Marshall Deborah A, Burgos-Liz Lina, IJzerman Maarten J, Osgood Nathaniel D, Padula William V, Higashi Mitchell K, Wong Peter K, Pasupathy Kalyan S, Crown William
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and the McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; Alberta Bone & Joint Health Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):5-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.001.
Health care delivery systems are inherently complex, consisting of multiple tiers of interdependent subsystems and processes that are adaptive to changes in the environment and behave in a nonlinear fashion. Traditional health technology assessment and modeling methods often neglect the wider health system impacts that can be critical for achieving desired health system goals and are often of limited usefulness when applied to complex health systems. Researchers and health care decision makers can either underestimate or fail to consider the interactions among the people, processes, technology, and facility designs. Health care delivery system interventions need to incorporate the dynamics and complexities of the health care system context in which the intervention is delivered. This report provides an overview of common dynamic simulation modeling methods and examples of health care system interventions in which such methods could be useful. Three dynamic simulation modeling methods are presented to evaluate system interventions for health care delivery: system dynamics, discrete event simulation, and agent-based modeling. In contrast to conventional evaluations, a dynamic systems approach incorporates the complexity of the system and anticipates the upstream and downstream consequences of changes in complex health care delivery systems. This report assists researchers and decision makers in deciding whether these simulation methods are appropriate to address specific health system problems through an eight-point checklist referred to as the SIMULATE (System, Interactions, Multilevel, Understanding, Loops, Agents, Time, Emergence) tool. It is a primer for researchers and decision makers working in health care delivery and implementation sciences who face complex challenges in delivering effective and efficient care that can be addressed with system interventions. On reviewing this report, the readers should be able to identify whether these simulation modeling methods are appropriate to answer the problem they are addressing and to recognize the differences of these methods from other modeling approaches used typically in health technology assessment applications.
医疗保健提供系统本质上是复杂的,由多层相互依存的子系统和流程组成,这些子系统和流程能够适应环境变化并以非线性方式运行。传统的卫生技术评估和建模方法往往忽视了对实现预期卫生系统目标至关重要的更广泛的卫生系统影响,并且在应用于复杂的卫生系统时通常用处有限。研究人员和医疗保健决策者要么低估,要么未能考虑人员、流程、技术和设施设计之间的相互作用。医疗保健提供系统干预措施需要纳入干预措施实施所处的医疗保健系统背景的动态性和复杂性。本报告概述了常见的动态模拟建模方法以及此类方法可能有用的医疗保健系统干预措施示例。介绍了三种动态模拟建模方法来评估医疗保健提供的系统干预措施:系统动力学、离散事件模拟和基于主体的建模。与传统评估不同,动态系统方法纳入了系统的复杂性,并预测了复杂医疗保健提供系统变化的上游和下游后果。本报告通过一个名为SIMULATE(系统、相互作用、多层次、理解、循环、主体、时间、涌现)工具的八点清单,协助研究人员和决策者决定这些模拟方法是否适合解决特定的卫生系统问题。它是为在医疗保健提供和实施科学领域工作的研究人员和决策者编写的入门指南,他们在提供有效和高效的护理方面面临复杂挑战,而这些挑战可以通过系统干预措施来解决。在阅读本报告后,读者应该能够确定这些模拟建模方法是否适合回答他们正在解决的问题,并认识到这些方法与通常用于卫生技术评估应用的其他建模方法的差异。