• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Caesarean Section on Maternal Request: An Italian Comparative Study on Patients' Characteristics, Pregnancy Outcomes and Guidelines Overview.剖宫产术的产妇要求:意大利的一项比较研究,比较患者特征、妊娠结局和指南概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4665. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134665.
2
Turkish obstetricians' self-birth preferences, attitudes and practices towards caesarean section on maternal request and vaginal birth after caesarean section: a national online survey.土耳其产科医生对产妇要求剖宫产和剖宫产术后阴道分娩的自我分娩偏好、态度和实践:一项全国性在线调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Aug;42(6):2033-2038. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2080531. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
Epidemiology of Caesarean section on maternal request in Australia: A population-based study.澳大利亚因产妇要求进行剖宫产的流行病学:一项基于人群的研究。
Midwifery. 2023 Feb;117:103578. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103578. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
4
Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.产妇要求剖宫产:瑞典一项与共享决策和以患者为中心的护理相关的冲突定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.
5
Guideline documents on caesarean section on maternal request in Sweden: varying usability with a restrictive approach.瑞典关于产妇要求剖宫产的指南文件:限制方法导致可用性差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):1117. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10077-7.
6
Elective Caesarean section on maternal request in Germany: factors affecting decision making concerning mode of delivery.德国因产妇要求而行的选择性剖宫产:影响分娩方式决策的因素
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1151-1156. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4349-1. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
Evaluation of psychosocial and biological parameters in women seeking for a caesarean section and women who are aiming for vaginal delivery: a cross-sectional study.寻求剖宫产的女性与旨在顺产的女性的心理社会和生物学参数评估:一项横断面研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Apr;297(4):897-905. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4654-3. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
8
Mental health after first childbirth in women requesting a caesarean section; a retrospective register-based study.初产妇要求剖宫产术后的心理健康:一项回顾性基于登记的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1514-2.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes in the following delivery after previous preterm caesarean breech birth: a national cohort study.既往剖宫产臀位分娩后再次分娩的母婴结局:一项全国性队列研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):49-54. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1871888. Epub 2021 May 2.
10
Chinese obstetricians' attitudes, beliefs, and clinical practices related to cesarean delivery on maternal request.中国产科医生在产妇要求剖宫产方面的态度、信念和临床实践。
Women Birth. 2020 Feb;33(1):e67-e71. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

引用本文的文献

1
From one birth to the next: how cesarean section affects maternal physical activity and health in later pregnancy-A prospective cohort study.从一次分娩到下一次分娩:剖宫产如何影响产妇在后续孕期的身体活动及健康——一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 13;13:1657089. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1657089. eCollection 2025.
2
The significance of different intervertebral spaces in combined spinal epidural anesthesia in cesarean section.不同节段蛛网膜下隙-硬膜外腔联合阻滞在剖宫产术中的意义。
Technol Health Care. 2024;32(6):4445-4452. doi: 10.3233/THC-240599.
3
Cesarean section rates in Turkey 2018-2023: Overview of national data by using Robson ten group classification system.2018 - 2023年土耳其剖宫产率:运用罗布森十组分类系统对全国数据的概述
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep 4;20(3):191-198. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.68235.
4
Caesarean Section on Maternal Request-Ethical and Juridic Issues: A Narrative Review.产妇要求剖宫产术的伦理和法律问题:叙事性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 10;58(9):1255. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091255.
5
Immigration and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in an Italian Free Care Hospital.意大利一家免费医疗医院中的移民与不良妊娠结局
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Oct 7;13:911-917. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S322828. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison of Labor and Delivery Complications and Delivery Methods Between Physicians and White-Collar Workers.比较医生和白领劳动和分娩并发症与分娩方式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 19;17(14):5212. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145212.

