phase from charged droplets during electrospray ionization (ESI) continue to be controversial. Several pathways have been proposed. For native ESI the charged residue model (CRM) is favored; it entails the liberation of proteins via solvent evaporation to dryness. Unfolded proteins likely follow the chain ejection model (CEM), which involves the gradual expulsion of stretched-out chains from the droplet. According to the ion evaporation model (IEM) ions undergo electrostatically driven desorption from the droplet surface. The IEM is well supported for small precharged species such as Na. However, it is unclear whether proteins can show IEM behavior as well. We examined this question using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, mass spectrometry (MS), and ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in positive ion mode. Ubiquitin was chosen as the model protein because of its structural stability which allows the protein charge in solution to be controlled via pH adjustment without changing the protein conformation. MD simulations on small ESI droplets (3 nm radius) showed CRM behavior regardless of the protein charge in solution. Surprisingly, many MD runs on larger droplets (5.5 nm radius) culminated in IEM ejection of ubiquitin, as long as the protein carried a sufficiently large positive solution charge. MD simulations predicted that nonspecific salt adducts are less prevalent for IEM-generated protein ions than for CRM products. This prediction was confirmed experimentally. Also, collision cross sections of MD structures were in good agreement with IMS data. Overall, this work reveals that the CRM, CEM, and IEM all represent viable pathways for generating gaseous protein ions during ESI. The IEM is favored for proteins that are tightly folded and highly charged in solution and for droplets in a suitable size regime.
在电喷雾电离(ESI)过程中,带电荷的液滴将蛋白质离子释放到气相中的机制仍存在争议。已经提出了几种途径。对于天然 ESI,带电残基模型(CRM)占优势;它通过溶剂蒸发将蛋白质干燥以释放出来。展开的蛋白质可能遵循链逐出模型(CEM),其涉及从液滴中逐渐逐出拉伸的链。根据离子蒸发模型(IEM),离子通过从液滴表面的静电驱动解吸。IEM 得到了很好的支持,适用于小的预荷电物质,如 Na。然而,尚不清楚蛋白质是否也可以表现出 IEM 行为。我们使用分子动力学(MD)模拟、质谱(MS)和正离子模式下的离子迁移谱(IMS)来研究这个问题。选择泛素作为模型蛋白,因为其结构稳定性允许通过 pH 值调节来控制溶液中的蛋白电荷,而不改变蛋白构象。对小 ESI 液滴(3nm 半径)的 MD 模拟显示 CRM 行为,无论溶液中的蛋白电荷如何。令人惊讶的是,只要蛋白带有足够大的正溶液电荷,许多对较大液滴(5.5nm 半径)的 MD 运行最终导致 IEM 逐出泛素。MD 模拟预测,与 CRM 产物相比,IEM 产生的蛋白离子中出现非特异性盐加合物的情况较少。这一预测得到了实验的证实。此外,MD 结构的碰撞截面与 IMS 数据吻合良好。总的来说,这项工作揭示了 CRM、CEM 和 IEM 都代表了 ESI 过程中产生气态蛋白离子的可行途径。IEM 更适合于在溶液中紧密折叠和高度荷电的蛋白质以及在适当尺寸范围内的液滴。