School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for Health, Waitsfield, VT, USA.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 15;10(5):277-280. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.45.
The bureaucracy's goal is to maintain uniformity and control within discrete areas of activity and relies on hierarchical processes and procedural correctness as means to suppress autonomous decision making. That worldview, however, is unsuited for problem solving of real world VUCA (Volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity) problems. Solving problems in the VUCA world requires curiosity, creativity and collaboration, and a willingness to deeply engage and an ability to painstakingly work through their seemingly contradictory and chaotic pathways. In addition, it necessitates leadership. Leaders require a deep - indeed academic - understanding of the nature of the problems and the veracity of various problem-solving approaches. Leadership after all means "[facilitating] That are the people at the coalface who understand and have to manage the complexities relating to problems unique to their local environment for which never work. is more than a tool, it is - in a sense - a way of being, namely deeply interested in understanding the highly interconnected and interdependent nature of the issues affecting our life and work. Hence, is, contrary to what Haynes and colleagues state in their "summation for the public reader," neither [nor difficult] ." Such a view is as much misleading as self-defeating.
官僚机构的目标是在离散的活动领域内保持统一性和控制力,并依赖于等级流程和程序正确性来抑制自主决策。然而,这种世界观不适合解决现实世界中的 VUCA(易变、不确定、复杂和模糊)问题。在 VUCA 世界中解决问题需要好奇心、创造力和协作精神,以及深入参与和耐心解决看似矛盾和混乱的路径的意愿。此外,它还需要领导力。领导者需要深刻的——实际上是学术的——理解问题的本质和各种解决问题方法的真实性。毕竟,领导力意味着“促进”人们处于第一线,他们理解并必须管理与他们当地环境特有的问题相关的复杂性,而 永远无法解决这些问题。它不仅仅是一种工具,在某种意义上,它是一种存在方式,即对理解影响我们生活和工作的问题的高度互联和相互依存的本质有着浓厚的兴趣。因此,与海恩斯和同事们在他们为公众读者的“总结”中所陈述的相反,它既不是 [也不难] 。”这种观点既具有误导性,又具有自我挫败性。