本文引用的文献

1
Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.女性选择剖宫产作为分娩方式是她们的决定吗?利益相关者观点的文献综述。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2440-2.
2
Length of stay following cesarean sections: A population based study in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.剖宫产术后住院时间:2005-2015 年意大利东北部弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区的一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0210753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210753. eCollection 2019.
3
Maternal short-term complications after planned cesarean delivery without medical indication: A registry-based study.计划性剖宫产无医学指征的产妇近期并发症:基于登记的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jul;98(7):905-912. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13549. Epub 2019 Feb 24.
4
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 761: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.761:产妇要求剖宫产。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;133(1):e73-e77. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003006.
5
Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.全球剖宫产使用情况及差异的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1341-1348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7.
6
A cost-comparison of midwife-led compared with consultant-led maternity care in Ireland (the MidU study).爱尔兰助产士主导与顾问主导的产妇护理成本比较(MidU研究)。
Midwifery. 2015 Nov;31(11):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it.剖宫产术后粘连预防:证据及缺乏证据
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.027. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Placenta accreta, increta, and percreta.胎盘植入、穿透性胎盘植入和胎盘粘连。
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013 Mar;40(1):137-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.12.002.
9
Caesarean section on maternal request for non-medical reasons: putting the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence guidelines in perspective.产妇非医疗原因剖宫产:从英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南看问题。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;27(2):165-77. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.006. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
10
Uterine rupture associated with VBAC.与剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)相关的子宫破裂
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Dec;55(4):978-87. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31826fd9b0.

剖宫产术的产妇要求:意大利的一项比较研究,比较患者特征、妊娠结局和指南概述。

Caesarean Section on Maternal Request: An Italian Comparative Study on Patients' Characteristics, Pregnancy Outcomes and Guidelines Overview.

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;17(13):4665. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134665.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17134665
PMID:32610490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7369872/
Abstract

In recent years, the rate of caesarean sections has risen all over the world. Accordingly, efforts are being made worldwide to understand this trend and to counteract it effectively. Several factors have been identified as contributing to the selection of caesarean section (CS), especially an obstetricians' beliefs, attitudes and clinical practices. However, relatively few studies have been conducted to understand the mechanisms involved, to explore influencing factors and to clearly define the risks associated with the caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR). This comparative study was conducted to elucidate the factors influencing the choice of CSMR, as well as to compare the associated risks of CSMR to CS for breech presentation among Italian women. From 2015 to 2018, a total of 2348 women gave birth by caesarean section, of which 8.60% (202 women) chose a CSMR. We found that high educational attainment, use of assisted reproductive technology, previous operative deliveries and miscarriages within the obstetric history could be positively correlated with the choice of CSMR in a statistically significant way. This trend was not confirmed when the population was stratified based on patients' characteristics, obstetric complications and gestational age. Finally, no major complications were found in patients that underwent CSMR. We believe that it is essential to evaluate patients on a case-by-case basis. It is essential to understand the personal experience, to explain the knowledge available on the subject and to ensure a full understanding of the risks and benefits of the medical practice to guarantee the patients not only their best scientific preparation but also human understanding.

摘要

近年来,全世界剖宫产率都有所上升。因此,全世界都在努力了解这一趋势,并有效地加以遏制。已经确定了一些因素会导致剖宫产的选择(CS),特别是产科医生的信念、态度和临床实践。然而,相对较少的研究旨在了解其中的机制,探索影响因素,并明确界定因产妇要求而进行剖宫产(CSMR)的相关风险。本项比较研究旨在阐明影响 CSMR 选择的因素,并比较意大利妇女臀位剖宫产时 CSMR 与 CS 的相关风险。2015 年至 2018 年,共有 2348 名妇女通过剖宫产分娩,其中 8.60%(202 名)选择了 CSMR。我们发现,高学历、使用辅助生殖技术、以前的剖宫产分娩和产科病史中的流产可以与 CSMR 的选择呈正相关,这在统计学上是显著的。当根据患者特征、产科并发症和胎龄对人群进行分层时,这一趋势并未得到证实。最后,在接受 CSMR 的患者中未发现重大并发症。我们认为,有必要对每位患者进行评估。了解个人经历、解释有关该主题的知识,并确保充分了解医疗实践的风险和益处,这一点至关重要,以保证患者不仅得到最好的科学准备,还能得到人性化的理解。