Singh Awadhesh Kumar, Majumdar Sujoy, Singh Ritu, Misra Anoop
G. D Hospital & Diabetes Institute, Kolkata, India.
G. D Hospital & Diabetes Institute, Kolkata, India; Peerless Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):971-978. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.054. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
Interest in corticosteroid therapy in COVID-19 has been rekindled after the results from Randomized Evaluation of COVid-19 thERapY (RECOVERY) Trial. However, the World health Organization has not recommended corticosteroid in the treatment of COVID-19. We sought to conduct a systematic review on the role of corticosteroid in the management of patients of COVID-19.
A systematic electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane and MedRxiv database using specific keywords was made up till June 17, 2020. Full text of all the original articles with supplementary appendix that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were retrieved and a detailed analysis of results were represented.
Of the 5 studies (4 retrospective studies and 1 quasi-prospective study) conducted for evaluating the role of corticosteroids, 3 studies have shown benefit, while 2 studies shown no benefit and there was a suggestion of significant harm in critical cases in one sub-study. RECOVERY trial is the only randomized controlled trial that has shown a significant reduction of death by 35% in ventilated patients and by 20% amongst patients on supplemental oxygen therapy with the dexamethasone, although no benefit was observed in mild cases.
While the results from retrospective studies are heterogenous and difficult to infer of a definitive protective benefit with corticosteroids, RECOVERY trial found a significantly better outcome with dexamethasone, mostly in severe cases. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to replicate the outcome shown in RECOVERY trial for a substantial conclusion.
在新冠病毒病治疗随机评估(RECOVERY)试验结果公布后,人们对新冠病毒病的皮质类固醇疗法重新燃起了兴趣。然而,世界卫生组织并未推荐将皮质类固醇用于新冠病毒病的治疗。我们试图对皮质类固醇在新冠病毒病患者管理中的作用进行系统评价。
截至2020年6月17日,使用特定关键词对PubMed、Cochrane和MedRxiv数据库进行了系统的电子检索。检索了所有符合纳入标准的带有补充附录的原始文章全文,并对结果进行了详细分析。
在为评估皮质类固醇作用而开展的5项研究(4项回顾性研究和1项半前瞻性研究)中,3项研究显示有益,2项研究显示无益,且在一项子研究中提示在重症病例中有显著危害。RECOVERY试验是唯一一项随机对照试验,该试验显示,使用地塞米松可使接受机械通气的患者死亡风险显著降低35%,使接受补充氧气治疗的患者死亡风险显著降低20%,不过在轻症病例中未观察到益处。
虽然回顾性研究的结果存在异质性,难以推断皮质类固醇具有明确的保护作用,但RECOVERY试验发现地塞米松能带来显著更好的结果,主要体现在重症病例中。尽管如此,仍需要更多研究来重复RECOVERY试验所示的结果,以便得出实质性结论。