• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Patient and public involvement in covid-19 policy making.

作者信息

Richards Tessa, Scowcroft Henry

机构信息

The BMJ, London, UK

The BMJ, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2575.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.m2575
PMID:32611571
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Patient and public involvement in covid-19 policy making.患者及公众参与新冠疫情政策制定。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 1;370:m2575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2575.
2
COVID-19 and Uncertainty: Lessons from the Frontline for Promoting Shared Decision Making.新冠疫情与不确定性：前线经验对促进共同决策的启示
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020 Aug 28;115(2):149-151. doi: 10.36660/abc.20200582.
3
Covid-19's known unknowns: population shared decision making.新冠疫情的已知未知因素：群体共同决策
BMJ. 2020 Nov 23;371:m4514. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4514.
4
Upholding Rights Under COVID-19: The Respectful Maternity Care Charter.维护新冠疫情下的权利：《尊重产妇护理宪章》
Health Hum Rights. 2020 Jun;22(1):391-394.
5
Cognitive Bias and Public Health Policy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的认知偏差与公共卫生政策
JAMA. 2020 Jul 28;324(4):337-338. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11623.
6
[COVID-19: what does epidemiology tell to decisionmakers?].[新型冠状病毒肺炎：流行病学能给决策者提供什么信息？]
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Jan-Feb;44(1):8. doi: 10.19191/EP20.1.P008.026.
7
Analyzing the Cost Effectiveness of Policy Responses for COVID-19: The Importance of Capturing Social Consequences.分析应对新冠疫情政策措施的成本效益：考量社会影响的重要性。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):251-253. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20922987.
8
Science, policy, people, and public health: What Is COVID-19 teaching us?科学、政策、民众与公共卫生：新冠疫情给了我们哪些启示？
Indian J Public Health. 2020 Jun;64(Supplement):S87-S89. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_540_20.
9
Controlling COVID-19.控制新冠疫情。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):450. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0883-0.
10
What's next for COVID-19 apps? Governance and oversight.新冠病毒应用程序的下一步是什么？治理与监督。
Science. 2020 Nov 13;370(6518):760-762. doi: 10.1126/science.abd9006.

引用本文的文献

1
How patients and informal caregivers can be trained to effectively contribute to improved quality of healthcare services: action research on the development of the Dutch Patient As a Person Academy.如何培训患者及非正式照护者以有效促进医疗服务质量提升：关于荷兰“患者即个体学院”发展的行动研究
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e079712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079712.
2
Patients' perspectives on ethical principles to fairly allocate scarce surgical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a Q-methodology study.荷兰 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配稀缺外科资源的伦理原则：一项 Q 方法学研究 。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e086681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086681.
3
Wonderings to research questions: Engaging patients in long COVID research prioritization within a learning health system.
对研究问题的思考：在学习型健康系统中让患者参与长新冠研究的优先级确定
Learn Health Syst. 2024 Feb 28;8(Suppl 1):e10410. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10410. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
The public's considerations about implementing non-pharmaceutical interventions to manage a novel COVID-19 epidemic.公众对于实施非药物干预措施来应对新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情的考量。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 26;10(9):e30390. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30390. eCollection 2024 May 15.
5
Patient Engagement in Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Critical Reflection on an Epistemic Challenge.COVID-19大流行期间患者参与医学教育：对认知挑战的批判性反思
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Sep 30;10:103. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000103.2. eCollection 2021.
6
Co-producing an online patient public community research hub: a qualitative study exploring the perspectives of national institute for health research (NIHR) research champions in England.共同创建一个在线患者公共社区研究中心：一项探索英国国家卫生研究院（NIHR）研究倡导者观点的定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 16;10(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00556-4.
7
Challenges of using body bags for COVID-19 deaths from the healthcare provider perspective - a qualitative study.从医护人员角度看使用尸袋处理新冠死亡病例面临的挑战——一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 30;13(1):e002548. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002548.
8
"I thought I was going to die": Experiences of COVID-19 patients managed at home in Uganda.“我以为我会死”: 乌干达在家中接受 COVID-19 治疗的患者的经历。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 12;18(12):e0295113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295113. eCollection 2023.
9
Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study.公众对荷兰四项 COVID-19 非药物干预措施决策的参与偏好：一项调查研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 5;18(10):e0292119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292119. eCollection 2023.
10
Digital undergraduate medical education and patient and carer involvement: a rapid systematic review of current practice.数字式本科医学教育和患者及照护者参与：当前实践的快速系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 16;23(1):335. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04218-z.